Jump to content
Vinsk

Rules official resigns over ...rules issue.

25 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/major-rules-controversy-leads-officials-resignation/

So once again a Major (albeit a smaller tour) decided to be cut to 54 holes this time over a disagreement on rules enforcement controversy. Poor decision IMO. The players broke a rule but complained and threatened to withdraw if enforced? Take a look and see what you think. Total loss of credibility on behalf of tournament officials and poor sportsmanship by the players overall I feel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

 Those players that threatened to resign should have been allowed, nay, encouraged to do so.  I'm sure there would have been plenty of players who would have been pleased to continue with the resulting smaller field!

I'm curious to see the greens, but regardless of any potential ambiguity in differentiating the putting surface from the fringe, the rules must be applied.  When in doubt, either err on the side of safety and don't lift your ball, or ask a rules official for a ruling.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

54 minutes ago, David in FL said:

 Those players that threatened to resign should have been allowed, nay, encouraged to do so.  I'm sure there would have been plenty of players who would have been pleased to continue with the resulting smaller field!

I'm curious to see the greens, but regardless of any potential ambiguity in differentiating the putting surface from the fringe, the rules must be applied.  When in doubt, either err on the side of safety and don't lift your ball, or ask a rules official for a ruling.

 

 

Yes. Imagine if DJ had complained and threatened to withdraw after being told he grounded his club in the ambiguous bunker. LOL. Bye DJ. I know this is a 'side tour' but nonetheless I feel it's still responsible to uphold the rules of golf. I just can't believe the final decision was to erase the scores for that day! Lousy decision there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, dennyjones said:

Wow...I can't believe they came to that decision.  

Yeah, pretty chickencrap IMO! Admittedly, I've never seen the course, but I've played a lot of golf and never had a problem differentiating the fringe from the "closely mowed putting surface"! Penalize the violators and let the chips fall where they may.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Yeah, pretty chickencrap IMO! Admittedly, I've never seen the course, but I've played a lot of golf and never had a problem differentiating the fringe from the "closely mowed putting surface"! Penalize the violators and let the chips fall where they may.

Yes, it would not be the first time. Remember Dustin Johnson in the US Open? It was a bunker, no it was not a bunker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, CCC said:

Yes, it would not be the first time. Remember Dustin Johnson in the US Open? It was a bunker, no it was not a bunker.

Yes. Remember the post 3 above yours? Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I do. It bears repeating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, CCC said:

Yes, I do. It bears repeating.

What does?

Also, of course, it doesn't bear repeating if it's off topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oooops. My bad. Again. :)

No harm - No foul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Todays players, both male and female are a bunch of self centered spoiled brats who make too much money, ignore the rules, especially the time guidelines, ignore warnings and do what they want.    Look at Spieth, he takes more time than normal, doesn't care, ignores warnings, and is always on the clock.    Just one example but he is never penalized, why?    He is just one of many.   Now I see his friend Thomas is following suit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Wally Fairway said:

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

 

15 minutes ago, Wally Fairway said:

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

 

Good point Wally, the rules are hard to enforce when there is no obvious boundary.    The Dustin Johnson thing was the worst I have ever seen and the explanation that is was well defined and posted for all to see was nothing but a attempt to justify what the powers in hand did to DJ.    When they allow people to walk and stand in what they call a "Sand Trap" they are good candidates for Densa.    That was nothing but taking the Championship away from him.      This LPGA thing is no different and should have been handled differently by the both parties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, joro said:

Good point Wally, the rules are hard to enforce when there is no obvious boundary.    The Dustin Johnson thing was the worst I have ever seen and the explanation that is was well defined and posted for all to see was nothing but a attempt to justify what the powers in hand did to DJ.    When they allow people to walk and stand in what they call a "Sand Trap" they are good candidates for Densa.    That was nothing but taking the Championship away from him.      This LPGA thing is no different and should have been handled differently by the both parties.

Let’s not rehash the DJ thing. The players knew all sandy areas were bunkers. On a course with that many, some 100 yards from the center of the fairway, spectators were bound to be in them.

DJ isn’t the sharpest tack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

Let’s not rehash the DJ thing. The players knew all sandy areas were bunkers. On a course with that many, some 100 yards from the center of the fairway, spectators were bound to be in them.

DJ isn’t the sharpest tack.

Ha ha ha, that is a great reply, brilliant.    "spectators were bound to be in them"    lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would really like to see a picture of the greens and fringe at this course. Every article I've seen doesn't have a picture. I feel like normally it's pretty obvious. For 6 players to mess it up is very strange. 

