Jump to content
IGNORED

Modernized Rules Discussion: Areas of the Course


iacas
Note:Β This thread is 2404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic.Β Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Just now, iacas said:

I don't think it will make the game faster. I think the opposite is true, particularly at courses where the flagstick isn't solidly sticking out of the middle of the hole.

It has more to do with the fundamental change to how golf is played, and how muchΒ easier it will become to make putts from inside 6', and the ripple effect of every putt outside of that range - if a 6' becomes almost a gimme, you can be even more careless about your putts from outside 10' and more.

Β 

That's fair, and I fully admitted the potential gain in pace of play would be more than offset by how it would play out in real life. I was just curious as to your rationale behind wanting to avoid making it easier, which you provided with the second sentence there.

8 minutes ago, iacas said:

There aren't a ton of published studies (there's Dave Pelz's, my unpublished stuff from last fall, Mike's video, the video @david_wedzikΒ and I will make as soon as we can, and…), but it won't take many to make the point.

Β 

I will say that the Dave Pelz study will probably be one of the more useful ones to point out, simply because it lends outside credibility to your argument. I understand data is data, but people tend to listen better when multiple reputable sources are providing the data and information. Dave Pelz is a second highly reputable source that will essentially back up the information provided by you (the first highly reputable source).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

28 minutes ago, iacas said:

TakingΒ the flagstick out once per hole and putting it back in once per hole is as fast as it can get, except for thoseΒ rareΒ times when someone could benefit from not walking 80'.

Β 

Or except for those common situations of playing ready golf and putting before everyone reaches the green.

28 minutes ago, iacas said:

She could have tended the flagstick on her way past.

I've never seen anyone do that. Β However, in that situation that would have been slower. Β I would have had to wait for her to get to the flagstick. Β Instead she was on her way to her ball when I putted.

Β 

28 minutes ago, iacas said:

Maybe in fairy tale land. In the real world, it's going to slow down play.

Fairy tale land as declared/dismissed by you. Β I'm apparently not the only one that thinks there is the potential of saving time, i.e. the USGA. Β Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Β Why not try the rule out for a probational period and then evaluate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
9 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

Or except for those common situations of playing ready golf and putting before everyone reaches the green.

I think you're over-stating how often that happens, and under-appreciating how often people will be taking it out and putting it back in.

9 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

In that situation that would have been slower. Β I would have had to wait for her to get to the flagstick. Β Instead she was on her way to her ball when I putted.

It would not have been much slower.

And it required a situation where you were done reading your putt, had your putter, etc. before she was even onΒ the green. That too is rare.

9 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

Fairy tale land as declared/dismissed by you. Β I'm apparently not the only one that thinks there is the potential of saving time, i.e. the USGA. Β Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Β Why not try the rule out for a probational period and then evaluate?

What makes you think we didn't do that? I ran a few of my kids through some simulations at Myrtle Beach. The only time it was consistently faster was when everyone just agreed to leave the flagstick in for everything. The second fastest: take it out once, put it back once.

Sometimes you can create situations like yours where the new rule would prove beneficial, but those, in my experience, are more than offset by multiple other situations that are more common. Again, what if your wife wanted the flagstick out for her chips, but you wanted it in for your putts? Or vice versa? I can create scenarios, too.

Additionally, you can create simulations to model the real world, and I believe they'd demonstrate that the current rule is actually faster.

The USGA seems to be completely unaware of the changes this would make to putting. They were on record, I believe, as saying "this will never really affect a PGA Tour player because they have a caddie to attend the flagstick." They seem to be completely missing out on the idea that the PGA Tour player will instruct his caddie not to attend the flagstick, even from 4' away.


Here's the thing, too… even if it were shown to speed up play (what, a few seconds per hole)… I'd oppose the rules change due to how much easier itΒ would make putting.

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Approaching the pin from different positions on the course, whether on the green or not, result in different advantages or disadvantages. Β Is it inequitable that one golfer approaches the hole from 90* across a steep slope when another hasΒ a simple putt straight up the fall line? Β Of course not, it'sΒ part of the game.

To be clear, I agree with youΒ and dislike the proposed new rule. Β I hope it doesn't survive. Β I just don't find that particular argument compelling and think that it detracts from the otherwise strong points you make.

