Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blackjack Don

More realistic scoring for amateurs

Note: This thread is 988 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

137 posts / 8615 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

You can choose to play pro golf, or you can play amateur golf. 

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them. 

:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

13 minutes ago, Blackjack Don said:

You can choose to play pro golf, or you can play amateur golf. 

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them. 

:-D

1. I don't think pros are disappointed with par. They are still only making 4-5 birdies per round and those are most on the par 5s/easier holes. They play for par on many of the tougher ones.

2. Terrible. You're just lowering the bar. People would eventually get used to that standard and being "better than average" would no longer be satisfying. Another twenty years and someone will want to make every hole a par 6 so we can all shoot 10 under and feel good about ourselves again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

Par is defined (I am paraphrasing out of laziness) The number of shots an EXPERT golfer requires allowing for 2 putts.

My par just happens to be 12 shots more than that. The handicap system is genius in that respect.

Edited by ev780

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As I just said in another thread. I focus on getting the little white ball in the stupid hole in as few strokes as possible no matter what my situation is. The score is what it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've heard this kind of thing before: To give yourself an extra stroke on every hole and make it "par". 

It's okay to be "bad" at golf while you're learning, we don't need to redraw the lines. Compared to some of the fellas on here I might be "bad" for years to come. But I learned to value my humble achievements. If you can consistently break 100 on a Par 72 Course while counting every stroke, you're still light years ahead of the people at the range who are just goofing off. ...At the public courses around here maybe 1/3 of the people are just Godawful, probably couldn't even break 120. So, I'm way better than those. But I don't ever want to give myself credit for pars I didn't make. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are very few golfers who are really bad at the game. Same goes for good golfers. There's very few of them who are really good at the same game. :-P

Myself, I am some where between a 1/2, and 3/4s of a stroke, worse per hole than the really good golfers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Blackjack Don said:

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them.

Sorry, but you'll be disappointed to find that it's not thinking outside the box at all. In fact, golfers originally started out trying to beat "bogey" or "Colonel Bogey" and then as players improved they came up with the term "par" to describe the score an expert player should strive to achieve. Your "outside the box" thinking is actually the way people played the game in the 1800s… ;-)

Also, while your idea is fine as a mindset for the bogey golfer or thereabouts, a lot of people would not really be challenging themselves if they were content with a score around 90. You don't have to be that good to shoot in the upper 70s to low 80s, and you'd be doing yourself a disservice if you considered every hole a par five (or every hole par+1).

So… good for some, but not good for "amateurs" far and wide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Blackjack Don said:

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

Not a bad idea.  I used this system starting out.  5 across the board.   Then I would concentrate on the par 3's to gain a stroke or two, try and handle the par 5's, and treat the 4 as three to get on and two to get in for 5.   Handle the short par 4's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is just semantics.

After a hole, I mark down a number either way. You can call it a double bogey or a six or a one-over average(?). It's the same cruddy hole in my book. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is fun to go back to your old scorecards and see how you've improved. I cherish those moments when I get to circle the number after a hole. It's still not very often, but last summer was better than my first, and this summer will beat 2016.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, Kalnoky said:

It is fun to go back to your old scorecards and see how you've improved. I cherish those moments when I get to circle the number after a hole. It's still not very often, but last summer was better than my first, and this summer will beat 2016.   

I have some first year cards on a shelf in the garage. Yikes and double yikes. I'm not really sure how I kept going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

It is just semantics.

After a hole, I mark down a number either way. You can call it a double bogey or a six or a one-over average(?). It's the same cruddy hole in my book. 

I agree that it can be a bit more than semantics.

People place importance on par. If I call a 475-yard hole a par four, people will be disappointed with a 5. Call it a par 5 and they'll be happy with a 5.

The "number" can affect the type of shot someone chooses too. If they're 230 out on a "par 4" surrounded by sand, they might hit their 3W. If they're 230 out on a "par 5" they'll probably hit a shot that keeps them short of the monstrous, disastrous greenside bunkers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, iacas said:

The "number" can affect the type of shot someone chooses too. If they're 230 out on a "par 4" surrounded by sand, they might hit their 3W. If they're 230 out on a "par 5" they'll probably hit a shot that keeps them short of the monstrous, disastrous greenside bunkers.

Just curious, would you advocate approaching the shot the same in both scenarios?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Wanzo said:

Just curious, would you advocate approaching the shot the same in both scenarios?

Yes.

