Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nevets88

McIlroy signs with TaylorMade

Note: This thread is 855 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

28 posts / 3625 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Well, the tweet's right below, all clubs, ball and bag. I don't know if he's been testing TM recently, so maybe it's already common knowledge that he was going to switch, I just remember the last time seeing him play it was w/Callaways?

Update - here's a lot more info: 

http://www.pgatour.com/equipmentreport/2017/05/09/rory-mcilroy-taylormade-equipment-players-championship.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

300 million over 10 years, I think I read?  Not a bad deal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

54 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

 I just remember the last time seeing him play it was w/Callaways?

You're not crazy.  He was playing with he Epic sub zero driver and I also remember him toying around with the Apex irons as well.  I guess he's finally settled on a brand.

This doesn't affect his 10 year deal with Nike for apparel though.

2 minutes ago, TN94z said:

300 million over 10 years, I think I read?  Not a bad deal

Looks like it's $100M over next 10 years.  It's $300M if you add in the Nike deal.

That's some serious coin.  :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, NCGolfer said:

Looks like it's $100M over next 10 years.  It's $300M if you add in the Nike deal.

That's some serious coin.  :-)

That makes sense. I read it quickly on my phone at lunch. For sure some serious coin!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd better look to see if I picked him for my fantasy team, don't like to have guys who are switching gear - even if he is one of the top players in the world

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Wally Fairway said:

I'd better look to see if I picked him for my fantasy team, don't like to have guys who are switching gear - even if he is one of the top players in the world

Yep...granted the last time he switched to the worst club maker in the game (IMO) but in 2013 he went T25, T41, CUT in the three majors following his change.

With the amount of talent he has he should have been able to tin cup-it with a shovel and a baseball bat and done better than that.

Edited by skydog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NCGolfer said:

You're not crazy.  He was playing with he Epic sub zero driver and I also remember him toying around with the Apex irons as well.  I guess he's finally settled on a brand.

This doesn't affect his 10 year deal with Nike for apparel though.

Looks like it's $100M over next 10 years.  It's $300M if you add in the Nike deal.

That's some serious coin.  :-)

Hell, they could've had me for half that! :-D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It couldn't be TM article without a distance gain - 'Rory picks up 10 yards on his 6 iron by moving to TM'.  

Hope they didn't just give him a 5 iron with the gap on the 5 scratched closed to make it look like a 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Wally Fairway said:

I'd better look to see if I picked him for my fantasy team, don't like to have guys who are switching gear - even if he is one of the top players in the world

Good point. When you consider how much he struggled with the new equipment in 2013, logic dictates he won't win this week. He also just got married. He played by far the best golf of his career after he broke it off with Carolina Wozniacki. Combine these things together, and he in theory should play poorly this week haha.

On the counter-intuitive side of things however, marriage can really settle a person down and get them in a good place, so he could end up playing really well too. I know he'll probably be lower owned on Draftkings because of the equipment change, so that reason alone is grounds for using him.

I'll probably be avoiding him though. Bombers are neutralized at TPC Sawgrass because it's much more about placing it to a certain area of the fairway than just gripping it and ripping it. The fairways are too narrow at 300+ to have driver in your hands as much as a player like Rory would want to.

Fun to think about though for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nice to see a company who is financially struggling and for sale have all this money to pay out to Rory, Tiger, etc.   

Not a hater of any brand, but these guys are at a level where I highly doubt putting an Epic Driver or an M2 in Rory's hand is going to greatly change his performance.  Unless TM invents a miracle putter I doubt Rory is going to start winning a bunch more majors and tournaments all of the sudden.  TM was willing to pay him the most cash.  Pure and simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://golf.swingbyswing.com/article/rory-mcilroy-signs-taylormade-equipment-mega-deal/?e=DF8B2FF0AB077F624B57949CE05A99C9

 

He talked more about the Taylormade TP5 balls more than the Clubs. He says he even has a 1 iron in the bag for the TPC.  Custom made irons made for him.  Well see if this helps. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, JetFan1983 said:

Good point. When you consider how much he struggled with the new equipment in 2013, logic dictates he won't win this week. He also just got married. He played by far the best golf of his career after he broke it off with Carolina Wozniacki. Combine these things together, and he in theory should play poorly this week haha.

On the counter-intuitive side of things however, marriage can really settle a person down and get them in a good place, so he could end up playing really well too. I know he'll probably be lower owned on Draftkings because of the equipment change, so that reason alone is grounds for using him.

I'll probably be avoiding him though. Bombers are neutralized at TPC Sawgrass because it's much more about placing it to a certain area of the fairway than just gripping it and ripping it. The fairways are too narrow at 300+ to have driver in your hands as much as a player like Rory would want to.

Fun to think about though for sure.

Yeah, he seemed to play better when he was single and had lots of time to practice -- I remember an interview around that time after he won a tournament that he'd been practicing all the time since he didn't have anything else to do.

Newly married + $300 million over the next 10 years = less practicing

Less practicing + new clubs = less winning :-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.espn.com/golf/story/_/id/19351857/adidas-sells-golf-businesses-taylormade-adams-golf-ashworth-425-million

This sale price and the drop in the brand's revenue might be the most damning piece of evidence I've seen in support of the 'golf is dying' narrative. $1.7B in revenue in 2012 down to <$500M in 2016?? How the heck does that happen?? And how is a brand that is bringing in that (relatively) little amount of money, think it's a good idea to pay a wildly inconsistent golfer this much money over the next 10 years?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, skydog said:

http://www.espn.com/golf/story/_/id/19351857/adidas-sells-golf-businesses-taylormade-adams-golf-ashworth-425-million

This sale price and the drop in the brand's revenue might be the most damning piece of evidence I've seen in support of the 'golf is dying' narrative. $1.7B in revenue in 2012 down to <$500M in 2016?? How the heck does that happen?? And how is a brand that is bringing in that (relatively) little amount of money, think it's a good idea to pay a wildly inconsistent golfer this much money over the next 10 years?

