Jump to content
IGNORED

The Electoral College


iacas
Note: This thread is 2685 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Before we begin, a warning.

Warning: Though we disallowed political threads a few weeks ago, and while this thread is about politics, it's not really super-"political" in the partisan sense. It should not cause conflict. The topic will either be closed and/or people will be given warnings if they make political posts.


The electoral college has never made sense to me. Democrats almost always win California, and get 55-0 votes, despite getting only about 60% of the popular vote (and who knows whether that gap would have been narrower had Republicans had a reason to turn out and vote).

It blows my mind that we can have a system that's so lopsided in this sense. Now, I think some states don't cast all of their votes for one person, but most do (I think), and it creates situations where you can win the popular vote but lose the electoral vote, sometimes by big margins.

What are the downsides to Instant Runoff voting? I'm not into politics at all, but in the little I've ever looked into it, it seems like a legitimate way to elect a candidate.

What are your thoughts on how we elect presidents in the United States? How do other countries do it, and what can we learn from them?

Remember the warning, please. This is not about the current race or really even any particular race.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is a very interesting topic. If you don't live in the "battleground" states, your vote is probably meaningless.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know why we need the electoral college in the modern era. We could easily go with the popular vote. I'm thinking the electoral college was needed back before we had communication systems, so electors were elected to go to D.C. and cast a ballot on behalf of their state. It could also be set up by congressional district instead of winner take all by state except Maine and Nebraska. 

8 minutes ago, 14ledo81 said:

This is a very interesting topic. If you don't live in the "battleground" states, your vote is probably meaningless.

I just moved from 1 battleground state to another. 

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, CarlSpackler said:

I don't know why we need the electoral college in the modern era. We could easily go with the popular vote. I'm thinking the electoral college was needed back before we had communication systems, so electors were elected to go to D.C. and cast a ballot on behalf of their state. It could also be set up by congressional district instead of winner take all by state except Maine and Nebraska.

Right. That's how I understand it - back when we had to elect people who knew better to represent us, because communication was poor.

It's an outdated method of electing a president. Which party has more to lose by changing it, though? NY/CA tend to go Democrat. Texas tends to go Republican, right?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, iacas said:

Texas tends to go Republican, right?

The last Democrat to win Texas was Jimmy Carter in 1976.

The Electoral College "bumps up" the influence of minority groups (not minorities in the sense of race, just in terms of demographics) focused in a single state. It gives farmers in the Midwest (for example) a relative advantage against urban populations in cities. The argument is that this makes politicians appeal to a wider range of the population.

The technical argument for it is that it significantly decreases the possibility and the logistics of a recount. Just imagine if the situation in Florida with Bush and Gore was extended to the entire US. Disaster.

 

- John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

The technical argument for it is that it significantly decreases the possibility and the logistics of a recount. Just imagine if the situation in Florida with Bush and Gore was extended to the entire US. Disaster.

That makes sense, but I also don't think that's not a problem that can be overcome. Florida was a perfect confluence of:

  • old people
  • poorly designed ballots
  • tech that's 16 years old now
  • a very close race in that state

If you want to keep the electoral votes, why not just apportion them based on the percentages, rounding to whole votes? California might be 35-20, but that's "fairer" than 55-0. No?

Or do you think the electoral college is great and can't be improved upon, John?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I saw a map accompanying a poll the other day that led me to believe that there is only one (Nebraska??) State that does proportional votes.

I could be wrong though.  :)

EDIT:  Quick Wiki search seems to show that Maine also (I was correct about Neb) breaks down their votes, but the other 49 "states" (counting DC) are all to the winner.

I think the whole thing is a bit outdated and unnecessary at this point, but I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, iacas said:

If you want to keep the electoral votes, why not just apportion them based on the percentages, rounding to whole votes? California might be 35-20, but that's "fairer" than 55-0. No?

Nebraska and Maine do that. I actually think that's a better system...it allows states to manage voting tech and still avoids the "nationwide recount" problem.

It's worth noting that there is no direct voting system that can't create crazy paradoxes (where the candidate who loses would have been preferred by more people than the winner). Ranked-choice has this same issue.

