Jump to content
IGNORED

PGA Level 3 Done… Membership Next


Note: This thread is 1112 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Jeeze...when I did it (25 years ago), you went to business 1, business 2, took playing test and were done. I’m sure this is something of a money maker for the pga?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Elections apparently take a few days… even though everything should be pretty automatic. I meet all of the requirements, so I should be in with about ten seconds of double-checking. But it took a few

Well, today I passed all of my Level 3 tests for the PGA apprentice (or "associate"?) program. I emailed in my application for membership, and the next election date is apparently July 2. So far as I

Posted Images

  • Administrator
8 minutes ago, davechen said:

Congrats!

And now you can qualify to play in the PGA Championship, right?

I suppose. But that ain’t happenin’.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/18/2018 at 6:32 PM, iacas said:

 

Why did it take me so long?

Though I appreciate that the PGA trains you in all facets of a golf operation, I sometimes found it difficult to work up the motivation to complete a work-study portion on Food & Beverage or Golf Car Fleet Management when I don't believe I'll ever want to do those things. I want to be an instructor, a teacher, a coach, and I've devoted ALL of my energy to that. I don't want to be a head pro, or a general manager.

 

While I certainly understand your point of view here, I think I understand where the PGA is coming from as well.  While you see yourself as a instructor for life, those things can change for people.   People can change, motivations can change, or certain opportunities arise.   The PGA wants to make sure all of it's members are well equipped to handle those situations and manage those things up to PGA standards.      

Not to say that this will happen, but you could turn 55 and be burned out of the teaching grind, but still want to remain in the golf industry.   then, by coincidence, some connection you've made along the way recommends you as the head pro position at Winged Foot is opening up.   While you may have never had aspirations of being a head pro or GM, a combination of changing motivations and unexpected opportunity has thrust you into the position.   Fortunately, the PGA prepared you for this.   

As someone who went to school for journalism and put myself on that track from the moment I started college, then got to the real world and found that I was better suited for business, I found myself pretty happy that my first two years I was in college they forced you to be well-rounded and forced me to log quite a few business courses.   It ended up making the burden considerably smaller when I went back and added an accounting degree. 

 

Also, Congratulations!

 

 

Edited by lastings
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, lastings said:

While I certainly understand your point of view here, I think I understand where the PGA is coming from as well.  While you see yourself as a instructor for life, those things can change for people.

Then you can go back and get more education. They (were creating) "jack of all trades master of none" types.

The PGM 3.0 program changing these things indicates to me that they agreed somewhat.

2 hours ago, lastings said:

Not to say that this will happen, but you could turn 55 and be burned out of the teaching grind, but still want to remain in the golf industry.   then, by coincidence, some connection you've made along the way recommends you as the head pro position at Winged Foot is opening up.

I doubt that the shit I learned 20 years ago would not apply or be relevant or even be anything I remember at that point.

2 hours ago, lastings said:

Fortunately, the PGA prepared you for this.

Not really. They didn't really prepare me for anything.

I know what you're saying… but I don't think you understand how pointless the classes are.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

59 minutes ago, iacas said:

Then you can go back and get more education. They (were creating) "jack of all trades master of none" types.

The PGM 3.0 program changing these things indicates to me that they agreed somewhat.

I doubt that the shit I learned 20 years ago would not apply or be relevant or even be anything I remember at that point.

Not really. They didn't really prepare me for anything.

I know what you're saying… but I don't think you understand how pointless the classes are.

All fair points, and you know better than I as you have the experience.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

It feels good to be done. :-)

I bet it does! I certainly felt this way once medical school then residency ended. Residency was very much on point and necessary. However I'd say about 65-75% of medical school was useless knowledge and just academical torture. Congrats Erik!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Congratulations, I'm amazed that it took 8 years, but I guess good things are worth waiting for. 

Out of Interest, how much did your golf improve once you were working on it full time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
3 hours ago, Moxley said:

Congratulations, I'm amazed that it took 8 years, but I guess good things are worth waiting for. 

Out of Interest, how much did your golf improve once you were working on it full time?