My .02 worth.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;Β  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;Β  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's; Β 56-14 F grind andΒ 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty CameronΒ Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Approaching the pin from different positions on the course, whether on the green or not, result in different advantages or disadvantages. Β Is it inequitable that one golfer approaches the hole from 90* across a steep slope when another hasΒ a simple putt straight up the fall line? Β Of course not, it'sΒ part of the game.

You're missing the point that a simple hole is more equitable than different flagsticks, different directions of leaning, etc. I'm not using "equitable" the way the Rules of Golf do, I'm using it the way the English language uses it.

The golf course architect doesn't design a hole to govern which direction a flagstick should lean, or what material the flagstick should be made out of, when designing the course. Those are design elements, andΒ the golfer can and/or should be aware of them. Stretching that to includeΒ the inequities involved with different materials, different thicknesses, different leans, etc. is stretching it too far. I get what you're saying, but it's stretched too far to be reasonable, IMO.

If the new flagstick rule was implemented, we'd see manufacturers following the letter of the law (which are surprisingly thin re: the flagstick dimensions, material, etc.) while saying "make more putts with our flagsticks" - they'd "dampen" as much as allowed, or be "sticky" somewhat, or lightly textured perhaps, and they'd be the "ideal" thickness for helping to make putts… etc.Β It'd be a shit show that fundamentally changes the game from one where we putt into a hole into one where we hit into a trapping/deflecting target.

It'd be more like disc golf. Disc golf putting is too easy. You can whip the disc at the basket, or lob it in. Either way it goes in. There have been calls for years to make putting in disc golf tougher.

2 minutes ago, David in FL said:

To be clear, I agree with youΒ and dislike the proposed new rule. Β I hope it doesn't survive. Β I just don't find that particular argument compelling and think that it detracts from the otherwise strong points you make.

It's not one of the strongest two points, but I think it deserves merit.

We play to a hole - holes are essentially uniform in golf. The material, lean, thickness, etc. of the flagstick should not have a dramatic effect on play. It would if this rule was instituted.

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

We play to a hole - holes are essentially uniform in golf. The material, lean, thickness, etc. of the flagstick should not have a dramatic effect on play. It would if this rule was instituted.

THIS ^ isΒ my entire objection to the proposed rule.Β  It completely changes the nature of the game.Β  It'd be like making the backboard concave in basketball...the goal is no longer to get the ball through a hoop; it's to just kinda hit a certain point and use that to make the ball go in.

I agree that it makes putting easier, but that isn't my objection.Β  Heck, I'd be more likely to support a rule that enlarged the hole to 5" than one that allows the flagstick to stay in.

I agree that it will not speed up play, either.Β  But, again, not my objection.

I just don't see any advantage to the new rule...UNLESS they also mandate that the flagstick is a certain size and it is semi-permanently fixed (ie, screwed in or something).Β Β I still disagree, but at least that would make it more palatable.

Β 

- John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Here's the thing, too… even if it were shown to speed up play (what, a few seconds per hole)… I'd oppose the rules change due to how much easier itΒ would make putting.

This is my objection too, and I let the USGA and R&A know in the feedback website they have set up. As a decent putter, I would lose whatever small advantage I have in mastering the putting skill, so would fall further behind...

For the pros, all the records would become meaningless as they could treat a 5-6 footer just like they treat a 3 footer now, with 99% going in. As you said, that affects the rest of putting, particularly lag putting, a lot!

Philippe

:callaway:Β Maverick Driver,Β 3W, 5W Big BerthaΒ 
:mizuno:Β JPX 900 Forged 4-GW
:mizuno:Β  T7 55-09 and 60-10Β forged wedges,
:odyssey:Β #7 putter (Slim 3.0 grip)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I've started a change.org petition and a website:

I encourage people to check out both. Sign the latter, and share it. Visit and share the former with all of your golfing friends.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Make your case in half as many words.Β :-)

"Age improves with wine."
Β 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
5 minutes ago, Asheville said:

Make your case in half as many words.Β :-)

The change.org case is very short.

Here: "Leaving the flagstick in makes putting significantly easier."

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

While I don't agree that leaving the flagstick in is such a travesty, you will make your case better by being less wordy.

I've been reading you here for few years and you "talk" too much! That said, I'm a fan and do manage to wade through most of your lengthy posts.Β 

Three paragraphs. What do you want. Briefly why. Restate what you want.Β :-)

Edited by Asheville
"Age improves with wine."
Β 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB
Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, Asheville said:

While I don't agree that leaving the flagstick in is such a travesty, you will make your case better by being less wordy.

