Jump to content
CCC

PGA Tour Players Not Marking Balls when In Position to Assist Another Player, #Backstopping

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, JxQx said:

It would not have a big impact on pace of play at the pro level right now as they do not walk ahead a bit towards their ball like amateurs, but If i have to wait for a player to walk 40 yards or so to mark their ball while I'm waiting in a bunker that's added time for something that does not happen a whole lot.

And yet… if they say "Hold up, I'm gonna mark that" you've gotta wait.

Sometimes enforcement of the rules takes ten seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

20 minutes ago, iacas said:

And yet… if they say "Hold up, I'm gonna mark that" you've gotta wait.

Sometimes enforcement of the rules takes ten seconds.

I agree and that's fine. It just seems from this discussion that it shouldn't be an "if they ask/say", it should be required. I could just be misinterpreting that though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, JxQx said:

I agree and that's fine. It just seems from this discussion that it shouldn't be an "if they ask/say", it should be required. I could just be misinterpreting that though.

Kokrak should have asked. It was his responsibility to protect the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's not a "Witch Hunt"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/21/2017 at 8:27 PM, CCC said:

It's not a "Witch Hunt"

Sure takes on the appearance of one at times.  It's one reason why I've never hooked up on Twitter (and Facebook is no better).  Too many negative attacks on a wide variety of topics, most often by those who have the least knowledge of the subject.  Engaging in the same sort of verbal assaults on this forum would get the user banned.

Calling this a conspiracy with no actual evidence of one is, by definition, a "Witch Hunt". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

26 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

Calling this a conspiracy with no actual evidence of one is, by definition, a "Witch Hunt". 

Rick, there's plenty of evidence.

Players have stood by greenside for a few years now while their fellow competitors play shots to the hole and they have plenty of time to go mark. In fact, since a fellow competitor has to wait, you don't even have to be right there - you just have to reasonably believe there is a chance the ball could assist the play of a fellow competitor.

The evidence is not non-existent, and it is growing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, iacas said:

Rick, there's plenty of evidence.

Players have stood by greenside for a few years now while their fellow competitors play shots to the hole and they have plenty of time to go mark. In fact, since a fellow competitor has to wait, you don't even have to be right there - you just have to reasonably believe there is a chance the ball could assist the play of a fellow competitor.

The evidence is not non-existent, and it is growing.

That is not evidence of a conspiracy.  You can suspect collusion if you want, but there is absolutely no proof that anyone conspired to anything.  What little evidence that suspicion provides is completely circumstantial, and you can't provide a motive for such a conspiracy.  

You may be right that there is a tacit conspiracy, but that would be very hard to prove to the point of meting out any punishment.  Suspicion and supposition certainly wouldn't convict anyone in a court of law, and I feel that you have to hold it to at least that high a standard. 

Edited by Fourputt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/22/2017 at 6:00 AM, Golfingdad said:

Correct.  It’s a problem on the PGA tour, not the LPGA tour, so it’s not a witch hunt, but rather a wizard hunt. :)

I believe that the word witch is gender neutral.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/24/2017 at 3:24 AM, Fourputt said:

That is not evidence of a conspiracy.

Yes, it is. Something happening once or twice, you can toss aside. Something happening multiple times, and/or with increasing frequency, it's evidence that something is up.

I've attended, as you know, PGA Tour events. There's a lot more of this happening now than 10 years ago, and very few of it is seen on TV.

On 10/24/2017 at 3:24 AM, Fourputt said:

You can suspect collusion if you want, but there is absolutely no proof that anyone conspired to anything.

You seem to be confusing evidence with proof. At least the definitions I'm using.

You can present evidence, the weight of which leads a jury to convict. If you have PROOF that someone killed someone else, however, it's pretty much an open-and-shut case.

On 10/24/2017 at 3:24 AM, Fourputt said:

What little evidence that suspicion provides is completely circumstantial, and you can't provide a motive for such a conspiracy.

Huh?

