Jump to content
Phil McGleno

Kuchar Pays Caddie $5k, Is Shamed, Pays $50k

238 posts / 13348 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, chspeed said:

It makes it fun.

Hypothetical that's fun: "What would you do if you won $1.2M playing golf?"

Hypothetical that's not fun: "Let's all judge someone without knowing much of anything at all, including the most important facts."

This isn't really a true hypothetical. It's a real-world situation with real world people.

The horse is now glue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

The only conclusion I can come to after reading all of this is that Tom Gillis is a complete douche for putting his nose into other people's business.  And a double douche for doing it in a public, 'virtue signalling' manner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Additional details have come forward in this situation.

The caddie was paid $5,000 and was later offered an additional $15,000, which he turned down, because "he still hoped to receive another $45,000 from Kuchar, for a total of $50,000, the sum he thinks is a fair share of Kuchar's $1.3 million first-place check."

If someone offered me $15,000 even though I expected $45,000, I'm not turning down the $15,000 in hopes that I might get more later. That's dumb.

Looks like the original agreement between the caddie and Kuchar was "that he would be paid $3,000 for the week, plus an unspecified percentage of his winnings"

https://www.golf.com/news/2019/02/12/they-can-keep-their-money-kuchars-fill-in-caddie-breaks-silence-over-pay-dispute/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The caddie makes more in his regular job than I do lol.

Yeah, turning down an offer because you expected more but aren't likely to get any other offers is stoooopid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you agree for 3 or 5K.. and extra cash for the player earnings, just take what ever they give you and move on.

As a golf fan I will definetively would work for free that week, it´s an incredible experience.

If i work as a caddie i would just charge him with my regular fee and add that PGA tour win to my resume. It will definitively gave me better chances of winning more money for my work or even the posibility to caddie for a tour pro in the future. This caddie is now viewed as a conflicting one, non good player would look for his services.

At the Argentine open played at the end of 2018 (part of the PGA Latinoamerica Tour), a US professional golfer made a hole in one and won a Car. He gave it to his caddie, a local caddie that only carry his bag for that week, he didn´t finish top 10 and the price money he erned was almost nothing.      

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

If you agree for 3 or 5K.. and extra cash for the player earnings, just take what ever they give you and move on.

I agree, somewhat, sure.

22 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

As a golf fan I will definetively would work for free that week, it´s an incredible experience.

He's not, though, and comparing what you'd work for one week versus what he'd work for isn't fair to him.

I did note that in the article it says he makes up to $200 per day, but often closer to half that. So ~$150/day -> $5k for four days of work… I can see both sides of this. They agreed upon $3k, and he got 66% on top of that. In cash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

IMHO Kuchar comes out looking like a cheap bastard. They agreed on a price ($3000) for the week plus a bonus depending on how Kuchar placed. Kuchar then wins the tournament and doesn't even double the guy's salary. I realize the guy normally doesn't make a ton of money, but a $2000 bonus for winning a golf tournament worth over a million? I think the $15,000 offer was fair, but obviously hush money. I wonder if Kuchar would have paid an American caddy in such a way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If I read the info correct, the caddie was promised a bonus (before the tournament started). An unspecified percentage of the prize-money. So he got $2,000 bonus, which is less then 0.2%. They offered to pay $20,000, so thats $17,000 bonus, which is +/- 1.5%. Caddie turned that down, he expected a total of $50,000.

The big problem here is the ‘unspecified percentage’. This will allways give problems. The Kuchar team is a professional team and should not make such deals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

The Kuchar team is a professional team and should not make such deals.

A more accurate way of phrasing that is

"The Kuchar team is a business team and made a deal that put their profits/interests first, like any smart business team would do."

It takes two sides to agree to a deal. It's not like Kuchar held the caddie hostage and forced him to agree to the deal with unspecified terms.

Edited by klineka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, klineka said:

A more accurate way of phrasing that is

"The Kuchar team is a business team and made a deal that put their profits/interests first, like any smart business team would do."

It takes two sides to agree to a deal. It's not like Kuchar held the caddie hostage and forced him to agree to the deal with unspecified terms.

Not to me, the Kuchar team is a multi million dollar professional team. I call it taking advantage of the situation.  That is,  If the info is correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In my opinion, this is all completely blown out of the water. I’ve caddied for low tier profiessionals on a few occassions. I was happy to walk away with ~$400 for a weekends work. I’d have been just as happy if Kuchar asked me to hold his bag for $3000 for 4 days. I’m not his caddy, I didn’t travel with him the entire season sometimes forfeiting profit for missed cuts, etc. 

At the end of the day the guy carried his clubs. It’s not a million dollar job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I see both sides to this honestly. But I think what hasn’t been mentioned and isn’t necessarily a factor.. it’s not like Kuchar is a lottery winner, scored a big win and needs to be cautious on how much he shares of it. Kuchar is a multi-millionaire. Even 50k is peanuts to him. Without question if I had Kuchar’s money and was in this special circumstance I would’ve given the caddie 50k. Is Kuchar obligated to? No. Should the caddie be grateful for 15k? Sure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From Mark Steinberg (Kuchar's agent): “The “reports [sic] on what Matt’s caddie was offered are wildly inaccurate. However, it is inappropriate to discuss those amounts publicly.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

45 minutes ago, NM Golf said:

IMHO Kuchar comes out looking like a cheap bastard. They agreed on a price ($3000) for the week plus a bonus depending on how Kuchar placed. Kuchar then wins the tournament and doesn't even double the guy's salary.

Maybe, maybe not.

When did Kuchar offer up the $15k? He probably did so well in advance of the January 29th time frame in which Steinberg said "what Matt has offered is fair".

