Jump to content
IGNORED

Anyone Wear UV/Sun Sleeves?


Shindig
Note: This thread is 1114 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I had an appointment this morning with a dermatologist (just part of a regular checkup, considering how much time I spend outside).  She suggested that I get and wear UV sleeves.  I probably will take her suggestion.  Does anyone else wear these?  Are they like wearing detachable long sleeves for your shirt or are they something else?  Any associated recommendations? 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Did she say anything about spray on sunblock? Is that not enough?

The only reason I considered the sleeves vs. sunblock is I don't like smelling like a tanning bed afterwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I use them.  I have a condition (chronic graft vs. host disease "GVHD") that requires me to avoid contact with the sun.  They are detached but not like long sleeves.  More like tights for your arms.  There are also some that are "cooling".  I use to wear them all the time.  I still wear them because I have a handful of short sleeve polos that I still want to use.  I prefer to wear long sleeve shirts as I find them more comfortable than the tight sleeves.  I like the long sleeve Polos that are thin dri fit for warm/hot days. This one is a good deal and has lasted me quite a while with no signs of wear.  I have a couple of mediums and a small.  The small fits me better, we are about the same size if I recall correctly (5'11", 155 lbs.).

https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CIZHY6S/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

All covered up with sleeves:

20160810_131104.png

Tree shot.jpg

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks to everyone for the feedback.  I had no idea where I'd be starting when I heard the advice.  Still have to read about the choices.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't have problems with the sun but IMHO, you would be way better off with sun blocking clothes than slathering sun screen all over. Who knows what all the chemicals in that stuff could cause down the road.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, dennyjones said:

Check this site out.   We have bought some sun shirts and they are pretty good

Solumbra

I checked that out and led me down a path of looking into the Sun-Protective clothing. Here is one article I read: http://www.skincancer.org/publications/the-melanoma-letter/summer-2012-vol-30-no-2/clothing

I use to think those ratings were a marketing gimick.  I believed that if I'm covering up with long pants, long sleeve shirts, big brimed hats and my skin is staying lily white then I'm getting protection.  Maybe that's just not enough...

Those shirts I mentioned in a previous post don't publish a rating as such I won't be getting them in the future.  I'm going to start paying attention to the sun protection ratings on clothing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

I use to think those ratings were a marketing gimick.  I believed that if I'm covering up with long pants, long sleeve shirts, big brimed hats and my skin is staying lily white then I'm getting protection.  Maybe that's just not enough...

I have read somewhere that regular clothing is only about spf 4.  I have a Solumbra swim shirt that is amazing.  I don't have one of their golf shirts but I will by next year.

Edited by dennyjones

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't know what they were until a few weeks ago when I was watching the women's US Open and many of the players were wearing long pants and UV sleeves. I assumed that's what the sleeves were, now I know. I just wear a floppy hat with a brim all the way around and use sunblock on my face, neck, ears, arms and legs. Covering up is undoubtedly safer, but it would be awfully hot and constricting, maybe some day.

Edited by Midpack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

I have read somewhere that regular clothing is only about spf 4. 

Maybe I dont understand this correctly, but youre saying that me wearing just a tee shirt outside all day is worse than me wearing 15 or 30 SPF sunscreen all day? That doesnt add up. If regular clothing is only SPF 4, wouldnt pretty much everyone get burned when they are just outside in a single layer of regular clothing?

Driver: :callaway: Rogue Max ST LS
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood/3Hybrid
Irons: :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   MD5 54 58 degree  
Putter: :odyssey:  White Hot RX #1
Ball: :srixon: Z Star XV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Midpack said:

I didn't know what they were until a few weeks ago when I was watching the women's US Open and many of the players were wearing long pants and UV sleeves. I assumed that's what the sleeves were, now I know. I just wear a floppy hat with a brim all the way around and use sunblock on my face, neck, ears, arms and legs. Covering up is undoubtedly safer, but it would be awfully hot and constricting, maybe some day.

