Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
33 minutes ago, golfnz34me said:

I'm firmly in the "These should be outlawed camp".  Any Tom, Dick, or Harry caddy can get sufficiently accurate yardages for their pro.  Allowing DMDs wouldn't change that fact.  Green reading, however, is an art/skill, and can vary wildly from one pro to the next.  Shouldn't the pro who excels at green reading have an advantage over the less skilled pro?  Isn't that what we want?  I HATE that these books nearly eliminate that element of the game.

That's only really valid if the books provide much help.

Do you think they do? I'm not sure.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It seems like the USGA / R&A can only eliminate the use of these books during the round.  If I was a touring pro playing the same 30 courses every year for millions of dollars, I'd still figure out a way to get a hold of the laser scan data for all these greens to use in my preparation for the tournament and in my practice rounds.  I'd also tell my caddy to memorize what he could.  If can't use them during the actual tournament, at least can memorize the general slope of the green to aid in reading of the green.

John


21 hours ago, iacas said:

No. And that's the entire point I'm making: distances are considered public information, slope is not.

I know better than argue with the site owner but it sure seems that people only have an issue if someone else writes it down. If a caddy went out after play or during practice round and wrote notes then that would be ok?

Again I can't really see the difference between a green book, a yardage map, a pin sheet, or even labeled sprinkler heads. These things are constants and do not vary substantially day to day thus public information.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

At the Professional and USGA Championship level or World Tours, players are competing for very large $$ and honors.
They certainly seek any knowledge of unfamiliar courses and most will play practice rounds prior to events.
Having notes or yardage books has always been acceptable and within the rules.

So I ask "why now is any knowledge of information" in the game an issue when the info is available to all?

The game still boils down to the player executing every shot better the field of opponents.
 

 

Edited by Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
14 minutes ago, Club Rat said:

So I ask "why now is any knowledge of information" in the game an issue when the info is available to all?

I think the traditional yardage books use information that can be obtained using traditional means, stepping off distances, and visually evaluating terrain features.  I know they're now done using more sophisticated means, but you COULD do it the old-fashioned way.  These old-fashioned procedures would be allowed during the round.

The green books, based on what I see in the OP,  require the use of level surveying equipment with specific software to develop the topographic mapping, possibly combined with digital levels on the ground itself to record the specific slope (or they use the software to evaluate slope from the topo mapping at specific points).  These REQUIRE the use of devices which would never be allowable during a round of golf.  I see this requirement to use sophisticated equipment as the reason that green books are looked upon differently from a typical yardage book.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

that green books are looked upon differently from a typical yardage book.

A book is a book, if some have pictures while others have diagrams, they are still available to all regardless of the means to produce the information.

The USGA already has limitations to modern technology in equipment which controls a small aspect of the game.
Am I confusing the ban as allowing devices to indicate slope/grade while playing, or is it just a ban on a product "the green book" ?

I probably need to go back and read the article.  :-O

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 minute ago, Club Rat said:

Am I confusing the ban as allowing devices to indicate slope/grade while playing, or is it just a ban on a product "the green book" ?

I probably need to go back and read the article.  :-O

At this stage, its not a ban on anything.  The statement just says that they're a little concerned about these green books, so they're going to study the matter.  I agree with you, I'm not sure how they're going to draw a line between a traditional yardage book and these (relatively newly developed) green books.  I intended my explanation above to address the difference between the two, and why the green books might be looked at differently.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, DaveP043 said:

 I intended my explanation above to address the difference between the two

Thanks, that clears my assumption. :-)

 

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

At this stage, its not a ban on anything.  The statement just says that they're a little concerned about these green books, so they're going to study the matter.  I agree with you, I'm not sure how they're going to draw a line between a traditional yardage book and these (relatively newly developed) green books.  I intended my explanation above to address the difference between the two, and why the green books might be looked at differently.

It may come down to something as simple as what the information is and how it's obtained.  It's one thing to have a diagram of the green with some squiggly lines and arrows to show the general trends, something anyone can do just by spending a little time rolling balls.  It's quite another when the diagram shows the precise slope angles/percentages obtained with the laser based measuring techniques that surveyors use.