Cuz if so, and he gave him $20k (offered), that's almost 7x his agreed upon pay.

Also, in the interview in December 2018, the caddie said:

Quote

11. Asked if he made more money than Favela last week, Ortiz said, “I hope so!” He had not yet received or discussed his pay with Kuchar. He knows the standard caddie bonus is 10 percent of the winner’s share. Kuchar earned $1.3 million for his win, his first since 2014.

https://www.golf.com/tour-and-news/2018/11/13/matt-kuchar-mayakoba-caddie-18-things-to-know-el-tucan/

Now he says he got $5k in cash Sunday night? Hmmmmm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

33 minutes ago, MacDutch said:

Not to me, the Kuchar team is a multi million dollar professional team. I call it taking advantage of the situation. 

Multi million dollar professional teams/businesses exist, thrive, and grow by making business decisions that take advantage of the situation in front of them and do what is most profitable for them. Kuchar made a deal that was in his best interests.

The caddie wasnt forced to agree to the deal but he did anyway, then turned down an offer for nearly 7x his agreed upon pay. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, klineka said:

Multi million dollar professional teams/businesses exist, thrive, and grow by making business decisions that take advantage of the situation in front of them and do what is most profitable for them. Kuchar made a deal that was in his best interests.

Kevin, dude, his best interests also include having an attractive or good reputation, too. They're not all literally dollars and cents.

4 minutes ago, klineka said:

The caddie wasnt forced to agree to the deal but he did anyway, then turned down an offer for nearly 7x his agreed upon pay. 

Supposedly.

Given the contradictions, I'm still not sure what actually has happened in this whole thing, so, I'm getting off the train. It's too much speculation, not enough "known" for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, iacas said:

Kevin, dude, his best interests also include having an attractive or good reputation, too. They're not all literally dollars and cents.

That makes sense.

Not that it really matters or affects the story at all, but it makes me wonder if Kuchar would have paid him more had he known that the payment amount would have been made public. Maybe. Maybe not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • Who faced the tougher competition?   My analysis covers the 20 Masters Tournaments Woods has played in as a pro (1997 – 2019), and the first 21 Masters Tournament Nicklaus participated (1960 – 1982).   The Masters Tournament was chosen because the Masters is the only event played on the same course—Augusta National—each year.   I have one underlying assumption with regards to Tournament scoring. Golfing technology and equipment have steadily advanced. However, after researching the USGA opinions and the course overhauls that occurred in response to the technological advancements, I believe course designers have done a job preserving the emphasis on the player skill.    My assumption is that the efforts by executive committees to create more challenging courses has offset the permitted use of more advanced equipment. As a result I feel confident that the Tournament scores from the Nicklaus period in the sample (1960-1982) can be compared to the Masters leaderboards from the Woods period (1997-2019) within the margin of error of any statistical adjustment.      I merged the field from Woods’ first Tournament in ’97 with the field in Nicklaus’ first Tournament in ’60, maintaining the cut line at the top 50 qualifiers. I simply repeated this process through the 2019 and the 1982 Masters Tournaments.   In this period that I assessed, Woods did not participate in three tournaments ’14, ’16, and ‘17. Nicklaus did not participate in one tournament in ’67. Although the Masters Tournaments in ’61, ’73, 2003-2007 were played in poor weather conditions, after reviewing the cut lines, only ’03 and ’05 seem to be significantly affected by weather. A slight adjustment was made to players scores to normalize the scores.    After taking measure among the qualifiers during the merged tournaments displayed in the link, I found that the level of difficulty increased in the Woods’ era 28.1%.   ·     68% of the top 50 lowest qualifying scores are from the Woods’ era See 2ndsheet in link, labelled “top 50”   Additional Findings:   -      After merging the best of the two periods, Woods finishes with an estimated 4 green jackets and Nicklaus finishes with 2. -      If Woods competed in the Nicklaus period, Woods would have an estimated 9 green jackets. If Nicklaus competed in the Woods era, Nicklaus would have an estimated 5 green jackets. *Note: Nicklaus finished his career playing in 15 additional Masters Tournaments beginning in 1983. Woods is still active as of 2019. -      Woods finishes the 23 Tournament sample 106 below par. Nicklaus finishes the 23 Tournament sample 75 below par. Missing the hypothetical cut = +10 towards Masters career score.    Woods vs. Nicklaus  
    • A buddy of mine gave me a Bobby Jones 460cc black driver today and I played absolutely great with it! Highlight of today's round, however, was a beautiful 3 wood onto a par 3 that landed about 7-8 feet from the hole. There must have been a closest to the pin challenge earlier in the morning, because a marker was out there. My shot would have won it today had I been there to play in it 🙂 Overall, really solid round. Still some inconsistencies with iron play, but it's getting the better (the last three holes were really good with my 6, 7, 8, and W). 
    • Who knows. Maybe not happy that Nick reported the 2017 Champions Dinner story in the media. Tiger might have said things in that room that he expected the other Champions to keep to themselves instead of spouting to the media about it.
    • Not sure if it counts, but: Scrambled with some great guys today (foursome). We played an absolutely beautiful course. Shot a 73. 
    • You do realize my response was to “Diece”? But addressing your post, glad you are improving. However, even at 59, I usually play at 6700+ yards. On a mini tour, you will be at 7200 minimum, and expected to be under par, at least if you plan to play for a living. either way, golf should never define you. And making boast about a difficult game is a recipe for disappointment. But like most of the folks on this site, we will be ok if proven wrong. Will you be ok if we are proven right?
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Stillhacken
      Stillhacken
      (47 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...