Jump to content
IGNORED

The Golf Ball "Problem": PGA Tour Players Hitting it Far is a Problem for All of Golf?


iacas
Note: This thread is 1219 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

The Golf Ball "Problem"  

174 members have voted

  1. 1. Does the distance modern PGA Tour pros hit the ball pose a problem to golf as a whole?

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      134
  2. 2. What is the main source of the "problem" above?

    • The golf ball goes too far, primarily.
      23
    • Several factors all contribute heavily.
      26
    • I voted "No" above, and I don't think there's really a "problem" right now.
      125


Recommended Posts

On 10/17/2017 at 5:10 PM, Jack Watson said:

Find a mod PGA guy who says the olden times players were not as good as they are now.  Present evidence...

https://www.golfdigest.com/story/how-would-modern-tour-pros-do-hitting-ben-hogans-old-clubs-we-had-them-try-and-it-wasnt-pretty

I challenge anyone to present evidence that modern tour players think that they are better than their predecessors...

This is a simple fact.  The old times players had to strike with greater precision.

Nice post, I enjoyed watching the video.

However, I'm 100% sure the modern players hit with just as much precision anyway. Also, I doubt many or if any modern tour players make any kind of comparison stating that they're better with tour players of the past. They're from different eras, hard to compare.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

55 minutes ago, Lihu said:

However, I'm 100% sure the modern players hit with just as much precision anyway.

Of course they do. And this is what @Jack Watson is missing. Yes the equipment is better. But so are the athletes. What Jack is forgetting is that it's not like all the modern tour players are now hitting the ball a mile. Tiger came out and first shook the game up with his distance.  All the pros were playing modern equipment, it was Tiger who stood out. That's skill and precision @Jack Watson, not just equipment. I remember a skins game (remember those) when Tiger was playing and Jack Nicklaus was there, Mark O'meara as well. Jack says, "Criminey Tiger just hit a 7i on that shot" (Don't remember the yardage but it was very impressive) then Mark O says, "Well he's supposed to hit it like that, he's 22". Jack Nicklaus then says, "Well, you never hit it like that when you were 22." Mic drop. 

To think the older players were 'more precise' or required more skill is asinine. They were great golfers doing the best with the equipment available at that time. Just like today the golfers are doing their best with the equipment of today. But it's not just the equipment. As @iacas has mentioned the athletes themselves are better. This has occurred in every sport. The 100m record keeps getting faster, the high jump higher, the long jump longer. Again I think this all boils down to a guy with good intentions who has been beaten to the ground by golf and just isn't able to relax and truly admit, golf is hard. Maybe too hard for him. Cheers Jack.

Edited by Vinsk

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, joro said:

It is a never ending discussion isn't it.

Damn it I'm off topic. Sorry.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

o think the older players were 'more precise' or required more skill is asinine.

Ask the mod pros about hitting persimmon.  I've posted examples.  They ALL say wow much more difficult,  so you are not arguing against me,  but them.  Again you lack any real point.  As far as your multiple thinly veiled ad hominem attacks against me,  I can only respond that I do not believe as you do that one must be a masochist to be a golfer.  Golf is what you make it.

@saevel25

Good points,  and in baseball the ball has prolly been juiced,  but it's nothing endorsed or admitted by MLB.  It's probably true but anyways in golf the governing bodies were bullied by the equipment manufacturers imo.  In the NBA they moved the line in for a couple years then returned it back where it was.

IMO in golf the equipment manufacturers caused a revolution,  and the governing bodies failed to protect the integrity of the game...Obviously that's just an opinion...

Edited by Jack Watson
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
11 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Ask the mod pros about hitting persimmon.  I've posted examples.  They ALL say wow much more difficult,  so you are not arguing against me,  but them.  Again you lack any real point.  As far as your multiple thinly veiled ad hominem attacks against me,  I can only respond that I do not believe as you do that one must be a masochist to be a golfer.  Golf is what you make it.

Difficulty of old equipment is not an argument that proves - at all - old players were more precise.

Logic fail @Jack Watson.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, iacas said:

Difficulty of old equipment is not an argument that proves - at all - old players were more precise.

Logic fail @Jack Watson.

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


39 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Pretzel said:

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

The problem is, he will never admit that the current golfers are superior than their predecessors. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Jack Watson said:

So the assumption is old clubs ball were more difficult to hit.  I am assuming you mean you disagree on that,  and if so we have no quarrel.  Based on that assumption though it's no logic fail.

No.

What @Pretzel said.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

30 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

Just because it was more difficult doesn't mean they were more precise. Remember, the new pros play better than the old ever did, so the difficulty difference is offset by the scores that are being shot nowadays.

-Ben Hogan won the Vardon Trophy in 1948 with an average score of 69.3.  In 2008 Sergio Garcia won the Vardon Trophy with a score of 69.12.

hmmmm

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
7 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

-Ben Hogan won the Vardon Trophy in 1948 with an average score of 69.3.  In 2008 Sergio Garcia won the Vardon Trophy with a score of 69.12.

hmmmm

Still failing.

