Jump to content
SAGolfLuvr

Is worrying about my non-conforming clubs silly?

11 posts / 2333 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Good Day Gents,

My best handicap was 7.7 years ago. Now I am a 14.4 because I don't practice like I used to (time constraints and poor fitness). However I still love to play and will play in a tournament when I can. I try my best to follow all USGA rules. However, I play with Ping i3 irons. I can't find them on the conforming list. It bothers me that my clubs wouldn't be allowed in a USGA sanctioned event. Is it silly of me to think this way? Yes I see many others are also playing old non-conforming clubs but that doesn't matter to me. I just don't want to feel like I would be breaking a rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

Yes. I want to play in some Alamo City Golf tournaments this year to get some experience. Then play next year to see how I would place. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only matters for "Official" events. Anyone who would notice and complain in a casual round has issues. I play in many events and I can say for certain that I have never looked at my opponent or playing partner's bag. I wouldn't be shocked if someone I plaid against had 15 clubs. I have my own game to focus on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

For the current Rules, the requirement that clubs meet the 2010 groove is only adopted under a specific Condition of Competition, and the USGA suggest that this only be applied for very high-level competitions.  I doubt that a local tournament would have the requirement, so your i3 clubs will be perfectly legal.  See Decision 4-1/1, end of the second paragraph 

Quote

A Committee that wishes to limit players to clubs manufactured with grooves and/or punch marks that conform to all aspects of the Rules of Golf, including those that are effective from January 1, 2010, may adopt the condition of competition detailed below. While this condition of competition may be adopted for any competition, it is recommended only for competitions involving expert players (e.g., professional golf or the highest level of amateur golf).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As re you 100% sure your your I3s are non confirming? Is it the grooves that might be a problem? 

I would contact a Ping rep and ask to find out for sure. 

If you are not playing in a sanctioned events, or for a handicap, I probably wouldn't worry about it. Myself, when playing, I never worry about the equipment the other person is playing. This includes balls too. I just don't care. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am pretty sure the i3 irons are non-conforming to the groove regulation.  However, as stated earlier, this doesn't apply unless there is a condition in effect for the event you are playing.  This is what the USGA site I located says:

Clubs that conform to the rules that were in effect prior to Jan. 1, 2010 will continue to conform to the Rules of Golf until at least 2024, unless the Condition is in effect.

i3 irons have U grooves which met the rules prior to the 2010 cut off; I'm only familiar as I am playing the i3 O-Size irons.  I recall that my irons became non-conforming with the newer USGA groove rules.  My specific model irons don't appear in the USGA equipment search.  There are several i3 models listed in the USGA search tool.  You can find it at this link.  If I can manage to find where I read about my irons when this all came about, I'll pass it along.

https://www.usga.org/InfoClubsDB/intro.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DaveP043, Weberd27 and all that are telling me I should be fine. The rules Dave and Weberd posted make me feel much better about it. So now I can save up for some new clubs for 2024 and I have no excuse. Gents, Thanks again.

P.S. I checked the conforming database. My Ping i3 are non-conforming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just asked my club's mrn's club guru about the groove issue. He said that they had no intentions to impose a pga,  professionals' rule on the amateurs who play their courses. That making amateurs buy conforming groove clubs, would probably cost the GC, and the mens'/womens'  clubs lost revenue, due to a decline in members. 

Now to the purist, this is a poor attitude as far as rules are concerned. However, from a business stand point, it's not a bad call. 

He went on to say that most amateurs don't hit the ball well enough to take advatage of the difference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, like @weberd27 mentioned, clubs manufactured prior to 2010 are conforming until 2024, except for PGA Tour play or elite amateur events like the U.S. Am and similar events.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Golf is an obscenely expensive pastime.

Neither the R&A nor the USGA subsidizes my expenses.

That being the case, I play with the clubs and the number of clubs with which I most enjoy playing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • But you ignored the most important part. He was more accurate relative to the average player on tour than Tiger is to the average today.   Ummm.. No I didn't. He said nothing in that post. Nothing. That was a zero value added post. And he still thinks it is isn't clear Jack was more accurate. You are not smart enough to have an opinion.
    • You just took a pretty solid beating on that last post @TigerIsNumeroUNO. Your statements were incorrect and followed with a fact. Come on man.
    • Jack hit it much shorter than Tiger, so by "degrees offline" we don't know who was "more accurate." Jack played to wider fairways than Tiger typically plays to (which bounced and rolled out less, too), which would increase a player's fairways hit percentage. You aren't comparing apples to apples, hence my comment that you haven't actually "proven" this to be true. He wasn't "so far ahead of anyone." Jack was, throughout his career, more often behind several players in any given year. Tiger won more Vardons than Jack. Tiger won more money titles than Jack. Tiger was also player of the year more times than Jack. Nope. @turtleback, I believe, made a post at one point that detailed every year of Jack's career and talked about the years he could have won the Vardon or the POTY or the other awards, or what year he was clearly the best golfer. Long story short: the facts don't support your, uhhhhh, "recollection." IIRC, he has another post with more detail than this, including the years Jack was "not eligible" for some awards.
    • Statistically Jack was straighter both in percentage and he ranked higher relative to his peers in an era that placed a higher premium on accuracy. And it should just intuitively be correct, because Tiger is known for being inaccurate off the tee. The end. Can I definitively prove Jack would be much better than just top 10? No. But Jack was so far ahead of anyone during his time and before with his record and his continued well play into more recent times. Jack was runner up for the Vardon Trophy in 1983 past his prime. The quality of play didn't jump that much in the thirteen years between that point and when Tiger joined. Jack won ten money titles despite playing fewer tournaments than any other top golfer in his era.  He didn't even qualify for the Vardon Trophy most years. Jack was the first or second best player every year of his career up until age 40 regardless of whether he won player of the year in the same way Lebron James or Michael Jordan is the best player every year regardless of who they give the MVP to. Jack was not just another very good player most years who had a long career. He was the best or second best nearly every year of his career up to 40. I use other sports because I like people who have studied such things, not random internet opinions. That's why I linked the Ted talk.  Baseball has been studied more than any sport. A guy just made the assertion Babe Ruth would be MEDIOCRE AT BEST against Hank Aaron's pitching. I can't prove that Babe Ruth would be a star in Hank Aaron's era with 100% certainty. But you can get 99.9% of the way there. Close enough.  Here is Bill James pointing out how far of statistical outlier Babe Ruth adjusting for changes in era I feel like the guy who revolutionized how sports are analyzed has more credibility than random internet poster. And he was looking at 1927 to today. Hank Aaron played 40 years ago. On Babe Ruth Lost In Time | Articles | Bill James Online  
    • In my opinion, 'Need' is a very subjective term. Did I 'need' a new bag for father's day? No, but I 'wanted' one.... LOL
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dan42nepa
      Dan42nepa
      (63 years old)
    2. James Dalton
      James Dalton
      (78 years old)
    3. JMHARDING
      JMHARDING
      (29 years old)
    4. mwh1023
      mwh1023
      (52 years old)
    5. Skeesh
      Skeesh
      (47 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...