Distance measurement was always available by something as simple as pacing it off - anyone could do it.  Current EMD's simply make that process simpler, but they don't really tell you anything new - it's still something that anyone can do. 

Anyone can also make a green chart by walking the green and rolling a few balls.  That will give you some basic information which is really no different from what can be obtained simply by playing a few practice rounds.  It's when it moves into the realm of extreme technical assistance to provide precise detailed information which cannot be obtained through normal play or practice that the question comes into play. 

Just saying that the player still needs to hit the putt doesn't really address the underlying issue.  If he has this information which he could not have obtained through practice or play, and then scores better because he is better able to interpret the chart than the next guy rather than because he is the better putter, then you start to get into a foggy area of skill vs. technology.  

In my opinion, the game is far enough down that road already.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it is going to be very hard for the USGA and R&A to legislate what goes into a yardage book.  I know we are discussing "green books" but it would be too easy to transcribe what is in those books into the yardage book.  At that point, what happens?  Does the rules officials have to inspect every document/yardage book before play?  Will they allow pictures of greens but not slope lines or intent to show slope?

Just don't see an easy solution.  If this is simply to speed up play then enforcing pace of play rules is a much better avenue...and I mean ACTUALLY enforcing them.

  • Upvote 1

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, NCGolfer said:

I think it is going to be very hard for the USGA and R&A to legislate what goes into a yardage book.  I know we are discussing "green books" but it would be too easy to transcribe what is in those books into the yardage book.  At that point, what happens?  Does the rules officials have to inspect every document/yardage book before play?  Will they allow pictures of greens but not slope lines or intent to show slope?

Just don't see an easy solution.  If this is simply to speed up play then enforcing pace of play rules is a much better avenue...and I mean ACTUALLY enforcing them.

Agree - Probably can't govern what goes in the book.  They could still make it illegal to utilize green slope information in the book to aid in making a putting stroke though.  It would be a bit of a tell if the player and / or caddy are looking at the book while their ball is sitting on the green. 

John


  • Administrator
7 hours ago, ev780 said:

I know better than argue with the site owner

Sorry, gonna cut you off there briefly… this kind of statement makes no sense. I love to argue, discuss, and debate… and nobody who argues without resorting to name-calling or other incredibly obnoxious behavior is not punished in the slightest. Never has been.

I actually respect the people who can argue and make good points more than those who just blindly accept things. A lot of my friendships were borne out of debates and disagreements.

7 hours ago, ev780 said:

but it sure seems that people only have an issue if someone else writes it down. If a caddy went out after play or during practice round and wrote notes then that would be ok?

I don't know what "people" you're talking about, since we're all speculating on how the USGA/R&A could possibly enforce this rule.

And the bit you quoted by me had nothing to do with this: it was simply specifying that slope and distance are two different things. The former is disallowed even in range finders, the latter is allowed by almost any means and is public knowledge.

7 hours ago, ev780 said:

Again I can't really see the difference between a green book, a yardage map, a pin sheet, or even labeled sprinkler heads. These things are constants and do not vary substantially day to day thus public information.

No, distance and the location of hazards, etc. are considered public information. By rule. Slope is not. "How should I play this hole?" is not.

I understand what you're saying that it could be "public information," but that's not the Rules of Golf definition of "public information" like distances, the locations of hazards, etc. are.

6 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

The green books, based on what I see in the OP,  require the use of level surveying equipment with specific software to develop the topographic mapping, possibly combined with digital levels on the ground itself to record the specific slope (or they use the software to evaluate slope from the topo mapping at specific points).

The guy who mapped a green or two for AimPoint when they were on TV has a setup that maps every cm of a green to within a mm of precision in terms of height. He positions three to six lasers around the green and they scan the green into, again, a bajillion points: a 1cm grid accurate to within 1mm.

6 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

These REQUIRE the use of devices which would never be allowable during a round of golf.  I see this requirement to use sophisticated equipment as the reason that green books are looked upon differently from a typical yardage book.

Yes, they do require more than stepping things off.

We're also not allowed to read wind speed at the hole we're playing, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is similar to a kid showing up to take a math test with a calculator.   Back in my school days, the kid would have been send to the principals office for trying to cheat.   As time passed, not only was a calculator helpful, it was a requirement in some math classes.    

