Jump to content
IGNORED

Consider What a 20% Ball Roll-Back Would Mean


iacas
Note: This thread is 2242 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
5 minutes ago, NM Golf said:

So here is a question I have, how do you even dial a ball back say 20%?

The same way you determine the standard now. You simply move it backward 20%.

It's not going to be 20% for everyone. Some may lose 22%. Some may lose only 19%.

But you've still rolled the ball back 20%.

https://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/Equipment/TPX3006-overall-distance-and-symmetry-test-procedure.pd

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 2/28/2018 at 1:33 PM, iacas said:

I don't feel as though you really read the first post.

EVERY course would have to be dramatically altered. EVERY course.

Truthfully, I didn't read all of it. Shame on me.

I do get your point about the 20% aspect versus your reference to 10%. I get that. I also see how all courses would have to be dramatically changed. I just feel like that would be... manageable, still. Then again I'm the furthest thing from a course architect. Hell I'm sure my depth perception alone is below average!

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
6 hours ago, Groucho Valentine said:

They'll find a way. 

large.house_eyes_looking.gif

  • Like 2

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 hours ago, GolfLug said:

20 percent??? Good lawd...senior tees.. here I come..:-O

Hell! I'm already there! If they knock me back any further I'll bee teeing off the ladies or the kids tees! The argument, or at least one of them, has been that too much real estate is needed to build courses that will hold a pro's game. But, look at Harbour Town. It's not that long from the tips, but it's a challenging layoutr due to the design. Maybe we should look at course design a little closer. Look at the Honda Classic just concluded. 15 and 17 are not really long par 3's, yet they played well above par. Why? Due to how the holes were designed in relation to the wind. There's nothing wrong with the game, leave the damn ball alone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

25 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

The argument, or at least one of them, has been that too much real estate is needed to build courses that will hold a pro's game.

But I've never seen a PGA pro even want to play the courses I play; so why punish me? ;-)(I have played Colonial a few times, but not the Colonial set up for the PGA.) Best, -Marv

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I still have not read nor heard any good argument for rolling back the golf ball. Poor Jack, he’s Jack, but he’s just making an ass of himself. Golf is hard. Always will be and the game will always win. ‘Making golf courses obsolete’ he says. Ridiculous. Jack is just sadly becoming a disgruntled old man. Hell he even admitted he doesn’t even watch golf anymore ....butt out Jack. Let ‘em bomb it. There will always be bogeys no matter how far they hit it.

   

  • Thumbs Up 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When was the last time anyone heard Jack say anything positive regarding the game? I believe his only concern regarding the it is keeping his name out there, so he can enhance his business ventures such as course design, club manufacturing, apparel, ice cream(???) etc. relevant. As far as courses becoming obsolete, when exactly has that been a problem? The one week a year a very select few hold a tournament? Usually on a course so private, or expensive, most golfers will never get on it anyway? (My heart bleeds for the Merion's and their memberships, LOL) Golfs governing bodies should worry more about the game the amateurs play, and growing it properly. Instead, they worry about nonsense like groove, anchoring putters, balls going to far etc. If Tour players are hitting the ball too far, let the Tour decide how to handle it. Jack and the USGA can round up every amateur who thinks they hit the ball too far, and they wouldn't be able to fill up a taxi. 

  • Like 1

PING G400 Max 9*  Taylormade  M2 15*  Callaway Steelhead XR 19* & 22*   Callaway Apex CF-16 5-GW  Callaway MD3 54* & 58*  RIFE 2 Bar Hybrid Mallet 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
7 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I still have not read nor heard any good argument for rolling back the golf ball. Poor Jack, he’s Jack, but he’s just making an ass of himself. Golf is hard. Always will be and the game will always win. ‘Making golf courses obsolete’ he says. Ridiculous. Jack is just sadly becoming a disgruntled old man. Hell he even admitted he doesn’t even watch golf anymore ....butt out Jack. Let ‘em bomb it. There will always be bogeys no matter how far they hit it.

   

get off my lawn.jpg

  • Like 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 hours ago, jkelley9 said:

I just feel like that would be... manageable, still. Then again I'm the furthest thing from a course architect. Hell I'm sure my depth perception alone is below average!

Let's take #18 at Augusta National as an example.

I see two design changes,

Option 1, you keep the distance from the tee relative to the fairway bunkers. So the design of the hole isn't drastically changed from off the tee. Then to maintain the similar distance to the green, you would need to move it. This would make the hole 383 yards instead of it's 460 yards.

Option1.jpg

Option 2, you keep the green were it is at, and move the tee box way forward to adjust for the 20% distance loss. The issue with this scenario is that it now takes the PGA Tour average drive that lands just in the first bunker and moves it into the 2nd bunker. This would allow longer hitters, even with the 20% decrease, to bomb it past the 2nd bunker.

Option2.jpg

Either option is costly. Not all courses can face these added costs, let alone the drastic changes to how the course will be played.

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

39 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Let's take #18 at Augusta National as an example.