Sorry if you can't understand a concise information.Β :-P

7 minutes ago, Asheville said:

Three paragraphs. What do you want. Briefly why. Restate what you want.Β :-)

What are you, some grade school English teacher?Β 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
Β fasdfaΒ dfdsafΒ 

What's in My Bag
Driver;Β :pxg:Β 0311 Gen 5,Β  3-Wood:Β 
:titleist:Β 917h3 ,Β  Hybrid:Β  :titleist:Β 915 2-Hybrid,Β  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel:Β (52, 56, 60),Β  Putter: :edel:,Β  Ball: :snell:Β MTB,Β Β Shoe: :true_linkswear:,Β  Rangfinder:Β :leupold:
Bag:Β :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
14 minutes ago, Asheville said:

While I don't agree that leaving the flagstick in is such a travesty, you will make your case better by being less wordy.

I've been reading you here for few years and you "talk" too much! That said, I'm a fan and do manage to wade through most of your lengthy posts.Β 

Three paragraphs. What do you want. Briefly why. Restate what you want.Β :-)

Thanks for the advice.

It's pretty damn short.

It's five paragraphs, and the first and last are only one sentence.

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Asheville said:

While I don't agree that leaving the flagstick in is such a travesty, you will make your case better by being less wordy.

Β 

It's not really wordy at all. It shows what the USGA says in a quote, then provides a rebuttal. Context is established, and then an argument is made.Β 

It's not some 100,000 word thesis, it's just a couple of choice quotes and an argument against their points. It honestly took me less than five minutes to read over the "why it's bad" and the "background information" sections on the website.

If you want short content without substance, look to twitter. If you want to see, in a brief format, the locus of the website you can look at the very concise content on the home page. If you want to understand why they're taking their stance against the rule and see the evidence they're basing their argument upon, you're going to need to have a little bit of room to explain and that's why those are separate from the main page that gets the point across in a short and sweet fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, iacas said:

No collision between flagstick and ball will be an elastic one, so as long as the Rules allow a flagstick to be 0.5" or thinner at the level of the green, it will be easier to putt from shorter distances with the flagstick in than out.

But doesn't this also imply that any excessive advantage could be eliminated by simply using thicker flagsticks? Here is one test one Superintendent did with different size (and material) flagsticks:

http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/holen/article/2008jun22.pdf

Quote

After 300 balls were sent through the pipe, the results were in. With the flagstick we were using (three-quarter-inch tapered), 67 percent of the balls fell into the cup. With the half-inch flagstick, 72 percent of the balls fell into the hole.....The biggest shock of all was that with the one-inch flagsticks, no balls fell into the hole. That's right, none. It's hard to imagine there would be such a big difference, especially since the bottom 12 inches of all three flagsticks is exactly the same width (half-inch) and made of fiberglass.

If a thicker flagstick eliminates the advantage of leaving the flagstick in (don't think this test is comprehensive enough to say for sure unless it has been repeated elsewhere), then wouldn't that also eliminate the need to retain a penalty for hitting the stick?

And even if they don't actually regulate the flagstick, I think it's pretty much the job of course designers and superintendents to make sure a course is setup in a way that provides reasonable challenges which reward golfing skill. So I think better courses, if this change were made, might simply gravitate towards using flagsticks which provide no significant advantage when left in on puts, (and would thus eliminate as well the same advantage that is currently already being provided on chips).Β 

Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


11 hours ago, iacas said:

An email (draft) that I plan to send to a few people at the USGA…

Thoughts?

Maybe mention that one of the principles of the game is that the player must play the ball all the way into the hole without assistance. Β Leaving the flagstick in the hole for putting seems to me to assist the player considerably. Β I can't help but think that the original prohibition was instituted at least in part because of that factor.

