Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blackjack Don

More realistic scoring for amateurs

Note: This thread is 988 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

137 posts / 8609 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

You can choose to play pro golf, or you can play amateur golf. 

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them. 

:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

13 minutes ago, Blackjack Don said:

You can choose to play pro golf, or you can play amateur golf. 

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them. 

:-D

1. I don't think pros are disappointed with par. They are still only making 4-5 birdies per round and those are most on the par 5s/easier holes. They play for par on many of the tougher ones.

2. Terrible. You're just lowering the bar. People would eventually get used to that standard and being "better than average" would no longer be satisfying. Another twenty years and someone will want to make every hole a par 6 so we can all shoot 10 under and feel good about ourselves again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

Par is defined (I am paraphrasing out of laziness) The number of shots an EXPERT golfer requires allowing for 2 putts.

My par just happens to be 12 shots more than that. The handicap system is genius in that respect.

Edited by ev780

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As I just said in another thread. I focus on getting the little white ball in the stupid hole in as few strokes as possible no matter what my situation is. The score is what it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've heard this kind of thing before: To give yourself an extra stroke on every hole and make it "par". 

It's okay to be "bad" at golf while you're learning, we don't need to redraw the lines. Compared to some of the fellas on here I might be "bad" for years to come. But I learned to value my humble achievements. If you can consistently break 100 on a Par 72 Course while counting every stroke, you're still light years ahead of the people at the range who are just goofing off. ...At the public courses around here maybe 1/3 of the people are just Godawful, probably couldn't even break 120. So, I'm way better than those. But I don't ever want to give myself credit for pars I didn't make. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are very few golfers who are really bad at the game. Same goes for good golfers. There's very few of them who are really good at the same game. :-P

Myself, I am some where between a 1/2, and 3/4s of a stroke, worse per hole than the really good golfers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Blackjack Don said:

Recently in another thread I stated that I believe pros and amateurs are actually playing a different game. We might be close at two feet from the hole, and their chances of making a thirty foot putt aren't any better than ours, but that's about it. They are disappointed with par. I can't manage more than a couple in a row. We simply aren't playing the same stakes. 

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

I like people who think outside the box. Traditionalists should wear knickers so we can identify them.

Sorry, but you'll be disappointed to find that it's not thinking outside the box at all. In fact, golfers originally started out trying to beat "bogey" or "Colonel Bogey" and then as players improved they came up with the term "par" to describe the score an expert player should strive to achieve. Your "outside the box" thinking is actually the way people played the game in the 1800s… ;-)

Also, while your idea is fine as a mindset for the bogey golfer or thereabouts, a lot of people would not really be challenging themselves if they were content with a score around 90. You don't have to be that good to shoot in the upper 70s to low 80s, and you'd be doing yourself a disservice if you considered every hole a par five (or every hole par+1).

So… good for some, but not good for "amateurs" far and wide.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Blackjack Don said:

Yesterday I heard a suggestion I really like a lot. Every hole is a five. Just count strokes. 18 holes, average is 90. Above or below average? This seems to me to be a much better way of scoring a golf game for amateurs. Much more realistic, and could be more fun than making lots of double bogeys.

Not a bad idea.  I used this system starting out.  5 across the board.   Then I would concentrate on the par 3's to gain a stroke or two, try and handle the par 5's, and treat the 4 as three to get on and two to get in for 5.   Handle the short par 4's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is just semantics.

After a hole, I mark down a number either way. You can call it a double bogey or a six or a one-over average(?). It's the same cruddy hole in my book. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is fun to go back to your old scorecards and see how you've improved. I cherish those moments when I get to circle the number after a hole. It's still not very often, but last summer was better than my first, and this summer will beat 2016.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, Kalnoky said:

It is fun to go back to your old scorecards and see how you've improved. I cherish those moments when I get to circle the number after a hole. It's still not very often, but last summer was better than my first, and this summer will beat 2016.   

I have some first year cards on a shelf in the garage. Yikes and double yikes. I'm not really sure how I kept going.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

It is just semantics.

After a hole, I mark down a number either way. You can call it a double bogey or a six or a one-over average(?). It's the same cruddy hole in my book. 

I agree that it can be a bit more than semantics.

People place importance on par. If I call a 475-yard hole a par four, people will be disappointed with a 5. Call it a par 5 and they'll be happy with a 5.

The "number" can affect the type of shot someone chooses too. If they're 230 out on a "par 4" surrounded by sand, they might hit their 3W. If they're 230 out on a "par 5" they'll probably hit a shot that keeps them short of the monstrous, disastrous greenside bunkers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, iacas said:

The "number" can affect the type of shot someone chooses too. If they're 230 out on a "par 4" surrounded by sand, they might hit their 3W. If they're 230 out on a "par 5" they'll probably hit a shot that keeps them short of the monstrous, disastrous greenside bunkers.

Just curious, would you advocate approaching the shot the same in both scenarios?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Wanzo said:

Just curious, would you advocate approaching the shot the same in both scenarios?

Yes.

But most people cannot and do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, mcanadiens said:

I have some first year cards on a shelf in the garage. Yikes and double yikes. I'm not really sure how I kept going.

Oh man, me too. I shudder when I remember those very early days. I could've called an 8 a par, but I know what the poor guys who got stuck playing with me called it.  Man, did I ever underestimate this game.