It use to be that reading greens was all about your sight and alignment.   Today with Aimpoint, we have improved the green reading using slope measurements.    The caddies can individually map the greens but the USGA hasn't caught up to the technology, just like the calculator.  It seems that somebody found a way to make money, $250/book according to the Golf Channel, and that may be one sticking point.   

I understand that the other information available to the players is public knowledge but eventually, I believe the slope readings will be.  

I'm initially thinking that this is no more cheating than any other useful tool that the player currently uses.  The bottom line: the player has to make the stroke.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
15 hours ago, Fourputt said:

It may come down to something as simple as what the information is and how it's obtained.  It's one thing to have a diagram of the green with some squiggly lines and arrows to show the general trends, something anyone can do just by spending a little time rolling balls.  It's quite another when the diagram shows the precise slope angles/percentages obtained with the laser based measuring techniques that surveyors use.

Distance measurement was always available by something as simple as pacing it off - anyone could do it.  Current EMD's simply make that process simpler, but they don't really tell you anything new - it's still something that anyone can do. 

Anyone can also make a green chart by walking the green and rolling a few balls.  That will give you some basic information which is really no different from what can be obtained simply by playing a few practice rounds.  It's when it moves into the realm of extreme technical assistance to provide precise detailed information which cannot be obtained through normal play or practice that the question comes into play. 

Just saying that the player still needs to hit the putt doesn't really address the underlying issue.  If he has this information which he could not have obtained through practice or play, and then scores better because he is better able to interpret the chart than the next guy rather than because he is the better putter, then you start to get into a foggy area of skill vs. technology.  

In my opinion, the game is far enough down that road already.

I think you summed it up nicely. If you do the work to make your own, that is fine. Having someone do the work for you, other than your caddy, is not fine.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, boogielicious said:

I think you summed it up nicely. If you do the work to make your own, that is fine. Having someone do the work for you, other than your caddy, is not fine.

Again, by this reasoning, commercially produced yardage books would be against the rules, even though they've been accepted for decades, and are specifically permitted by a decision.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Again, by this reasoning, commercially produced yardage books would be against the rules, even though they've been accepted for decades, and are specifically permitted by a decision.

Like I said, it's going to be a really hard and fine line to walk and enforce for the USGA and R&A.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

52 minutes ago, NCGolfer said:

Like I said, it's going to be a really hard and fine line to walk and enforce for the USGA and R&A.

Drawing the line might be difficult, but I don't think enforcement is an issue, especially at the professional level.

Failure to comply would simply be abject cheating, and the penalty for getting caught would simply be too great to ever consider or chance.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
3 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

Again, by this reasoning, commercially produced yardage books would be against the rules, even though they've been accepted for decades, and are specifically permitted by a decision.

