Jump to content
Lihu

Michael Jordan on GOAT in golf

Recommended Posts

Found this link looking at Tiger and his new swing.

Michael Jordan makes some very good points about why the term "GOAT" doesn't make sense.

Quote

“You’re never going to say who’s the greatest of all time. To me, I think that’s more for PR and more for selling stories and getting hype. Jack and Tiger never played against each other. They never played in the same tournament. They never played with the same equipment. They never played with the same length of golf course. I never played against Wilt Chamberlain. I never played against Jerry West. To now say that one is greater than the other is being a little bit unfair.”

“Obviously, Jack won more during the time he played; Tiger evolved it to where it crossed a lot of its boundaries, where it’s not just a white guys’ sport; black guys, African-Americans, you know, all these play the game. And he played it at a level where he generated so much interest financially that it grew the game from a financial standpoint.”

“Now, does that constitute him being the greatest? Does that mean he’s any less than Jack? I think it’s unfair. Yes, Jack has 18 majors and Tiger’s got 14, and that’s how people are judging certain things. I won six championships; Bill Russell won 11. Does that make Bill Russell better than me, or make me better than him? No, because we played in different eras.”

Well said, MJ. Maybe cut back on the stogies, though?

Smart guy.

Edited by Lihu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

To be pedantic, they played in the same tournament plenty times, and Tiger smoked Jack. Tiger was also like 30 years younger at the time, but hey, I said "to be pedantic." ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, jamo said:

To be pedantic, they played in the same tournament plenty times, and Tiger smoked Jack. Tiger was also like 30 years younger at the time, but hey, I said "to be pedantic." ;-)

What tournaments did they play? It seems like a 35 year difference would put Jack in the Champions tour when Tiger turned 15? So, Tiger must have beat jack when he was 14?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Lihu said:

What tournaments did they play? It seems like a 35 year difference would put Jack in the Champions tour when Tiger turned 15? So, Tiger must have beat jack when he was 14?

Well, off the top of my head, iirc Jack's last British Open was 2005, soooo.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, colin007 said:

Well, off the top of my head, iirc Jack's last British Open was 2005, soooo.....

Right. Mostly majors, but Jack played a few events like Doral, Pebble, and Memorial through the early 2000s.

Also, MJ's comparison of him and Russell is very apt. Not sure how I never thought of that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Basketball is a bit different than golf. It is a team sport. I think it is easier to justify Tiger over Jack than it is to compare Michael versus Russell. Too many factors when trying to compare players on team sports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Basketball is a bit different than golf. It is a team sport. I think it is easier to justify Tiger over Jack than it is to compare Michael versus Russell. Too many factors when trying to compare players on team sports.

True, but it seems like Jack was not at his peak at the time they competed. 35 years is a huge difference.

That's likely what MJ was thinking when he said they never competed. I'd still give MJ a lot more kudos for understanding sports than most people.

To watch Jack's game when he competed with Tiger isn't really fair. They peaked in different eras.

The average Web tour player is driving over 300 yards. In Jack's time it was less than a dozen. In Tiger's time it was just as low until the younger players came along. At this point even 15 years is a huge difference such as between Rory and Tiger.

Age is a big factor in how fast someone can swing, and, in turn, score.

Edited by Lihu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • @Yff Theos Cp cf hit v swing  etc... None of these antiquated and mistaken false dichotomies have much relevance.   Saying a thing like a cp swing has low rate of closure and cf has high really means little.  Also you mention that you know how effective teaching either would be based on player type?  Sounds fishy to me. Correlating roc to skill at ballstriking is highly questionable. Instagram and you tube are not teachers.  IMO if you really want to get somewhere it takes years of experience.  IMO you sound like a person that absolutely correlates kinematics and skill.  Modern research is beginning to find that this is not the case as previously thought. online we all love data and some folks get all into the techy discussions about details.   Ultimately though information is just that.  The player has to execute the shot and that doesn't happen by analyzing the number three accumulator and also it's not a deal where you simply choose how to swing based on the quality of information you know.  Everyone has strengths and weaknesses and there are variations in athletic tendencies.   Mac was a great athlete and totally obsessed with golf.  Maybe it's easy for you to think well I like his mechanics so I will swing like that and teach what he did. But...  
    • @Golfingdad, as you know, he said "2-3 rotations." And the pixel math was on an angle that would make it as short as possible. And when you're talking about 10.56" vs. at least 18", that's a significant margin. Even 15.8 vs. 18" is a non-negligible percentage. But since you brought it up (while I happened to be in front of the TV): 1472.08 ball to hole, 263.62 width of the hole.
      263.62 / 4.25 = 62.02823529 pixels/inch.
      1472.08 pixels / 62.02823529 px/in = 23.73241788 inches. Almost exactly two feet.
    • That's a shame... so much talent. I hope she makes the change.
    • I used a launch monitor today and recorded ten swings from 5 clubs. These were all full swings at about 80%-90% effort. Everything but the driver was without a tee. The employee suggested I discard the duffs, but I decided to keep them. They lowered my averages but I thought they were a good "snapshot" of how I hit. No real surprises on distances or side angles (other than the pull hooks with my 5w), but the numbers on the driver may have provided something to work towards.  I have to do a better job of controlling my low point. Currently, I seem to be bottoming out too close to the ball. I'll have to review "How to hit the driver further" thread. 7i   5w   5i   Driver   4i
    •   You guys are less than 2.2" apart with these estimations.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. hockeyref18
      hockeyref18
      (18 years old)
    2. Mike86
      Mike86
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.