Sergio played far more difficult courses.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You pick one person. It's easy to nit pick data for your own advantage. Would Hogan succeed in the modern era, probably. Would he be as dominant, most likely not. He didn't compete against the quality of players the best players have to compete against today. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@saevel25

true,  stats can be used to prove almost any point.  @iacas has a poin also, but so do I because the EQUIPMENT differed so greatly.  I am not a stats guy and would probably be made to look stupid by folks here who know stats better...It's just imo with crap agronomy and gear relatively that Hogan was able to do that.  Who knows what he would have done if he was not almost killed by a greyhound bus.  I have not publicly posted hope for Woods because I believe he won't be back, but like anyone who loves golf in the back of my mind I have a wish to see him at least contend again at a major.

In Shells golf match vs Snead Hogan hit every green and many accounts say even after the accident this was commonplace for him. Nicklaus once said when asked is Tiger the best striker you have ever seen and Jack replied no Ben Hogan easily.  The argument that today's players are more skilled golfers than the greats of yesteryear is not cut and dried.

Many knowledgeable people in golf agree that the older fellas were a bit better at ballstriking.  As far as the athletics argument for mod guys goes,  it's not necessary to be an Olympic class athlete to play world class golf

A  it's a game of skill and

B  the golf swing is not the most efficient motion in terms of body input equaling clubhead speed output.  You can have plenty of d without being a Federer or Curry class of athlete conditioning wise and we have seen it over the years.  Finally

you have many players on the champions tour whose driving average is farther now than it was during their prime on tour!  Explain that without taking into account equipment!  Everyone knows it's equipment!  

As always best wishes to all

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Jack Watson said:

Many knowledgeable people in golf agree that the older fellas were a bit better at ballstriking.

Many have said the opposite.

You’re well off topic now, and have been for far too long. So you’re done now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...

https://www.yahoo.com/newsroom/vibes/celebrity/v-b7ddaf4b-9395-34b6-9ddc-e32547089110_c-344b1553-7357-3e40-9c2e-64a72319083b_a-344b1553-7357-3e40-9c2e-64a72319083b?soc_src=newsroom&soc_trk=com.apple.UIKit.activity.CopyToPasteboard&.tsrc=newsroom

Tiger can’t believe how far he’s hitting the ball? Maybe it’s that you are arguably the best golfer of all time? That you came out and hit the ball like no one had ever seen? Give me a break ...stop this nonsense with limiting the distance. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well Vinsk, we all have opinions on it, but if you read the article Tiger seems to be referring to what he is getting into and that is course design.    He said the longall is taking more property to make courses longer.    It also takes more maintenance, water, and other things.    I don't think he has other problems except that maybe he doesn't like to think about people knocking it way past him when he was the man a few years ago.    Do we really know what he means?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites


16 minutes ago, joro said:

Well Vinsk, we all have opinions on it, but if you read the article Tiger seems to be referring to what he is getting into and that is course design.    He said the longall is taking more property to make courses longer.    It also takes more maintenance, water, and other things.    I don't think he has other problems except that maybe he doesn't like to think about people knocking it way past him when he was the man a few years ago.    Do we really know what he means?    

Yeah I get that. But golf will find a way. It’s not like the tour players are out there shooting in the 50’s every round. There are still bogeys + a-plenty out there. And there are still shorter hitters winning tournaments (Brian Harmon for one). I don’t know much about golf course architecture but I don’t think there is a shortage of courses right now. And I also believe there are other ways to make a course difficult like Oakmont other than lengthening it.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1219 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I would recommend spending some time at the range and film your swing. You can post it in the Member Swings thread. At the range, you can figure out how to control the driver a bit more. We can offer some pointers once you post in the Member Swings section.
    • With the H4 or the watch, you tag the club before hitting by putting the tag next to the device. The tag is on the club butt end. After a round, you don’t really think about it too much. You just do it. I don’t know how far you are from @phillyk, but he may know an instructor in your area.
    • So the biggest issue right now is marrying the hands down with an athletic turn. I can get stuck not turning. Things get interesting from there. 
    • Wordle 1,040 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Hi everybody!  I am new to the golf game. I have taken some lessons and got fitted for clubs a couple of months ago. I usually score between 110-120 for 18 holes.  I bought a Stealth driver last year and have been hitting consistently with it 210-230 yds on the simulator. But when I take it out on the course, every drive is a severe slice!  I played 18 holes yesterday at the club where I belong. I removed the driver from my bag and used the 5 iron to drive with. I hit straight 16 out of 18 drives, 180 - 200 yds. I used the 5i - putter for the rest of my game.  I ended the day with a 92. Question: Does it make sense for me to continue playing with irons only until I get further along in my game before I reintroduce the Driver and woods again? Or should I continue to struggle with the Driver and woods and shoot in the 100’s again? To me it’s a no brainer, but for those more advanced I am interested to get feedback.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...