I've known people that can do it in 24 months. They require 36 credits of work, but count a four-year college degree as 12, so 24 months = 24 more credits.

I work on my game less now than I ever have. If you want to play a lot of golf, don't get a job in the golf industry. :-)

1 hour ago, paperclip said:

Congratulations!  And you can play in the PGA Championship too?

Yes, but since you're the third person to mention it… it's not gonna happen. :-) I'd have to not only finish high enough in our section PGA championship, but I'd have to finish top 20 nationally out of about 340 players. The first might happen some day (not this year). The second… no. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, iacas said:

Yes, but since you're the third person to mention it… it's not gonna happen. :-) I'd have to not only finish high enough in our section PGA championship, but I'd have to finish top 20 nationally out of about 340 players. The first might happen some day (not this year). The second… no. :-)

Hey, this is a funny game, you never know what's possible until you try 🙂

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, paperclip said:

Hey, this is a funny game, you never know what's possible until you try 🙂

Sure, but I think a lot of the 20 players who make it to the PGA Championship don't do much other than work on their own games.  I haven't checked, but I bet they're mostly from that point in the Coyne Hierarchy where they're attached to a club because the members like seeing their name in the press or something.  They're probably not fixing Aunt Betsy's slice or running junior golf camps or selling drivers.  And most of those 20 don't make the cut at the main event anyway.  A +2 handicap is spotting the worst of the participants in the PGA Championship something like three shots in an average round on one of those courses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Shindig said:

Sure, but I think a lot of the 20 players who make it to the PGA Championship don't do much other than work on their own games.  I haven't checked, but I bet they're mostly from that point in the Coyne Hierarchy where they're attached to a club because the members like seeing their name in the press or something.  They're probably not fixing Aunt Betsy's slice or running junior golf camps or selling drivers.  And most of those 20 don't make the cut at the main event anyway.  A +2 handicap is spotting the worst of the participants in the PGA Championship something like three shots in an average round on one of those courses. 

Maybe touring pros should not be allowed to play in the PGA Championship?  But isn't there another one for club pros only?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, paperclip said:

Maybe touring pros should not be allowed to play in the PGA Championship?  But isn't there another one for club pros only?

That's the one that has 320 people in it, where the top 20 make the PGA Championship.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1112 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • I’d recommend anything by @GeauGolf.
    • In Michigan we have universities that are both sides of the fence.    Eastern Michigan used the name Hurons but in 1991 changed to Eagles.   Central Michigan is still called the Chippewas with the permission from the local tribe.
    • Except that it is.
    • Once enough people decide something is offensive, you either change it or suffer the consequences.  The thing I find most interesting is the campaign it took to slowly drag enough people to that conclusion.  Certain groups have been working on this since 1940s. I remember seeing advertisements in Sports Illustrated from the 1970s that had pennants with alternative racist-slur nicknames for the non-native races. Kind of disappointed I couldn't find a picture of it online.  As recently as 2002, the same magazine ran a story that said over half of Native Americans did not consider the nicknames offensive. It was sort of suggested that the activists weren't necessarily on the same page with the population at large.  It's also sort of fun to look back at all the different sports teams and colleges that have changed their name and/or logo.  Stanford was one of the first, but there have been a number of others that I wasn't aware of.       
    • A group of people incorrectly called an incorrect term for hundreds of years is likely derogatory. to most reasonable people. Not quite the same level but here is another analogy: you work with people at an office and your name is Bob. Your co-workers know your name is Bob, but they only call you Bill. That's demeaning and disrespectful, unless you have consented.   Functionality and common knowledge or usage do not negate the derogatory aspect of words. Black people were called a certain word, it may be construed by some as functional, and everyone knows what it means; but, that does not mean it is acceptable nor does the functionality of the word negate the improperness of the word. The same logic applies here. Please note: I am not going to engage a debate as to the hierarchy of "Indian" and the other, but merely address the underlying reasoning. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chriswuk
      chriswuk
      (30 years old)
    2. Gero
      Gero
      (78 years old)
    3. nettscore
      nettscore
      (50 years old)
    4. RandMart3
      RandMart3
      (69 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...