Jump to content
IGNORED

2018 Ryder Cup at Le Golf National - Paris, France


Note: This thread is 1009 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
6 minutes ago, skydog said:

It’s not only about the captains but Furyk deserves his fair share of criticism here. Inevitably it’s the players that lost it but Furyk made some indefensible decisions along the way and for that he should be criticized.

Bullshit. His picks were applauded and Bjorn’s derided. Webb was a poor choice people thought. Garcia a poor choice. Stenson too.

He sat Phil after Phil’s bad round.  It’s not like he kept playing him.

The Euro players played better. US players didn’t. Simple as that.

Players play. Captains give speeches. That’s about it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 821
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well played team Europe, and well done Bjorn who obviously knows his stuff better than most of us give him credit for. Great tournament 👍

There is a classic management mistake known as "hoping for A while rewarding for B." As you note, we hope that our players will perform well on one type of course, while we select them based on their

I think the posts about it being an exhibition and players not caring is sour grapes.  The players care (especially the younger guys)  they just lost.  No excuses about it they just need to play bette

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, iacas said:

Bullshit. His picks were applauded and Bjorn’s derided. Webb was a poor choice people thought. Garcia a poor choice. Stenson too.

He sat Phil after Phil’s bad round.  It’s not like he kept playing him.

The Euro players played better. US players didn’t. Simple as that.

Players play. Captains give speeches. That’s about it.

Whatever, I would call BS on this mentaility but I’m not going to change your mind. Or I could say the same thing about swing coaches but I won’t go there. 

Furyk deserves some criticism here. The shitty play deserves most of it. Phil was a terrible/indefensible pick and nothing but a nostalgic throwaway of a potential asset for the team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So looking ahead to 2020, who are the captains?

US: Will be interesting to see if Stricker gets another look in 2020 since it's in Wisconsin. Phil or David Duval probably the favorites, though, to get the nod. Zach J still in prime so doubt he'll get looked at yet. 

Europe: Harrington the first guy that comes to mind. Possibly Jiminez or Paul Lawrie. But I think it'll be Paddy.

Edited by ChrisP
Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, iacas said:

Bullshit. His picks were applauded and Bjorn’s derided. Webb was a poor choice people thought. Garcia a poor choice. Stenson too.

He sat Phil after Phil’s bad round.  It’s not like he kept playing him.

The Euro players played better. US players didn’t. Simple as that.

Players play. Captains give speeches. That’s about it.

Bollocks. Mickelson in the foursomes was a ridiculous shout, Mickelson full stop was a terrible pick, TW too for that matter, but you go on burying your head in the sand. I’m sure TW’s terrible RC record is all down to his partners right?

I for one hope he plays all 5 matches next time 👍

Edited by Hazsa
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
18 minutes ago, skydog said:

Whatever, I would call BS on this mentaility but I’m not going to change your mind. Or I could say the same thing about swing coaches but I won’t go there. 

Your position on swing coaches is equally as laughable.

19 minutes ago, skydog said:

Furyk deserves some criticism here. The shitty play deserves most of it. Phil was a terrible/indefensible pick and nothing but a nostalgic throwaway of a potential asset for the team. 

Indefensible? He was tenth on the points list and would have automatically qualified in many previous years. 

Tenth.

And he’s been a key figure on the committee/task force.

7 minutes ago, Hazsa said:

Bollocks. Mickelson in the foursomes was a ridiculous shout, Mickelson full stop was a terrible pick, TW too for that matter, but you go on burying your head in the sand. I’m sure TW’s terrible RC record is all down to his partners right?

I for one hope he plays all 5 matches next time 👍

You lose all credibility when you say that Tiger Woods was a bad pick.

Nice job of after-the-fact opinion sharing fellas.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

51 minutes ago, skydog said:

It’s not only about the captains but Furyk deserves his fair share of criticism here. Inevitably it’s the players that lost it but Furyk made some indefensible decisions along the way and for that he should be criticized.

I guess that's part of the fun of the Ryder Cup for some people (second-guessing every decision), but nothing Furyk could have done after making his captain's picks would have impacted the outcome in any significant way.

48 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Agree. The only decision I think he may catch some heat for is the Phil pick. Other than that, hindsight is 20/20 with his matchups and pairings. But most of the players didn’t have it this week and I don’t think changing things up or playing Webb more like Johnny said he should have done would have changed the final outcome. Europe was just better. They kicked our butt. 17.5 to 10.5 is a butt whooping that's on the whole team, not just a player or two. Plain and simple.

Exactly.

Regarding the Phil pick, I'm sure it's been mentioned in this thread, but that was NOT necessarily made in an effort to maximize the US chance of winning.  It was done partially because Phil has been a fixture at the Cup and this was probably the last year he could be even remotely defensible.  At its heart, the Ryder Cup is an exhibition...and "sentimental" picks are sometimes necessary.

7 minutes ago, iacas said:

Indefensible? He was tenth on the points list and would have automatically qualified in many previous years. 

Plus this - wasn't like he was some total bum.

Edited by Hardspoon
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, iacas said:

The Euro players played better. US players didn’t. Simple as that.

Players play. Captains give speeches. That’s about it.

^^^^ Absolutely. 

I do not understand the importance and scramble to find some underlying reason after a loss. The European players were simply better.

