Jump to content
IGNORED

Patrick Reed vs. the Rules of Golf


Recommended Posts

After the Reed controversy one sports betting firm is refunding bets: (from twitter)

⚠️KARMA KOMMITTEE ALERT⚠️

There was no shortage of Patrick Reed talk on his way to winning the Farmers Insurance Open...

If you bet on a different golfer, we have your back! PointsBet is refunding ALL pre-tournament outright winner wagers on all other golfers in Free Bets! pic.twitter.com/SHH8OfslgV

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 529
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I just caught the entire clip of Reed walking up to the spotter and going through the entire process. Nothing looked out of the ordinary.  1. He didn't see it bounce from his shot. 2. He inquir

This is amazing. https://www.instagram.com/p/CK6fYccFPqL/  

Posted Images

  • Administrator
13 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Yesterday, there was another rules situation on the green where the ball moved after Reed removed his coin. The announcers didn’t know the correct rule. Someone corrected them on air. It’s your freaking job! Learn the rules!

Ken Tackett said “uh no, that’s not correct.”

I laughed.

It’s not really their job, but it should be a small part of it.

NFL announcers generally know the rules. Unless it’s incredibly basic it seems like most PGA Tour announcers get it wrong far more often than they get it right.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 minutes ago, MiuraMan said:

After the Reed controversy one sports betting firm is refunding bets: (from twitter)

⚠️KARMA KOMMITTEE ALERT⚠️

There was no shortage of Patrick Reed talk on his way to winning the Farmers Insurance Open...

If you bet on a different golfer, we have your back! PointsBet is refunding ALL pre-tournament outright winner wagers on all other golfers in Free Bets! pic.twitter.com/SHH8OfslgV

It seems insane to refund bets given no rules were broken. Even if they were do they refund bets in football for obvious missed/bad calls? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, boogielicious said:

Because they do not like Patrick Reed. Plain and simple but sad as well. 

Don't you still have time to get out and play 18 before the storm rolls in?😁🥶☃️

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
7 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Don't you still have time to get out and play 18 before the storm rolls in?😁🥶☃️

We sadly already have snow on the ground!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 minute ago, boogielicious said:

We sadly already have snow on the ground!

In Virginia we have snow, with a nice decorative coating of ice.  And occasional sleet just to make it a little crunchier.

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

We sadly already have snow on the ground!

If the snow gets any deeper you could always claim the embedded Boogielicious rule and toss yourself aside to Florida.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
4 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

If the snow gets any deeper you could always claim the embedded Boogielicious rule and toss yourself aside to Florida.

We could go out today and play in our 3in of rain. Rule in effect would be standing water more than embedded though. 

 

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Ken Tackett said “uh no, that’s not correct.”

I laughed.

I laughed at that one too. I mean hasn’t balls moving on a green been a consistent topic before and they still don’t get it? Sad really. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, phillyk said:

We could go out today and play in our 3in of rain. Rule in effect would be standing water more than embedded though. 

I'm building an ark. There will be a driving range off the stern and a small practice putting green on the deck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, snow bird said:

Also he asked an official observer if the ball had bounced and was told it didn't.

To be more clear...saying ‘ I didn’t see the ball bounce’ isn’t really the same as ‘the ball didn’t bounce.’ 
But the fact is a bunch of blowhards really blew this up out of their own stupidity and/or Ill bias towards PR. He followed the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, snow bird said:

It seems insane to refund bets given no rules were broken. Even if they were do they refund bets in football for obvious missed/bad calls? 

They probably didn’t have that many bets so refunding them was a cost-effective PR move.

17 minutes ago, phillyk said:

I laughed at that one too. I mean hasn’t balls moving on a green been a consistent topic before and they still don’t get it? Sad really. 

It did change in 2019.

10 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

To be more clear...saying ‘ I didn’t see the ball bounce’ isn’t really the same as ‘the ball didn’t bounce.’ 

He asked “did you see the ball bounce?“ And her response, the first word, was “no.”

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

In Virginia we have snow, with a nice decorative coating of ice.  And occasional sleet just to make it a little crunchier.

Not looking like any golf for a little while.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Just now, jsgolfer said:

Not looking like any golf for a little while.

We both had our Orlando trip, we're some of the lucky ones.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

To be more clear...saying ‘ I didn’t see the ball bounce’ isn’t really the same as ‘the ball didn’t bounce.’ 
But the fact is a bunch of blowhards really blew this up out of their own stupidity and/or Ill bias towards PR. He followed the rules.