I understand that. I'm not sure I like the idea of commercially produced yardage books. I've never seen one available for my courses.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,272 5/6* ⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩 ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,272 4/6* ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛⬛⬛🟦🟦 ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,272 4/6* ⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟨 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Just missed birdie for a stress free par…
    • I'm not an "official" instructor but I've been helping people for a few years now. I find that most beginners never get taught a proper concept of how the swing works. I also find that most people need a better understanding of what the arms and hands do before even working on the grip or the rest of the body. This is because what your concept of how the arms work through the downswing will dictate how strong or weak your grip must be. And if your arms work correctly then you can get away with a lot of variation in the lower body and still hit the ball decently. This will be long by the way... now...I get technical because...well...if you're writing it, you have to make it understandable. So let's understand the swing structure of the left or lead arm. The clubhead is controlled by the left hand, the left hand is controlled by the left wrist which is made up of the two bones of the forearm; the ulna closest to the pinky finger and the radius closest to the thumb. The forearm is attached to but can work independently of the humorous or upper arm which ends at the shoulder joint. That's the structure you are working with. Now how each section of that structure can work in different ways so let's talk about them starting at the upper arm. You may have heard people use the term "external shoulder rotation." It's usually used in reference to the right arm but that's okay you need to understand it in the left arm as well. First off...that's not a correct term. The shoulder is a complex structure of three bones; the clavicle in the upper chest/neck area, the scapula or shoulder blade that glides across the back and the end of the humorous bone that is the upper arm. So when you hear that term what they really are saying is "external rotation of the humerus." A simple way to understand this is to think about arm wrestling. If you are arm wresting someone with your elbow on a table you are trying to force your opponents arm into external rotation while your upper arm would be internally rotating. If you are losing the wrestling match you will find that while your elbow stays in place, your forearm and hand will be pushed back behind the elbow as your humerus externally rotates. So in the golf swing we don't want to be the winner of the arm wrestling match... at any point in time! Both upper arms need to externally rotate. The right upper arm externally rotates in the backswing and stays in that position through impact or for some people just before but very close to impact. The left arm must externally rotate in the downswing from impact through the finish. Some people choose to set-up with both upper arms externally rotated...think elbows pointed at the hips or biceps up. Others will start with just the right arm in this position...some people describe it as the "giving blood" position. Others start with both elbows internally rotated...biceps facing inward toward each other. You can set-up whichever way feels best to you but in your backswing and downswing the upper arms MUST externally rotate. Now back to the left arm...with which you should try to control the swing...and the forearm. The forearm is where most people get in trouble because it can rotate left or right no matter which orientation your upper arm is in...try it...it's just how the forearm is structured to work. And this is where you MUST make the decision as to how you want the forearms to work in order to choose how strong or weak your grip must be. Ben Hogan in his book 5 Lessons uses the terms supination and pronation. To illustrate it simply grab a club in your left hand and hold it out in front of you. Rotate your forearm to where your knuckles point to the sky (this is pronation) and then rotate your forearm the other way so that your knuckles point to the ground (this is supination). When your lead forearm is in pronation (knuckles up) the ulna will be on the left side of the radius. In supination (knuckles down the ulna rotates under the radius and the radius is now on the left side of the ulna. Very important that you relate this to the position of the ulna. At the top of the backswing you should be in a position where you feel that the knuckles of the left hand are pointed to the sky. As you rotate your body open and your chest pulls your arms down and into impact you will need to be aware that your ulna stays on the left side of the radius as long as possible. This is the position instructors are trying to have you achieve by pulling the butt of the club into an invisible wall past your left leg while maintaining the 90 degree angle formed by the shaft and your forearm. You've probably seen or heard of that drill as we all have over the years. Now here is the IMPORTANT part that no one seems to ever speak of...what happens from there!?! From that position...ulna on the left side of the radius, shaft and the forearm at a 90 degree angle, hands directly over the ball...you have two choices. 1) You can keep the ulna traveling toward the target on the left side of the radius and only release (unhinge) the wrists to lower the clubhead down into the ball or 2) while you unhinge your left wrist you can rotate your left forearm from the pronated position (knuckles up) to the supinated position (knuckles down) and let the ulna rotate under and eventually to the right side of the radius. If you choose to release the club with method 1 you will need a strong grip. The clubface will stay stable and square to the target throughout the swing but you probably will lose distance and have a very spinny ball flight. If you choose to release the club with method 2 you will probably require a much weaker grip as the clubhead will be less stable as it closes down coming into impact. This method requires more timing but results in more power through impact and usually more distance. You may also hook the ball if you start with too strong of a grip or a closed clubface at address. Method 2 is what most pros use but not all. Method 1 is what causes most people to hit weak, spinny slices and requires an unusually strong grip because with method 1 the left forearm has a tendency to open more coming into impact where the ulna stays in front of the radius too long.    Here's the catch...you need to learn both releases. Release 1 is how you want to use your wedges when you want to make sure the bounce interacts with the turf or if you need to hit a cut from left to right around a tree. You'll get more height and more spin with release 1. Release 2 will let the leading edge tear through the turf taking a nice crisp divot and can be used to hook a ball from right to left. Congratulations to anyone that read through all of this! I believe that once your brain understands precisely how it needs to control the different parts of your body it can do it repetitively on command. Your swing will repeat and not fall apart from day to day. Learn how you want to use your forearms and you can choose your grip and clubface position at address. Either method will work and both methods are used by the best players in the world for different shots.
    • Day 330 - Mostly just partial swings today, so I could really focus on exaggerating my hips towards the target in my finish. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...