  • Upvote 2

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Sorry if you can't understand a concise information.Β :-P

What are you, some grade school English teacher?Β 

An important part of my job was technical writing. Less is more.Β ;-)

"Age improves with wine."
Β 
Wishon 919THI 11*
Wishon 925HL 4w
Wishon 335HL 3h & 4h
Wishon 755pc 5i, 6i, 7i, 8i & 9i
Tad Moore 485 PW
Callaway X 54*
Ping G2 Anser C
Callaway SuperSoft
Titleist StaDry
Kangaroo Hillcrest AB
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
6 hours ago, acerimusdux said:

But doesn't this also imply that any excessive advantage could be eliminated by simply using thicker flagsticks? Here is one test one Superintendent did with different size (and material) flagsticks:

http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/holen/article/2008jun22.pdf

Why would any course use flagsticks that helped prevent the ball from going in the hole. The members complained because they occasionally wouldΒ chipΒ a ball andΒ the heavy, thicker flagstick would keep the ball out - they'd bitch to the high heavens if they hit it all the time putting and it kept the ball out.

This is what we say atΒ the bottom of the page - the flagstick manufacturers will rush to manufacture flagsticks that lead to "hole more putts with our flagsticks!" That's not the way golf should be.

6 hours ago, acerimusdux said:

If a thicker flagstick eliminates the advantage of leaving the flagstick in (don't think this test is comprehensive enough to say for sure unless it has been repeated elsewhere), then wouldn't that also eliminate the need to retain a penalty for hitting the stick?

No, because no course operators in their right minds would use such flagsticks. Heck, the story there is that they didn't even want to use themΒ beforeΒ this rules change, just the few times they'd chip and hit the pin.

6 hours ago, acerimusdux said:

And even if they don't actually regulate the flagstick, I think it's pretty much the job of course designers and superintendents to make sure a course is setup in a way that provides reasonable challenges which reward golfing skill. So I think better courses, if this change were made, might simply gravitate towards using flagsticks which provide no significant advantage when left in on puts, (and would thus eliminate as well the same advantage that is currently already being provided on chips).

I don't think anyone's going to do that. Courses are going to keep their current flagsticks or upgrade to the "hole more putts" variety that would surely be produced within the boundaries of the rules/regulations.

4 hours ago, Fourputt said:

Maybe mention that one of the principles of the game is that the player must play the ball all the way into the hole without assistance. Β Leaving the flagstick in the hole for putting seems to me to assist the player considerably. Β I can't help but think that the original prohibition was instituted at least in part because of that factor.

Thanks. I'll fit it in if I can and it doesn't make it too "wordy". ;-)

18 minutes ago, Asheville said:

An important part of my job was technical writing. Less is more.

@Asheville, you have to write enough to make your point. I disagree that the site is "wordy."

An important part of my job for 20 years as an author (for magazines, for websites, for a book), as editor (ditto),Β and as a technical editor for others authoring books and articles (I tech edited over 50 computer-related books)Β has also been to fit stuff into the proper sized space. I feel I've done that with the site, for the large part. Well enough for a first draft anyway.

I can definitely get wordy here on the forum. I don't feel I did there.Β It's a "microsite" that explains and explores one thing. But it has to explore that one thing. It can't just say "this is a bad proposed rule because we think this is true."

Erik J. Barzeski β€” β›³Β I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. πŸŒπŸΌβ€β™‚οΈ
Director of InstructionΒ Golf EvolutionΒ β€’Β Owner,Β The Sand Trap .comΒ β€’Β Author,Β Lowest Score Wins
Golf DigestΒ "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17Β &Β "Best in State" 2017-20Β β€’ WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019Β :edel:Β :true_linkswear:

Check Out:Β New TopicsΒ |Β TST BlogΒ |Β Golf TermsΒ |Β Instructional ContentΒ |Β AnalyzrΒ |Β LSWΒ | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note:Β This thread is 2404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic.Β Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • We do not buy extended warranties. We will use one of our credit cards for the purchase that extends the warranty "x 2". Our thoughts are: a. if the item is a lemon, it will likely break right away and we can attempt to apply the original warranty or credit card extension. b. over the long haul, we will probably save more money by not purchasing the extended warranty and fixing/junking broken items out of our own pocket. The important thing is to keep some records of purchases so one may make a claim under the manufacturer's warranty. I recently sent back some Footjoy shoes for leaking and Footjoy did a reat job of making the claim process work very well. I had the original receipt, warrant info and box. Easy peasy.
    • First one. Drinks on me! Wordle 1,013 1/6 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • This is pretty much how I look at it.Β  I understand there are times when the piece of mind has value. I think over the long haul I'm money ahead by never buying the extended warrantee. Hell, What do I know? I went to Ch!cago PubIic SchooIs.Β 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 🟩⬜🟨⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟩🟩⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,013 3/6* 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩⬜🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...