Jump to content
iacas

Speed from the Arms in the Golf Swing

188 posts / 33911 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Puttin4Dough said:

I'm not arguing anything.  The other OP made an observation about it "appears" the arms are swinging, but the speed of the arms is amplified by the unleashing of torque.  Think about hitting balls with your feet together....sure one can hit the ball, but nowhere close to the distance with maximum coil.

You still seem to be missing the point.

A large percentage of the speed of the clubhead can come from just the arms. The background is that the swing is not driven with very little effort coming from the arms, but via body rotation only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

6 hours ago, iacas said:

You still seem to be missing the point.

A large percentage of the speed of the clubhead can come from just the arms. The background is that the swing is not driven with very little effort coming from the arms, but via body rotation only.

100% agree...body rotation.  Otherwise a baseball pitcher wouldn't bother winding-up to throw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 4/12/2018 at 4:29 PM, iacas said:

In another topic, the idea that the arms contribute (significantly) to clubhead speed was discussed. Some feel the arms are "passive" or exert no "effort" while others feel they are anything but passive and exert a great amount of effort. The video and the discussion below is meant to continue that conversation.

@Puttin4Dough This.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I am grasping the premise of what this video is demonstrating but I don't think that it was demonstrated properly.  If you were only trying to isolate the arms then you should be sitting in a chair ,keeping your shoulders parallel to the target line the whole time, and not setting your wrists which you showed provided 45 mph.  I doubt that you would then generate 95 mph of swing speed and would probably make about half of that. I say this because when you demonstrated the upper body swing you had the benefit of hitting against a stable base and torso because the point was to try to use no lower body at all. However you did set your wrists and that contributed with 45 mph of extra speed that you didn't have when you did the lower body only swing.  Your arms only swing has the benefit of using the wrists as a lever where as the  lower body only swing did not.  The speed of your arms was transferred to a lever point, the wrists, and speed was added, where as if you didn't set your wrists then that would have been more accurate because the speed of the arms would have been transferred directly to the club, and the speed delivered would have been much less. This is exactly what happened in the lower body swing but you had to drag the club through impact because the intent was to only use the lower body. 

The lower body only swing had no kinematic transfer of speed, where the arms only swing did, and this where I see your experiment was flawed.  I am in the camp of feeling like my upper body is passive and that I don't set my wrists but I know that it is happening at some point in the swing because I swing 118 mph.  I know that I have fast hips and I try to feel like my upper body, lower, body, and the club, are coming through impact all at one time but I know that is not what is happening in reality because feel is not real of course.  I hope my explanation was clear and that my point was made. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I think I am grasping the premise of what this video is demonstrating but I don't think that it was demonstrated properly.  If you were only trying to isolate the arms then you should be sitting in a chair ,keeping your shoulders parallel to the target line the whole time, and not setting your wrists which you showed provided 45 mph.  I doubt that you would then generate 95 mph of swing speed and would probably make about half of that. I say this because when you demonstrated the upper body swing you had the benefit of hitting against a stable base and torso because the point was to try to use no lower body at all. However you did set your wrists and that contributed with 45 mph of extra speed that you didn't have when you did the lower body only swing.  Your arms only swing has the benefit of using the wrists as a lever where as the  lower body only swing did not.  The speed of your arms was transferred to a lever point, the wrists, and speed was added, where as if you didn't set your wrists then that would have been more accurate because the speed of the arms would have been transferred directly to the club, and the speed delivered would have been much less. This is exactly what happened in the lower body swing but you had to drag the club through impact because the intent was to only use the lower body. 

The lower body only swing had no kinematic transfer of speed, where the arms only swing did, and this where I see your experiment was flawed.  I am in the camp of feeling like my upper body is passive and that I don't set my wrists but I know that it is happening at some point in the swing because I swing 118 mph.  I know that I have fast hips and I try to feel like my upper body, lower, body, and the club, are coming through impact all at one time but I know that is not what is happening in reality because feel is not real of course.  I hope my explanation was clear and that my point was made. 

The wrists are indeed part of the arms.

I know in human anatomy the arm is technically from the shoulder to the elbow but @iacasis clearly working off of the common usage which extends to the hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I think I am grasping the premise of what this video is demonstrating but I don't think that it was demonstrated properly.  If you were only trying to isolate the arms then you should be sitting in a chair ,keeping your shoulders parallel to the target line the whole time, and not setting your wrists which you showed provided 45 mph.

The wrists are part of the arms. And…

3 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I am in the camp of feeling like my upper body is passive and that I don't set my wrists but I know that it is happening at some point in the swing because I swing 118 mph.

Your upper body is nowhere near passive, and your arms contribute significantly to the power and speed you're generating. Your arm muscles are firing and doing so quite a bit, regardless of your feels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Grizvok said:

The wrists are indeed part of the arms.

I know in human anatomy the arm is technically from the shoulder to the elbow but @iacasis clearly working off of the common usage which extends to the hand.