But most people cannot and do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, mcanadiens said:

I have some first year cards on a shelf in the garage. Yikes and double yikes. I'm not really sure how I kept going.

Oh man, me too. I shudder when I remember those very early days. I could've called an 8 a par, but I know what the poor guys who got stuck playing with me called it.  Man, did I ever underestimate this game.

Edited by Kalnoky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, Kalnoky said:

Oh man, me too. I shudder when I remember those very early days. I could've called an 8 a par, but I know what the poor guys who got stuck playing with me called it.  Man, did I ever underestimate this game.

Yeah, I remember those days as well. . .Or rather, my daughter reminds me of the time(s) I nearly hit her twice in the same shot when the ball bounced off a tree hit the golf cart she was standing next to then went up about 50 feet then landed right by her feet. My memory is pretty bad about these things, but my daughter remembers everything. . .:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Par on every hole is an arbitrary number. In the end what matters is the total score (either net or gross), and strokes over or under par is just a convenient way to compare those scores. The goal of each hole, regardless of the par rating, is to get the ball into the hole in as few strokes as possible.

Because of this, changing the par rating doesn't really change much at all. You still shoot the same score as before, and I don't think you'd get any more satisfaction by raising the par to 90. You'd just see that the expert players were shooting nearly 30 under par in a round, compared to your even par round, and feel similar to how you do now. Those are my thoughts anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting thoughts. I don't have much to add to the original post. I'd like to see some 1kind of a separation between pro golf and amateur golf. Thirty under par? Seriously?

Why shouldn't the average golfer have a realistic score to shoot for? How many out there would be happy to move forward to beat the number? They have no chance of ever beating the number at par. But they should be expected to. It's just a different game, and there should be a way to separate the two. If five is a good score for every hole, then maybe people would play the course with the LSW-like ways, instead of being frustrated they can't go for the green in two all the time? Like the pros.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 988 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • 4.5 hours being considered fine is just an American view of the game  I think most Americans would find themselves unwelcome if they didnt adjust to the pace in their weekly rounds elsewhere in the world.
    • Played yesterday and today.  Didn't go so well yesterday as I shot a 106 yesterday as my driver was just all over the place and my ball striking overall left a lot to be desired.  Had 4 GIRs, however, 3 were on the front which was a general theme as shot 49 on the front and 57 on the back. Score: 106 CR/Slope: 71.6/121 2 Pars 5 Bogeys 3 DB 6 TB 1 Quad-Bogey View this round on GAME GOLF   Today I was able to bounce back and although I shot 100, I had control over my driver, was moving the ball right to left or straight off the tee and my ball striking felt better.  2 holes ended up doing me in, though.  After starting with 3 bogeys, which really should have included 1 par, and a double bogey, on the par 3 4th hole, I pushed a 7I right  and subsequently overdrew the ball on my reload and missed short and right on a brutal front right location location on a green that slopped severely from back right to front left.  Over-hit my chip shot that went all the way to the back right of the green, had to chip on and then 3 putt for an 8.  On the Par 4 14th hole, I overdrew 2 tee shots with my 3H OB.  Then chipped out, leaving myself 100 yards, took a three-quarter swing with a 52 degree wedge and left it short right.  Flag was on the front right and I thinned my chip shot, leaving it on the back left of the green.  I then 3 putt for a 10.  That said, drained a few longish putts, but my short game, putter notwithstanding, was brutal as I failed to leave myself any gimmies when chipping.  That said, had another birdie and a few pars so there are definitely positives to take away from the round. Score: 100 CR/Slope: 70.4/124 Birdie: 1 Pars: 3 Bogeys: 6 DB: 6 Others: 2 View this round on GAME GOLF 4 rounds in four days - first time I've been able to do that and it was AWESOME!  Shot 95, 95, 106, 100 so, not too shabby for me. 
    • thank you...already loaded up on TM clubs :/...that being said, I've been working on my tee shot and was wondering how much range time is too much?  have had my M2 driver for about 5 days...have hit about 250ish balls with it already...too much?
    • Yep.  Lagavulin is another.  The Isle of Islay scotches are unique.  A lot of people don’t like the peat and astringent iodine.  Good stuff, but not a beginners whisky!   
    • A towel is an unneeded accessory? Once again, I'm not sure you read things before you reply.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CSkipr
      CSkipr
      (72 years old)
    2. David in FL
      David in FL
      (61 years old)
    3. LaserBeam
      LaserBeam
      (63 years old)
    4. Ratcatcher
      Ratcatcher
      (66 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...