I believe that it's called a "hail mary"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Roughly 24 hours after TaylorMade Golf unveiled Rory McIlroy as its newest staffer, parent company Adidas announced it had reached a definitive agreement to sell TaylorMade, Adams Golf and Ashworth to KPS Capital Partners, LP for a total consideration of $425 million.

For full story, see... Adidas sells Taylormade

CBS Sports video: Rory signs with TM

Golf Channel interview on TaylorMade sale: Golf Central Blog: Matt Adams

Edited by WUTiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, skydog said:

This sale price and the drop in the brand's (TM) revenue might be the most damning piece of evidence I've seen in support of the 'golf is dying' narrative. $1.7B in revenue in 2012 down to <$500M in 2016?? How the heck does that happen??

Two converging trends got TM in trouble.

  1. Arms race with Callaway. About 2012, TM and Callaway got into a contest for churning out new equipment. This really busted the golf-OEM tradition of a two-year life cycle for most club models. It proved to be a drain on the net profits of both, and upset everyday golfers (see below).
  2. 2014 singes Adidas (and TM). Adidas and its TM division both had bad years. Adidas made a major push on World Cup soccer (er, futbol :8)) and fell well short of sales projections. Likewise, TM had a major push on even newer 2014 club models on the heels of summer 2013 new models. But TM had production and shipping problems and missed supplying a lot of the early spring golf sales. This, plus golfer resentment over the fact that the summer driver had dropped in value by 50%, caused a financial and PR hit on the TM division.

(Product reps say Callaway has since gone to more of a pull product release plan. It waits until a model pretty well sells out before releasing a subsequent replacement model.) 

Edited by WUTiger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 855 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • I had two friends that played Founders Clubs.  I have never heard of them being a club made by Langert. How ever a search did bring up some info on those clubs. Is this the item you are referring to? eBay has a listing for this driver. My friends played this driver.  
    • I watch GSK just because I like watching him play.  But he is a scratch player so he can get away with hitting three 6 irons on a 540 yd par five.  Me, I have to get max distance on every shot because I know that I will probably mis-hit 1/3 shots.  So his divide and conquer strategy wont work for me.  Fun videos tho. 
    • Another idea is to make your own shaft flex board. Maltby sell one for $180. I once made one for free using a scrap of plywood, and some 2", 1/4" dowell material. Hung it on my garage wall.  I marked known  clubs flexes on the board as reference points, using a consistent weight. The board also gave me other info besides flex.  It was crude looking, but did the job.  It mattered little what the manufacturer's rating on the shaft was, which was usually different from each company. What ever my flex board showed me, was what the actual flex was when compared to the known flexes I used.   Maltby probably has a picture of his flex board on his website. Probably other sites have picts available too. With a little self ingenuity, a person can study the picture, and build their own. It's pretty easy. 
    • I thought about this a while, and then had an epiphany last night.  Without a perfect test, the answer is almost definitely no. It's a fairly simple statistical calculation called Bayes' Theorem. The end result is that you'll end up preventing more people from driving when they aren't drunk than preventing drunk drivers. I'm going to plug in numbers, but since I'm (likely correctly!) assuming drunk driving is a rare event, the numbers don't really matter that much. I'm also going to assume the test is extremely accurate. Let's say that in 1/10,000 car trips, the driver is too drunk to legally drive. This is probably an underestimation by a factor of 100, if not more, if you think about how many car trips there are in a day. Let's assume that the when the test is positive, the driver is drunk 99.9% of the time. And then assume that when the test is negative, the driver is sober 99.9% of the time (in other words, if the test is negative, the driver is drunk 0.1% of the time). We can use this to plug in probabilities for each event. Probability that a driver is drunk: .0001 Probability that a driver is sober: .9999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a positive test: .999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a negative test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a positive test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a negative test: .999 Bayes' Theorem applies here. It says: The probability that someone is drunk driver given a positive test is equal to the probability of a drunk driver gets a positive test times the probability of a drunk driver; that divided by the following: the probability of a drunk getting a positive test times probability of a drunk driver plus the probability of sober driver getting a positive test times the probability of a sober driver. In mathematic terms (DD=drunk driver; SD = sober driver; + = positive test): P(DD | +) = (P(+ | DD)*P(DD))/((P+ | DD)*P(DD)+P(+ | SD)*P(SD)) Plug in the numbers: P(DD | +) = ((.999)*(.0001))/((.999)*(.0001)+(.001)*(.9999)) P(DD | +) = .0908 In other words, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 9%. Meaning that out of a 100 people that test positive under this test, 91 of them would actually be sober. Because the test is imperfect and drunk driving is rare, it's going to impact more sober drivers than drunk drivers. Even if the test is 99.99% accurate and as a false positive rate of 0.01%, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 50%. Note that I'm assuming that 1/10,000 car trips is one by a drunk driver. If you assume 1/100,000 car trips are by a drunk driver, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is 0.9%. (You can also use this calculate to find out the odds that a drunk driver will have a negative test, but I have other stuff to do now...) So, without a nearly perfect test, it's a bad idea for the entire population. If drunk drivers were more frequent, then it would make more sense. Hence, it makes sense for someone who is more likely to drive drunk, and why the current policy probably makes sense. 
    • Hey Ben, good to see you’re still around!   I remember those irons. They’re beautiful! Sorry, I can’t help with the driver though…
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...