Right but he clearly demonstrated that the wrists by themselves created 45 mph of speed. Being that the arms and wrist swing created 95 mph the arms created 50 mph.  Like I said I get the point that he was trying to convey but I disagree with how the experiment was presented because the arms and the wrists are not the same and differences between the speed created by both was clearly demonstrated in the video.  If the wrists were taken out of the equation then his arms created about 50 mph or right about the same amount as his lower body created.  The arms can be isolated just like his lower body was isolated  so I feel the presentation was misleading but I understand the concept that he was trying to convey.  

Iacas I completely agree that the arms are in no way passive and are a significant power source despite anyone's best efforts to restrict them but like I said I feel like I am restricting them but that isn't what is happening in reality. That feeling shortened up my swing quite a bit and but I experienced a huge jump in accuracy while all swing speed was maintained.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Righty to Lefty said:

Iacas I completely agree that the arms are in no way passive and are a significant power source despite anyone's best efforts to restrict them but like I said I feel like I am restricting them but that isn't what is happening in reality. 

Please use the “@“ Iacas (start typing and your chosen person will come up) when you want to respond to a member. 

The above portion of your comment...let’s just leave it at that. I think you’re just cluttering the point ok?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Please use the “@“ Iacas (start typing and your chosen person will come up) when you want to respond to a member. 

The above portion of your comment...let’s just leave it at that. I think you’re just cluttering the point ok?

 

I'm not cluttering up anything...I see fault in how the experiment was conducted and see no reason to leave anything at that and no reason to not say anything about it.  The point is if you want to talk about arm speed then isolate the arms and don't include the wrists.  The wrists were isolated, the lower body was isolated, but the arm swing included the arms and the wrists. The arms were never isolated. If the point is going to be made then I feel that it should be thoroughly made or it will be questioned which is fair in my opinion.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I'm not cluttering up anything...I see fault in how the experiment was conducted and see no reason to leave anything at that and no reason to not say anything about it.  The point is if you want to talk about arm speed then isolate the arms and don't include the wrists.  The wrists were isolated, the lower body was isolated, but the arm swing included the arms and the wrists. The arms were never isolated. If the point is going to be made then I feel that it should be thoroughly made or it will be questioned which is fair in my opinion.  

The wrists are PART OF THE ARM. They were always going to be included in the experiment when measuring the swing speed of the arms. When you talk about the function of the arm in ANY SPORT the wrist and hands are ALWAYS included in that equation. ALWAYS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I'm not cluttering up anything...I see fault in how the experiment was conducted and see no reason to leave anything at that and no reason to not say anything about it.  The point is if you want to talk about arm speed then isolate the arms and don't include the wrists.  The wrists were isolated, the lower body was isolated, but the arm swing included the arms and the wrists. The arms were never isolated. If the point is going to be made then I feel that it should be thoroughly made or it will be questioned which is fair in my opinion.  

Unless the wrists are fused it’s impossible to swing a club without the wrists hinging. The club would just point straight up into the sky. Nobody swings like that. It’s like saying ‘you didn’t isolate your hips because your legs moved.’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

Right but he clearly demonstrated that the wrists by themselves created 45 mph of speed. Being that the arms and wrist swing created 95 mph the arms created 50 mph.

The wrists are part of the arms.

8 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

If the wrists were taken out of the equation then his arms created about 50 mph or right about the same amount as his lower body created.

It's not additive. I don't swing 50+50+45 = 145 MPH.

8 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

The arms can be isolated just like his lower body was isolated  so I feel the presentation was misleading but I understand the concept that he was trying to convey.

You don't seem to understand the concept, actually… The concept is that it speaks to the people who feel that you can just rotate your body and let your arms "whip around behind you" while doing nothing themselves. They're just attached to your shoulders and the swing, your body's rotation, effortlessly whips them around.

8 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

I'm not cluttering up anything...I see fault in how the experiment was conducted and see no reason to leave anything at that and no reason to not say anything about it.

You don't seem to understand what the experiment was intended to show, nor are you accepting that for all intents and purposes (based on what the experiment is intended to show), the wrists are part of the arms.

8 hours ago, Righty to Lefty said:

The point is if you want to talk about arm speed then isolate the arms and don't include the wrists.

The wrists are part of the arms.

I isolated the wrists because, as part of the arms but not part of the "shoulders" at all, people who think that the majority of the clubhead's speed come from body rotation alone can be dissuaded (if they're rational and logical) by just seeing how much speed you can generate from part of the arms - the wrists.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I play with a 54 yr old man, young guy, on a semi-weekend basis. When we first played, my other partner told me, "Watch this, his lower body does nothing and he doesn't make much of a turn - all arms."

That all-arms swing was putting it out 230-265 with regularity. Arms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/13/2018 at 11:21 AM, klineka said:

Great image showing how active/engaged Brooks' arms are just after impact

Yeah. Athletes haven’t gotten better. It’s clearly the equipment as these photos prove.