Edited by Kalnoky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, Kalnoky said:

Oh man, me too. I shudder when I remember those very early days. I could've called an 8 a par, but I know what the poor guys who got stuck playing with me called it.  Man, did I ever underestimate this game.

Yeah, I remember those days as well. . .Or rather, my daughter reminds me of the time(s) I nearly hit her twice in the same shot when the ball bounced off a tree hit the golf cart she was standing next to then went up about 50 feet then landed right by her feet. My memory is pretty bad about these things, but my daughter remembers everything. . .:-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Par on every hole is an arbitrary number. In the end what matters is the total score (either net or gross), and strokes over or under par is just a convenient way to compare those scores. The goal of each hole, regardless of the par rating, is to get the ball into the hole in as few strokes as possible.

Because of this, changing the par rating doesn't really change much at all. You still shoot the same score as before, and I don't think you'd get any more satisfaction by raising the par to 90. You'd just see that the expert players were shooting nearly 30 under par in a round, compared to your even par round, and feel similar to how you do now. Those are my thoughts anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting thoughts. I don't have much to add to the original post. I'd like to see some 1kind of a separation between pro golf and amateur golf. Thirty under par? Seriously?

Why shouldn't the average golfer have a realistic score to shoot for? How many out there would be happy to move forward to beat the number? They have no chance of ever beating the number at par. But they should be expected to. It's just a different game, and there should be a way to separate the two. If five is a good score for every hole, then maybe people would play the course with the LSW-like ways, instead of being frustrated they can't go for the green in two all the time? Like the pros.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 988 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • The best courses in my opinion are the ones where there is risk and reward. Courses with hazards that penalize wayward shots. Courses with  tight fairways and graded rough. Course where if you miss the fairway by 3 yds you still have a shot at the green but if you are way off line you have to take some medicine or take some risks/ get creative. Bomb and gouge is boring AF.  Courses I really like watching golf at are Augusta, Bay Hill, le Golf National, Wentworth, Pebble Beach( but set up with tough rough), Valderrama.  I want to see birdies and eagles on a Sunday, but I also want to see drama and target golf courses don’t always deliver. I want to see shots from deep in the shit, from behind trees, blind approaches, bad bounces and balls in the water. I want players to have more than way to skin a course, not just Driver wedge, driver wedge. I don’t care what the winning score is to par as such, but if the course is hard and fair I believe it gives the best golf to watch and the best drama too.     
    • Best part about 12 holes is you get to hit the local watering hole after your round and respond to those nosy patrons that you shot a 68.  No need to tell them you were 20 over par... 😊
    • Spent time this past weekend doing my annual club/bag cleaning. I wipe down my clubs after every shot. During my golf year, about every couple of months they get get a more thorough cleaning. All this cleaning helps with longevity.  This weekend's work involved cleaning grips, and buffing the the club heads. I use dish detergent, and a light scratch pad on the grips, which helps to regain some of the tackiness to them. Gets the accumulated oil, and grime off of them.  I buff the heads to regain the lost luster. Just making them shiny again. I put my groove cleaner to good work. I pay close attention to the soles, to see how perpendicular the scratch lines are to the club face. This gives me a little info on my impact position.  Cleaning my bag is an adventure in itself. Old, forgotten snack bars that made their way to bottom of the bag. That, and lost change, and forgotten trash. I found my favorite divot tool that I thought I lost at Bandon Dunes a few months ago.  Everything gets taken out, and cleaned. Trash gets thrown away. The compartments get vacuumed. The zippers get some very light (Vaseline) lube. I check all the seams, and connecting points for stitching repairs as needed. Strap connections get a thorough look see. Electronic stuff gets new batteries.  I also clean, and repair the 5 head covers I use. They tend to get a little dirty. I use puppet heads on my metal woods. The "Big Dog" (St.Bernard) cover required a little stitching.  Good thing my wife tought me how to stitch with out poking my fingers too many times. Proper tools makes this an easy chore.   The last thing I do is give the outside of the bag a good wipe down, with a light coating of Amor All. Then I set it out in the sun to dry off, followed by another wipe down.   Once the cleaning is all done, I do the restocking of clubs, tees, balls, divot tools,  ball marker coins, rags, shoes, gps, lazer, extra batteries,  blank score cards, and anything else I think I might need. One of the larger compartments stays empty for that spur of the moment stuff, that might require an ice block. Like others, I always seem to miss that "NO OUTSIDE COOLERS, FOOD, OR BEVERSGES ALLOWED" signage.    As I said previously. Clean tools, properly maintained, last longer. I'd also hate to think I lost a stroke or two, due to a slippery grip, or dirty club head. 
    • 1. Inconsistent pre shot routines 2. Chatting too much 3. Playing to quickly
    • I carry mainly so don’t want too much extra weight.  1 13xclubs 2 6xballs 3 2xgloves 4 Bag of tees 5 Pencil 6 Sharpie marker 7 Pitchmark repair tool and ball marker 8 Towel 9 Rules book 10 Spare card of the course 11 Waterproof jacket ( if the W forecast is really bad) 12 Umbrella (as above) 13 Drink 14 Snack        
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. adamlevine
      adamlevine
      (25 years old)
    2. don28
      don28
      (51 years old)
    3. pope1086
      pope1086
      (33 years old)
    4. rosemiche
      rosemiche
      (5 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...