I see two design changes,

Option 1, you keep the distance from the tee relative to the fairway bunkers. So the design of the hole isn't drastically changed from off the tee. Then to maintain the similar distance to the green, you would need to move it. This would make the hole 383 yards instead of it's 460 yards.

Option1.jpg

Option 2, you keep the green were it is at, and move the tee box way forward to adjust for the 20% distance loss. The issue with this scenario is that it now takes the PGA Tour average drive that lands just in the first bunker and moves it into the 2nd bunker. This would allow longer hitters, even with the 20% decrease, to bomb it past the 2nd bunker.

Option2.jpg

Either option is costly. Not all courses can face these added costs, let alone the drastic changes to how the course will be played.

 

 

 

The members tee for 18 is 385, they wouldn't really need to rebuild anything (for the pros), also long hitters are always going to have an advantage no matter how much they roll it back.

image.png.9cfdf0e78a7793baaec7454d62020ef5.png

Edited by JxQx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, JxQx said:

 

 

The members tee for 18 is 385, they wouldn't really need to rebuild anything (for the pros), also long hitters are always going to have an advantage no matter how much they roll it back.

image.png.9cfdf0e78a7793baaec7454d62020ef5.png

It’s still changes the hole drastically for the pros. Now where you might have a handful of guys bombing it over the bunker. Now you have dozens. 

It changes the course for the members. Now you need a tee box further up for them. Now the hole changes from a dogleg to a pretty straight hole. It also might take the bunker out of play for the members. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 2/28/2018 at 9:07 PM, saevel25 said:

Zero is the magic number. 

 

+1

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The future of golf with a 20% reduction in ball distances, what the typical golfer would look like. . .

See the source image

 

And the ladies. . .:

See the source image

 

 

On the petite side. . .

BO-8.jpg

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

An article from Golf Digest just popped up on my phone this morning.    This debate over the golf ball going too long has been going on since around 1936.   

  • Like 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

43 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

An article from Golf Digest just popped up on my phone this morning.    This debate over the golf ball going too long has been going on since around 1936.   

This answers one of @iacas‘s questions in the OP.  Roll back to when, you say?

1935 obviously!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 hours ago, iacas said:

The same way you determine the standard now. You simply move it backward 20%.

It's not going to be 20% for everyone. Some may lose 22%. Some may lose only 19%.

But you've still rolled the ball back 20%.

https://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/Equipment/TPX3006-overall-distance-and-symmetry-test-procedure.pd

IACAS,      So about the opening post, the thing i've said many of times about the courses now is, why is it always about trying to make a course longer?     

nobody ever says Merion GC isnt long enough and that course always plays tough...  Or i believe you said the Honda classic course which is just over 7000...    jmo when courses are playing out to 7400+ , i think it's more of a penis showing competition lol   

dialing back the golf ball jmo is dumb..... there are already standards for the golf ball and clubs...   

courses can make the fairways narrower, greens slower lol or more challenging...  i dont want to see every course be "target" golf,  but there is always a way to make a course tougher...  but these guys are so good that they will still eventually figure out a way to go low...  

and for the average Joe Golfer.....probably 90% of us, are driving 270 or less.... and the courses we are playing if we are playing them from the right tee's we are playing 6500 yards or less  

 

It is what it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 3/2/2018 at 3:00 PM, David L Yskes said:

probably 90% of us, are driving 270 or less...

99% and much less. Lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

99% and much less. Lol.

Tru dat. LOL

PING G400 Max 9*  Taylormade  M2 15*  Callaway Steelhead XR 19* & 22*   Callaway Apex CF-16 5-GW  Callaway MD3 54* & 58*  RIFE 2 Bar Hybrid Mallet 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2242 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 12: Same as last couple days, but focus was on recentering aspect of flow. When I recenter earlier I make decent contact most swings but if I recenter late or not at all it’s a roll of the dice. 
    • A couple of things.  Some of the clubs in your bag should be dropped immediately.  A 2-iron for example with what obviously seems to be a lower swing speed or possibly not great swing yet is a definite no-no.  To be hitting that 120-140 yards, which I assume includes run, is a sign that you are not getting the ball airborne at the correct angle to maximise distance.  The reason your 3 and 5 hybrid are going the same distance is that your launch angle is better with the 5.  Loft is your friend. Ideally I would suggest going to a golf or sporting store where you can hit golf balls on a simulator without being disturbed to understand your club carry distances and hopefully swing speed.  With that information we can definitely guide you better.
    • Let us be clear, unless you have proof of cheating, you just sound like a case of sour grapes.  In our club we have a guy who won club titles for many years.  Yes, he was a low single digit handicapper, but there have been quite a few others who played at his level.  Yet his mental strength and experience helped him win in many years when he shouldn't have.  Did he sandbag.  DEFINITELY NOT.  Did he just minimize his mistakes and pull out shots as and when needed.  Definitely.
    • Day 111 - Worked on my grip and higher hands in the backswing. Full swings with the PRGR. 
    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...