Congrats to their fans here on the site. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

And he’s been a key figure on the committee/task force.

You lose all credibility when you say that Tiger Woods was a bad pick.

Nice job of after-the-fact opinion sharing fellas.

Ok 👍

Enjoyed the RC. Hope we can mount a challenge in 2 years. Biggest problem for away teams of late seems to be making the singles with any realistic chance of victory.

Edited by Hazsa
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, iacas said:

 

Nice job of after-the-fact opinion sharing fellas.

And nice job of misrepresenting my opinion chief. I have said the Phil pick was a terrible one from the onset. Nothing after the fact about it.

And as for him being tenth in points- he hasn’t shown any form since the Spring and he is literally second to last on tour in driving accuracy...for a tight driving course, he was an indefensible pick for anything short of nostalgia. 

This isn’t about searching around for whom to blame. We played terrible and likely would have lost regardless. But Furyk deserves some of the blame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiger usually gets in automatically, but it's strange saying he's a bad pick. He doesn't have the best record, but in singles he's done pretty good, although I believe some wins have come after the RC was decided. He's played well this year and won the week before. He got some unlucky pairings and didn't play his best either. A commentator said he hadn't seen Tiger smile all week. He really didn't seem to enjoy being there and I agree that he doesn't excel in team competitions like he does as an individual. If he stays healthy he will likely be part of it next time too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Didn't watch it, but it went as I expected. I made a prop bet a couple months ago, and will collect on that later today. Not much winnings, but a win is a win. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, Zeph said:

Tiger usually gets in automatically, but it's strange saying he's a bad pick. He doesn't have the best record, but in singles he's done pretty good, although I believe some wins have come after the RC was decided. He's played well this year and won the week before. He got some unlucky pairings and didn't play his best either. A commentator said he hadn't seen Tiger smile all week. He really didn't seem to enjoy being there and I agree that he doesn't excel in team competitions like he does as an individual. If he stays healthy he will likely be part of it next time too.

Agree. He was the biggest no-brainer pick of anyone. That being said, he had a huge week last week and I'm sure it took a lot out of him to finally get that W, and then he had to turn around on a short week, travel across the world and play 72 holes in 3 days. It's a large task for anyone, especially someone in their 40s. If anyone noticed, Rose didn't play all that great, either, this week after winning the Fed Ex Cup.

I think Furyk would have ideally liked to have sat Tiger Saturday afternoon to rest for Sunday, but there were so many Americans not playing well and they were desperate for points, and he felt like he prolly was depending Tiger to get something rolling in that afternoon match. But he just never did. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was critical of some of Furyk's decisions before they backfired. Primarily putting Phil out in foursomes vs. fourball - but also running back the Woods/Reed pairing for a second time on Saturday. I thought those were both terrible decisions before they went south.

That said, captain decision making had no impact on this outcome. Europe outplayed the US in all facets and was a well deserving winner. Kudos to the European team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Welp.  

I guess my biggest takeaway here is anyone that thinks the home field advantage is not a massive bonus is out of their mind.  

Distance advantages can obviously be mitigated or exaggerated.  Fans, vibe, course knowledge, pride all weighs in. 

This sucks, but, good for Europe.  They certainly earned it. 

Edited by lastings
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You didn't see a lot of drivers out there. A combination of shorter holes, narrower fairways and penalizing rough. Being 30-40 yards closer in the rough wasn't necessarily a good thing at this course. You often saw them just having to hack something out of there and hope for the best. Being in the fairway was a big deal, and the longest hitters did maybe not get their potential out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Chris223 said:

He is an abomination in singles matches.  0-6 now

Why?  Seriously.  Too much talent to get obliterated like that. 

I think JT needs to take him out all winter long and just play matchplay every day against him, until he learns how to win. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas unfeatured and unpinned this topic
Note: This thread is 1009 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • As I’ve mentioned before, I’ve been using the phone app recently. I tried to use it at Mammoth Dunes but it wasn’t mapped, then the next day at Sand Valley and it had issues. I didn’t use it for the rest of the trip and honestly it was so much more enjoyable to play golf without worrying about if my tracking app was working properly. As much as I love to go back and see how far I hit shots and revisit my rounds, I’m probably done with it.
    • Did Cleveland ownership not vet those chunks of concrete?!
    • rotf, here we go again, has we cannot please our over-sensitive society. The racist Cleveland Guardians baseball team must be renamed - The Spectator World Major League Baseball has failed another major test. The new name for the professional...   The new name for the professional baseball franchise in Cleveland — Guardians — must go. As several states work to remove imperialistic statues of cis white men, the city of Cleveland has reached into its racist past to honor them. This is not the progress that Nikole Hannah-Jones has been dreaming of. And while we are at it, the logo for the Minnesota Vikings must go! Here is the definition of a Viking, in which the Scandinavian the people must be fuming about: Who were the Vikings? The Vikings were raiders, pirates, traders, explorers, and colonizers during the 9th to 11th century. They often traveled by sea from Scandinavia and took control of areas of Europe and beyond.
    • ... and what would that team name be?
    • Ah, so let's resort to name-calling. I won't lower myself to that. This is how I feel, that we as a country have become too soft and oversensitive. I mean the name Indians is offensive? lol. Like I said, if they wish to name and after my ethnicity that would be just fine, I would feel honored.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...