My suspicions aren't the evidence I'm talking about. The "evidence" in this case are the number of times I've seen players knowingly, willingly, with plenty of time to mark… leave a ball in a position to assist another player in his play.

That's the "evidence." Not my suspicions. The evidence leads to my suspicions.

On 10/24/2017 at 3:24 AM, Fourputt said:

You may be right that there is a tacit conspiracy, but that would be very hard to prove to the point of meting out any punishment.

I agree.

But the PGA Tour should do the right thing here, send a memo to all PGA Tour players informing them of the rule as written, and tell them that the referees have been told to enforce the rule, and that players found more than twice in a season not protecting the field will face a possible supplemental fine or something.

The PGA Tour brand is a clean cut one, and this threatens to undermine it (not a ton, but still), as Geoff Shackelford and others have written.

I say nip it in the bud. It's seemingly growing and increasing in frequency, and when you have the Player of the Year saying the stuff he's said… it could potentially get ugly (tempest in a teapot ugly, since it's just GOLF, but still…).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

More of this today in the final round of the WGC-HSBC in Shanghai.  On the 15th hole hole, Stenson had pitched from greenside to within a couple feet of the pin.  Koepka and DJ both had shots from greenside bunkers to make, and Stenson didn't mark his ball.  Announcers even commented on it. 

Neither of them hit Stenson's ball, but it could have affected the outcome, particularly since these guys (and Justin Rose) were all at the top of the leaderboard.

Similar situation at the 17th hole.  Stenson pitched onto the green to within a few feet, doesn't mark his ball, and then DJ with a shot from a greenside bunker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

More of this today in the final round of the WGC-HSBC in Shanghai.  On the 15th hole hole, Stenson had pitched from greenside to within a couple feet of the pin.  Koepka and DJ both had shots from greenside bunkers to make, and Stenson didn't mark his ball.  Announcers even commented on it.

Do you have video of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

37 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

On my TiVo 

Post it! Include the commentary.

If you're able to record a .mov file and can't find a place to host it or don't want to upload it to YouTube yourself, let's find a way to get it to me, and I'll upload it.

Include all the examples if you can, including how long it was between shots, etc. if possible.

Thanks.

I'd record the final round (GC usually re-airs them), but they're only re-airing the third round for some reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote

Thought: there is a better than decent chance Johnson and Koepka could play Stenson and eventual HSBC Champions winner Justin Rose in next year's Ryder Cup. I wonder if Stenson would leave his ball down as a backstop then? If so, then the game really has changed!

Ho hum. Plenty of time to say "hey wait up, I'm gonna mark that one." To protect himself, too, and the rest of the field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, iacas said:

Post it! Include the commentary.

If you're able to record a .mov file and can't find a place to host it or don't want to upload it to YouTube yourself, let's find a way to get it to me, and I'll upload it.

Include all the examples if you can, including how long it was between shots, etc. if possible.

Thanks.

I'd record the final round (GC usually re-airs them), but they're only re-airing the third round for some reason.

Give me a few days. I can do it, but it means moving and converting the whole 5-hour recording.  (I haven't figured out how to transfer and convert only a part of a TiVo recoding.) Then just editing to the appropriate few minutes I know how to do.

Something to do while the goblins and ghosts are out trying to get some candy from us. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

Give me a few days. I can do it, but it means moving and converting the whole 5-hour recording.  (I haven't figured out how to transfer and convert only a part of a TiVo recoding.) Then just editing to the appropriate few minutes I know how to do.

Something to do while the goblins and ghosts are out trying to get some candy from us. 

Or… just record it on your phone from your TV screen. I mean, the stuff you said is great if you want super high fidelity, but a phone even hand-held (resting on a makeshift stand is better) will be more than sufficient.

And, it helps to avoid YouTube's auto-copyright detection crap, which even though this is used properly and not in violation of copyright laws, is still better to avoid than to get a strike even temporarily on a YouTube account.