A guy i play with alot told me that many of the South Korean players often wear long pants and sleeves is because there is a stigma agaist being tanned in their culture. If you're tanned, It means that your  an "outside" person or something that has to do manual labor. Which i guess they look down on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, klineka said:

Maybe I dont understand this correctly, but youre saying that me wearing just a tee shirt outside all day is worse than me wearing 15 or 30 SPF sunscreen all day? That doesnt add up. If regular clothing is only SPF 4, wouldnt pretty much everyone get burned when they are just outside in a single layer of regular clothing?

You may be mixing UPF (clothing) with SPF (sunblocks/creams), I don't think they're interchangeable. Google for much more info. And even everyday fabrics can range in UPF from 3 to 115 or more.

Edited by Midpack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Midpack said:

You may be mixing UPF (clothing) with SPF (sunblocks/creams), I don't think they're interchangeable. Google for much more info. And even everyday fabrics can range in UPF from 3 to 115 or more.

My bad, it is UPF, not SPF.   Most summer clothes are not as good as a SPF 30 sunscreen if applied every 2 hours.

 

This is a good read:

SPF of a t-shirt

Edited by dennyjones

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 7/27/2017 at 5:13 AM, Valleygolfer said:

I don't have problems with the sun but IMHO, you would be way better off with sun blocking clothes than slathering sun screen all over. Who knows what all the chemicals in that stuff could cause down the road.

Yeah... not sure I'm super worried about chemicals in general, but the Lewis Black routine does ring in my head (not saying that's where your concern comes from, of course).  But the clothing achieving the same effect would undoubtedly be at least as safe.

On 7/27/2017 at 5:26 AM, caniac6 said:

We were in Pinehurst in May, and the majority of the caddies were wearing the sleeves and wide brim hats.

I do wear the full brim hat, but maybe I could find one wider.  I think the hats I wear qualify more as fishing hats than golf hats.  

Thanks again to everyone who is contributing.  There wasn't even a scare for me at the dermatologist, but it's something I'm now worried about.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I went to a dermatologist this year just to be safe and they took a pre-cancerous biopsy from my right shoulder.   The cost wasn't too expensive but it gave me peace of mind to know that at least currently, I'm good to go.  

  • Upvote 2

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 7/27/2017 at 5:13 AM, Valleygolfer said:

I don't have problems with the sun ...

It won't be a problem until it is.  My dermatologist told me most of the damage is done when people were young.   It can take decades before cancer shows up.

Edited by No Mulligans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1114 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • @boogielicious and I are definitely in for the Stay & Play and will need the extra night's stay on Friday. I don't know what the plans are for our group on Friday but even if we don't make it for dinner with the rest of the Friday arrivals, I'll be more than happy to meet up somewhere for a beer or something.
    • Taking your dispersion and distance in consideration I analyzed the 4 posible ways to play the hole, or at least the ones that were listed here. I took the brown grass on the left as fescue were you need to punch out sideways to the fairway and rigth of the car path to be fescue too.  Driver "going for the green"  You have to aim more rigth, to the bunker in order to center your shotzone in between the fescue.  Wood of 240 over the bunkers I already like this one more for you. More room to land between the fescue. Balls in the fescue 11% down from 30% with driver. Improve of score from 4.55 to 4.40. 4 iron 210 yards besides the bunkers.    Also a wide area and your shot zone is better than previous ones. This makes almost the fescue dissapear. You really need to hit a bad one (sometimes shit happens). Because of that and only having 120 yards in this is the best choice so far. Down to 4.32 from 4.40. Finally the 6 Iron 180 yards to avoid all trouble.    Wide area an narrow dispersion for almost been in the fairway all the time. Similar than the previous one but 25 yards farther for the hole to avoid been in the bunkers. Average remains the same, 4.33 to 4.32.  Conclusion is easy. Either your 4iron or 6 iron of the tee are equaly good for you. Glad that you made par!
    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...