E7B5D20E-1AEA-40A7-944A-BE614C0F5160.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

Yeah. Athletes haven’t gotten better. It’s clearly the equipment as these photos prove.

E7B5D20E-1AEA-40A7-944A-BE614C0F5160.png

Besides being OT, a picture of Jack relaxed at the finish in comparison to Koepka at ~A7.5 holding onto the club for dear life doesn't really make your point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Battery? You step on the front tire and pull up. Flip a lever, push a button… and it's done.
    • It takes me about 20-30 minutes to get to the course. Once I get there, I like to unwind from the drive. I don't rush in the parking lot. I go by the John Wooden quote, " Be quick, but don't hurry." I play fast on the course, but I have to be relaxed to do so, so the parking lot takes as long as it takes.
    • I had just a stretch day yesterday and overall felt pretty good, so I decided to go back to the range to hit some drill PWs, just so I could do some disciplined work on my swing and build some momentum hopefully towards lasting change. Keep in mind, I can't even break 90 right now. Not because of putting and short game which IMO are perfectly fine (for example, I shot an under par round at the Jupiter Lighthouse mini-golf course recently), but because I would just hit so many awful full swing shots, there's simply no way it would happen right now. The good news is, the range is a magical place for me despite all the frustrations that come with trying to change one's swing.  So face-on looks perfectly fine to me right now, especially given the scores I anticipate I would shoot if I stepped on the course:   BTW, I hope everyone is cool with vertical video. I used to poo-poo it, but since I read the site a lot on my phone, vertical vids are actually preferred for me, but I can stop doing that if it's frowned upon still. But yea, I know that's a drill swing, but it seems like it's fine given my ability level. DTL however is a bit of a different story. This is more or less a full swing. Well close enough anyway:   Yea, not as promising looking as FO is. That said, after I left I went to grab a bite, and while watching some swings at the table while waiting for my food I noticed this: Elbow shifts behind me in transition which probably is compromising some of what I'm trying to do. And I don't do it in softer drill swings. From that nice DTL driver swing from Monday: And I'm not necessarily trying to copy Tiger, but he's such a good model for so many things, I'm just going to remind myself what he looks like at this point too:   I will say, working my swing again has been both totally frustrating, totally fascinating, and a lot of fun 😄. It's interesting how on drill swings the elbow doesn't shift behind me, but it does on full swings. It's definitely something I need to pay attention to if I want the kinds of elbow positions that make it easier to swing the club on plane. I know Rory McIlroy and others have weird elbows and stuff and are fine, but since I'm such a crap golfer, I think it's probably a good idea to apply some conscious thought to this so it gradually goes away with practice and time. I'm otherwise still working on the same things: Steep shoulder pitch in backswing, dip torso in early downswing, bring arms down faster relative to the body, open/slide/extend knees and hips, and now... don't let my trail elbow shift behind me in the transition.  Hopefully I feel good enough to get back out to this range in a couple days. I got a two hour PT session though in an hour with some BFR therapy so hopefully I get through that well given how sore I am at the moment lol. Baby steps continue....   Edit: I just wanted to add that because I'm dynamically working on several things,especially during rehearsal swings in between actually hitting the ball, this experience will likely be a bit more frustrating than normal. I know these are a lot of changes to juggle. I just want to remind myself that frustration and bad shots and everything else are just a part of the game, and the faster I learn to accept that, the better off I will be.
    • I tend to follow my surroundings and flow with the course (if I have played it before) and don't bother with how long I take to setup. If nothing is rushed, then I am not rushed. I don't sit in the car too long or take a large amount of time getting my gear ready. I judge accordingly, but I really don't like to be rushed. I pay my hard earned money to play just like the next person does. It doesn't take long to setup my equipment and put my shoes on. I am always reasonably well prepared before I even get to the course so if need be, I can be quick on the go. I believe it is all about respect to people and fellow golfers in general. Of course there are those that carry great disrespect for others and could give a rip about anything which usually bring challenges to what may be a good golf game.  Some weeks ago, me and a buddy played a course and there was a foursome that were in front of us at the first Tee that actually warmed up and stretched on the Tee box delaying those behind them! There were no less than two groups waiting behind us. After quite a wait and seeing this was not going to change, we decided to start on the 10 hole and while we drove the cart over to 10 (we could see #1 tee box from 10) and got set up on the tenth hole we could see they still had not finished. What is really bad is we tee'd up and drove our balls and two of them were still not finished!
    • One thing I will add is if your swing speed is 80-82 with a 6 iron, I doubt u hit it 196. Hit outside and check some more places for launch etc... but don’t do anything to the clubs yet.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Fourputt
      Fourputt
      (73 years old)
    2. Grizvok
      Grizvok
      (31 years old)
    3. laurakimberly
      laurakimberly
      (26 years old)
    4. Matt C
      Matt C
      (56 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...