Of course, if you want to do all the work (sometimes I do way more than I should because I enjoy it), don't let me stop you. Just know it's not really necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • That's dumb. If you are "developing your swing" it's made better by the right amount of feedback. And > 1/2 of the time, the "feedback" doesn't even really include what the ball does. The ball flight takes care of itself. It is. Significantly so. From 140 yards, the gap in fairway vs. rough is a fifth of a shot. From 160, a quarter of a shot. There you go again putting words in my mouth, or (willfully?) mis-remembering stuff. I've pointed out the opposite many times: that the advances in equipment have narrowed the gap between players like Tiger and his peers. You couldn't mis-hit a muscleback 2-iron. You can mis-hit a 3-hybrid a little and still do okay. The gap in skill has been artificially reduced. Jack says it. Tiger says it. I've said it. Of course the modern ball is the "best" BALL "ever." But I've never said it's the best thing for the game, or makes the game most interesting, or whatever you're actually trying to say. 0 for 2 there @Jack Watson. Sorry. Yet… you were wrong. They didn't. They hit down. They launched the ball too low, and with too much spin.
    • The bottom line is very simple.  If you are developing your swing or a students is it made better by more or less feedback?  I recommend anyone developing to use the highest spin balls they can find because it gives more feedback. Higher spinning ball is more feedback.  Tour players today would hit straighter with a ball just like a Pinnacle.  Rocks were available back in the day.  No spin isn't what pros want in a ball.  They don't choose no spin because of many reasons. Often players now aim at rough because it's often not what anyone would call rough.  I think it's obvious that I was not making a statistical argument there just pointing out a tendency in the modern game that shows how course setup is weak/favors bomb and gouge brainless golf.  Rough is supposed to be harder to hit from than fairway.  That's also lost on modern gamers for the most part. Joro will agree,  he was there.  A higher spin ball helps separate wheat from chaff.  So many pros agree on these points...You seem to be somewhat alone in your contention that modern golf is the best thing ever... Anyways I have to go so no more time now for this...  I used caps because it's insulting to people to tell them they didn't know what they were doing. Again Best wishes to all for a safe holiday!
    • You can't go back to that, because pros could simply play a 1997 Pinnacle and hit it long and straight. The only thing about the new ball is that they made the 1997 Pinnacle spin more with shorter clubs. So wrap a 1997 Pinnacle in some softer outer layers, and bam, you've accomplished nothing. Balls are better now. So are clubs. So is the understanding that pros have to how important power is in the game. No, it's correct. When players first got launch monitors, the vast majority were hitting down too much, generating too much spin, and effectively hitting ballooning, rising shots. The Frank Nobilo piece, for example, says: So no, it's not arrogant or incorrect. It's perfectly valid. Nobody said anything about gear effect. Yell about it then. Sorry, no. You're simply and provably wrong here. Where do you come up with this bullshit? The rest I've left alone as it's your opinion and that's fine, but don't just spout out shit like it's fact when it's not, please.
    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.  That's what golfers used to aspire to the low launch and correct shape.  They might not hit as far as pros but the shaping that's what's been totally lost today. I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
    • One thing I like about our semi-private course is that everyone is very friendly and welcoming. Our seniors group is fun to play with, although they sometimes forget that I'm one of the unretired! and have to go to work most days. The course is a Nicklaus design with lots of challenging holes. The drawback is that the developer envisioned Winged Foot Way Out West, sporting a private-equity membership with everyone living in $400,000 homes. Thus, he contracted for an extremely difficult course with lots of bunkers. Legend has it that Nicklaus cautioned the developer against going overboard on the difficulty of holes, and the complexity of the bunkering (as in high maintenance costs). Well, much less $$ showed up than was forecast, and the developer was forced to sell. Fast forward, the greens crew has had a rough job in recent years trying to keep the bunkers in repair. A few pits have been removed as they settled out oddly, or ended up permanently flooded.  But, those remaining really keep the greens crew busy. We just don't have a Winged Foot maintenance budget. One other drawback: the driving range is at the top of a sloping hill, so it's a bit had to determine your true club carries because you're hitting down hill. Overall, I really like the course, the crew and the members.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.