And I wish the articles would explain why the rules official resigned. Was it because she screwed up or because she did not agree with how this tour handled it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I haven't seen images of the greens in question either, but I seem to recall that some time ago on the men's tour (perhaps it was in Europe?), the distinction between green and fringe was very difficult to make and they had blue dots of some kind, spaced out every so many feet, at the boundary...

Either way, I can't believe so many players would be so careless if they couldn't tell where the boundary was, and that the decision to drop the first round scores was taken as a result. SMH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah I’ve searched for pics as well. Does seem odd that six players made the same error. Must be a ‘section’ of the green where it was ambiguous and I guess those six players were all in that particular section. @iacas, had a rules official came and looked at the area and realized it wasn’t very clear where the green border was could he/she had declared this? I assume since penalties were given somebody knew where the border was? Obviously if a player wasn’t sure he/she should’ve asked but I’m wondering if it was so unclear that the players had no doubt they were on the green? Hopefully some pictures will surface.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • First you get the strike...then you get the speed !! Strike is boss...the first thing that you should ask yourself after every shot that you hit is how did I strike it.  If you struck it well...proceed to analyze the shot, and if you didn't strike it well, disregard the results and go back and fix the strike because the shot didn't end up where you wanted it to because poor strike should NEVER be apart of your plan.  In my opinion you aren't truly playing golf until a solid strike can be taken for granted and ignored.  Planning for a miss or taking one extra club is not the same thing either because the intention is to still strike it solidly.  Impact is boss.
    • And that is why I will never try to copy a Pros swing. Sure it looks effortless on the surface but his back has been ripped to shreds over the years and swinging as hard as you can from the top is never going to be the most efficient means to hit a golf ball.  Putting the speed on at the right time is how a swing can be perceived as effortless by a golfer. Even if the intent is to do nothing you will still do something but the goal should still be to let the club do most of the work. In my opinion trying to hit the ball as hard as I can and asking myself what is the minimal amount of effort needed to get the job done are too very different things.  
    • You’re some what making my point here? Hit the ball badly and get a 208 yard result or hit it well and get a great result (246 yards)? To improve your total distance by simply swinging harder is very difficult for most people.  If you are hitting the ball so badly that a 94 mph swingspeed delivers only 208 yards, to increase the total distance to 245 yards, without making swing changes, requires a swingspeed of around 110 mph.  I just can’t see that happening for most people? In addition, quality of strike generally deteriorates as swingspeed increases - it stands to reason that hitting the ball in the middle becomes more difficult if you’re trying to swing out of your shoes.
    • The evidence is all around you should you choose to accept it or not and golf isn't the only sport that is experiencing this. The gap between the best and the worst players, especially in Pro sports, is ever decreasing and this is fact.  It is more difficult to be a Pro or College athlete than it was 20 years ago and it is becoming more difficult everyday.  Technology, coaching, and training are without question better than 20 years ago. Bigger, faster, and stronger athletes are also choosing golf and a 6'2" 180 lb golfer simply has a better chance to make it to the pros in relation to a 5'8" 160 lb golfer if  they are both being introduced to the game at the same time and being exposed to the same training modalities. That is why the NFL combine exists because the foundation of sport is based on measurables. The bigger, faster, and stronger athletes have the best chance to succeed in sport. Not saying they will...but they have the best chance to succeed.      Even if the fields are marginally better...the fact is...it is harder to be dominant now than it was 20 years ago because golfers are better so those margins are harder to overcome. It all trickles down from the top and makes it tougher to succeed at all levels of the sport.  Corey Pavin doesn't even exist on tour in today's day and age because hitting it 250 doesn't cut it on tour today.  Not when there are videos of 13 year old on youtube shooting 63 from the tips at respected golf courses in sanctioned tournaments while hitting it 290 yards off the tee. That shift has happened within one generation of the sport and all sport right before out eyes.  
    • I don't understand why you would say that.  Tiger was not and is not the most influential golfer ever.  In fact when it comes to style, I'd say he has had a somewhat negative influence.  And, he was a coddled child literally bred to play golf; that's not something that golfers can aspire to.  So, I'm not sure what you mean by "influential."   Vardon was the early innovator and introduced the grip that most people still use.  Jones was a major celebrity and elevated the game worldwide, demonstrated utmost integrity, gave true meaning to "play for the love of the game", as well as being a pioneer in instructional video and an excellent writer, to boot. Hagen innovated wedge bounce.  Hogan's swing is more influential than Tigers, to this day.  Player introduced working out and nutrition.  Palmer was a celebrity-media pioneer.  ...  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. asimpson1211
      asimpson1211
      (44 years old)
    2. dfriend1
      dfriend1
      (54 years old)
    3. gmohr
      gmohr
      (64 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...