No offense taken. 😉 And is it really that hard to understand?  This isn't hating Tiger cuz he likes porn stars or some other non golf related thing.  This is being skeptical of the at least somewhat awkward way a person who has been known to cheat handled a rules situation that gave him an advantage.  This isn't just a simple "yall are a bunch of haters" stuff.  You guys can't see that?

Have we heard from the playing partners and their caddies yet?  If I can hear their confirmation of his claim that he asked them, that would help things.

Edited by Golfingdad
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I watched Dottie's take and if I am reading between the lines correctly, it seems her take of having a RO present as a rule- I think she meant an unspoken rule amongst players - is not just about ensuring the the proper rules process as much as ensuring that the integrity of the judgment against allegations of cheating was protected for the player. 

So in effect it seems like she is saying something like - golf rules are supposed to be self policed but go ahead and pull in a RO anyway on the simplest of rulings (100 percent cases, as she said) just so you can CYA, since ya know, there are the Rorys who you can do trust falls on all day and then there are the Reeds who hasn't earned enough integrity brownie points along the way.

AdmittedIy, I was one of the band wagoner who cried foul so can see why she said that. One of the CBS guys, can't remember Faldo, Finch or Nobulo said something to the effect of - treat it like an accident scene, don't touch anything until the cops arrive - i.e., CYA.

Rules expect integrity to be a given, but we don't for whatever reason so I don't blame them for thinking that way. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

I watched Dottie's take and if I am reading between the lines correctly, it seems her take of having a RO present as a rule- I think she meant an unspoken rule amongst players - is not just about ensuring the the proper rules process as much as ensuring that the integrity of the judgment against allegations of cheating was protected for the player. 

Then her case should be that the PGA tour should make it mandatory that every rules official is present at every situation. If not, then she can't claim that because players get to make the choice of they need and RO or not. 

The level of attention they put on Reed that he is guilty and have to prove his innocence is absurd and to not go after Rory for the same thing. 

It's basically, Golf News needs to push this crap to have talking points. 

I get it, Reed doesn't make his life easy for these situations. He should be applauded for actually doing the right thing here. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
15 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

Have we heard from the playing partners and their caddies yet?  If I can hear their confirmation of his claim that he asked them, that would help things.

I'm guessing that he would have asked them as they're walking up after their second shots, but I haven't seen video of that.  The video DOES show Reed telling them something like "I'm going to check this out, she said it didn't bounce".  

I can understand that some people will take an extra critical look at PReed, based on their opinion of his past.  But I believe that some percentage of people start from "PReed is a cheater" and go immediately to "PReed cheated this time" without looking at the video or any other "evidence."  In my opinion, the video doesn't conclusively show that PR didn't manipulate things, and doesn't show that he didn't clean the ball before setting it down.  It doesn't exonerate him.  On the other hand, it doesn't show that he DID those things either.  So the evaluation depends on whether we believe that he did one or both of those things with the camera right next to him, filming nearly every move he made.  To me, that's extremely unlikely, which is why I really believe he did everything within the rules.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Then her case should be that the PGA tour should make it mandatory that every rules official is present at every situation. 

Me thinks that bridge has been crossed a few times already. I'm sure the PGA has their reasons to not go that route. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to Patrick Reed vs. the Rules of Golf