Personally, I don't like the Electoral College system because it encourages a two-party system, which I think is detrimental overall.

- John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This sums up what I remember reading about it a long time ago:

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-reason-for-the-electoral-college/

 

Basically in that day and age, they were politely saying that they couldn't trust an uneducated public who may not be capable of electing the right candidate with the information they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Has there been an election in the history of the US when the the electoral college didn't reflect the popular vote?

I believe Bill Clinton won with less than 50% of the popular vote in 1992(?) because of almost 20% of the popular vote going to Ross Perot. But Clinton still received more than each of the other candidates.

In any event, I don't know that it serves any real purpose and puts in place the possibility of an election result that does not reflect what the people want.

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

 

8 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

Has there been an election in the history of the US when the the electoral college didn't reflect the popular vote?

Yes, at least one - Bush v. Gore in 2000. Gore won the popular vote.

I've always heard that one reason for the existence of the EC was that it forced politicians to campaign in less-populated states. Otherwise, candidates would spend all their time and energy in states with the highest populations. Not sure how true that is. I think our system needs to be updated, though.

The Instant Runoff model is a really interesting one. The problem is that our two parties control the system and they don't want to see it change to include more parties. It will take a lot of effort for that to happen. 

 

Edited by drmevo
Link to comment
Share on other sites


48 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

Has there been an election in the history of the US when the the electoral college didn't reflect the popular vote?

I believe Bill Clinton won with less than 50% of the popular vote in 1992(?) because of almost 20% of the popular vote going to Ross Perot. But Clinton still received more than each of the other candidates.

In any event, I don't know that it serves any real purpose and puts in place the possibility of an election result that does not reflect what the people want.

In addition to 2000, it happened in 1824, 1876, and 1888. 

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I would add that the electoral college, in some respects, prevents the more populous states from controlling the results of national elections. I don't think a straight vote count would necessarily be better. States like CA, TX, FL, NY could have a greater influence on the results just because of their size. Imagine candidates only campaigning in those large states and ignoring the low population ones. You wouldn't feel your voice was being heard.

http://www.enchantedlearning.com/usa/states/population.shtml

 

  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

I would add that the electoral college, in some respects, prevents the more populous states from controlling the results of national elections. I don't think a straight vote count would necessarily be better. States like CA, TX, FL, NY could have a greater influence on the results just because of their size. Imagine candidates only campaigning in those large states and ignoring the low population ones. You wouldn't feel your voice was being heard.

http://www.enchantedlearning.com/usa/states/population.shtml

Those states are largely ignored already. Some get only 3, 4, 5 electoral votes. It takes 11-15 of them just to make up for CA.

And since CA would not be 55-0, gaining ground in those states may matter more.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Just now, iacas said:

Those states are largely ignored already. Some get only 3, 4, 5 electoral votes. It takes 11-15 of them just to make up for CA.

And since CA would not be 55-0, gaining ground in those states may matter more.

Agree, but it follows the original ideas of each state representing itself. CA decides who CA wants for president, senate and congress. They only submit one result representing all CA. I'm not saying I approve of the system, I am only stating the intent behind it.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Agree, but it follows the original ideas of each state representing itself. CA decides who CA wants for president, senate and congress. They only submit one result representing all CA. I'm not saying I approve of the system, I am only stating the intent behind it.

And another issue with IRV is it means that all vote-counting needs to be centralized, as I understand it. Logistically, that would be a huge challenge for a country the size of the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 10/21/2016 at 11:32 PM, Gator Hazard said:

This sums up what I remember reading about it a long time ago:

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-reason-for-the-electoral-college/

Basically in that day and age, they were politely saying that they couldn't trust an uneducated public who may not be capable of electing the right candidate with the information they had.

Good read.

On 10/22/2016 at 9:05 AM, iacas said:

Those states are largely ignored already. Some get only 3, 4, 5 electoral votes. It takes 11-15 of them just to make up for CA.

And since CA would not be 55-0, gaining ground in those states may matter more.

The electoral college would probably be better if they didn't have that all or nothing type of result for each state. They should simply count up all the electoral votes and the highest number wins.

Not sure it would change that much though.

Edited by iacas
removed the politics in the spoiler

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2685 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...