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • @iacas do I need to do anything further to earn the breaking 80 badge. Thanks, Bob
    • Check them with a sharpie line test and see what your dynamic lie is with those clubs. Then you can decide if you want to adjust them flat or are happy with the ball flight from them.
    • My memories and reviews of the courses we played, finally: Sandbox 10 of 10 Just fun, 40 yards to 170, most under 100 yards, many options to play each hole, including putting, low lofted chip and run, to traditional pitches.  Highlights include 5 or 6 birdies the first two days, 1 over par on day 2 for total 52 strokes.  Also was the first to lose the “no sixes” challenge by going bunker to bunker on Hole 2 on the first day. Mammoth Dunes 8 Huge golf course, first fairway was over 100 yards wide, first green was probably 50 yards wide.  Maybe reading the Golf Club Atlas article helped me, but I was able to discern the major v-shaped ridge the course was built on and around.  Greens were generally pretty welcoming on many sides, in lots of areas a ball would funnel onto the putting surface.  However,  there were a few very deep greenside bunkers, in particular on the short 13th.  I enjoyed the course while playing fairly poorly.  Given the width of most fairways, I think additional rounds would lead a player to explore a variety of angles, there were a lot of ways to play most of the holes.  Or maybe the best way to play a hole would vary significantly depending on pin position.  I’d like to get a chance to figure it out a little more. Sand Valley 7.5 From satellite photos it would be hard to discern many differences between Sand Valley and Mammoth Dunes, but playing them becomes two very different experiences.  At Sand Valley the fairways seem a bit tighter, and the areas surround the greens generally funnel balls away from the green.  To me, this meant it played substantially tougher.  I also felt like there were more uphill walks, especially on the front 9, including several climbs to get from a green to the next tee.  Of course, that type of design tends to result in downhill tee shots, as was the case for almost every hole here.  A notable exception was Hole 7 (Dan’s favorite), which required a blind uphill drive to a “fade” fairway with sand on both sides beyond a certain distance.  Highlights for me were #1, with birdies both days, and #17 with two pars (driver on day 1, 3-wood on day 2).  Lowlights were some kind of high number on #2 (first day) after playing back and forth across the raised green a few times. All in all, I think I prefer Mammoth Dunes, but I’m glad we played Sand Valley twice. If I lived and played here regularly, I’d probably play Mammoth 6 times out of 10.  If I get back there, I’ll almost certainly play shorter tees than I did.    Lawsonia Links. 8.5 We went from modern courses designed by well-respected current designers to a 90-year old course, designed by well-respected designers of their time.  I really enjoyed the look of this course, its a style from a bygone era.  For the most part the course appears to follow the original terrain.  But the designers dug relatively linear bunkers and/or hollows, piling the excavated material to form linear mounds.  And they moved a lot of earth for at least a few of the greens, creating very steep drop-offs.  In many cases, the bunkers and mounds were well short of the greens, requiring a shot to carry the bunker or hollow, but not requiring the ball to carry all the way to the green.  This also confuses the depth perception at times, “just over the bunker” wasn’t anywhere close to being on the green.  Conditions were very good, the greens had plenty of contour, but never seemed to leave an “impossible to get close” putt.  Unlike the very tight turf at the Sand Valley courses, the turf here was a little more lush, so perfect contact on short game shots was a little less critical.  And there was rough, and beyond that some tall fescue, as opposed to the native sand at the previous courses.   The clubhouse and range and other facilities were pretty modest, but the staff were friendly and efficient.  Our foursome enjoyed the first few holes so well we decided that a second 18 was a great idea.  This is also where I had my best round, 76.  As much as I try to evaluate courses based on their merits, the quality of my play is bound to be at least a subconscious factor. Lac La Belle 7 This is a very recent rebuild on the site of a previous course.  From what I’ve read, there’s very little remaining from the old course, its been almost entirely redesigned.  Conditions were excellent, and the course is very pretty.  Its pretty demanding in places, with woods or creeks or bunkers on both sides of the fairway, and mostly slightly to significantly elevated greens.  Greens varied, some relatively small, others were huge and heavily contoured.  I thought in that on a few of the greens the slopes were too severe for the speed of the greens, but that was only a few.  The facilities were excellent, a good driving range, nice new clubhouse.  But the course just doesn’t stand out to me, its a good modern golf course.  And there are just a few goofy greens, 60 yards or more deep, really severe contours, its as if they’re done that way to inspire conversation, not to actually play. All in all, we played some really good golf courses, each and every one.  Of the 5 full-size courses, the ones I’d like to play most are Mammoth Dunes and Lawsonia Links. 
    • To me this is fairly simple geometry.  If you're set up right, your hips will turn around an inclined axis.  Imagine a hula hoop around your waist, tilted a little.  That means that in the backswing, your lead hip will move "around" that axis, away from the target, closer to the ball, and closer to the ground.  The trail hip does the opposite.  So your lead leg has to increase flex, your trail leg has to extend.  The opposite happens in the forward swing.   As to what feel will produce the most efficient movements, that's going to vary from person to person.  
    • Any guys here know the courses up near Albany/Saratoga Springs area ? Driving up from Northern NJ and doing a three day up to the race course in Saratoga Springs and would like to place a course close to the NY thruway going up and coming back. We already have a tee time at Saratoga National so looking for one or two more nice tracks. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. camerongautx
      camerongautx
      (30 years old)
    2. CyboNinja
      CyboNinja
      (40 years old)
    3. Hawk367
      Hawk367
      (54 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...