Jump to content
Phil McGleno

Kuchar Pays Caddie $5k, Is Shamed, Pays $50k

244 posts / 17274 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, turtleback said:

Integrity also means doing what you say you will do, and I've seen 0 evidence that Kuchar didn't do what he said he would do. 
 

I disagree. If Kuchar said the pay would be $3k, plus a bonus for cashing, then proceeded to give the caddie and envelope with a 0.15% "bonus" on top, then that speaks to his character. 

Reasonable minds can disagree about whether $15k was fair vs. $50k in that scenario. But giving the guy an additional $2k is wrong by just about any measure.

Essentially what you are arguing is that because the bonus agreement was not spelled out in black and white, Kuchar was free to do as he pleased as long as he gave the guy something. 

Question for you - would you be arguing for him if he added a $1 bonus, for a whopping total of $3,001?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

25 minutes ago, turtleback said:

I think it was when you said: We're not often in a position where someone helps us win $1.3M.

I meant it as literally as it gets - he carried the bag and raked the bunkers. That's helping over Kuchar having to do it himself.

I'm on record as having said he may have cost Kuchar more than he helped him when talking about a caddie's other tasks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, Big C said:

Reasonable minds can disagree about whether $15k was fair vs. $50k in that scenario. But giving the guy an additional $2k is wrong by just about any measure.

Colin, I agree that Kuchar comes across as cheap for what lot of us (me included) think is a stinking low bonus for what he won but that it's 'wrong' and that he 'screwed him over' sounds a bit harsh, no?  

40 minutes ago, Big C said:

Question for you - would you be arguing for him if he added a $1 bonus, for a whopping total of $3,001?

But he didn't! He gave him $2K. If MK really wanted to screw him over, he would have done just that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

Colin, I agree that Kuchar comes across as cheap for what lot of us (me included) think is a stinking low bonus for what he won but that it's 'wrong' and that he 'screwed him over' sounds a bit harsh, no?  

I do think it was wrong. If Kuchar had a handshake agreement to give a bonus for a tournament cash, then he set an expectation for some fair range of additional compensation. As I said above, reasonable minds can disagree about what is fair, but $2k of 1.2 million isn't even in the ballpark. Did Kuchar "screw him over?" Yeah, honestly I think he did.

2 hours ago, GolfLug said:

But he didn't! He gave him $2K. If MK really wanted to screw him over, he would have done just that. 

Fair point, but now we are just arguing the degree to which Kuchar was in the wrong. $1 clearly would have been a jerk move. What about $100? or $1,000? 

He didn't negotiate for flat rate caddie. He negotiated for $3,000 plus an unspecified percentage of his winnings. When the time came to determine the percentage, he cheaped out. I think the fact that he was willing to offer another $15k (over 7 times the original bonus amount!) when the caddie complained was telling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, Big C said:

He didn't negotiate for flat rate caddie. He negotiated for $3,000 plus an unspecified percentage of his winnings.

And he gave the guy a 67% bonus on top of the $3k.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

41 minutes ago, iacas said:

And he gave the guy a 67% bonus on top of the $3k.

Is it your contention that $2,000 was a fair bonus on his win? Or are you just playing devil's advocate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, Big C said:

Is it your contention that $2,000 was a fair bonus on his win? Or are you just playing devil's advocate?

My wife thinks it’s fair.

Let me ask you this: what do you think he contributed? Remember he can’t speak English even poorly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I for one am kind of shocked that the thread on this story has ballooned to nearly 6 pages. I'm impressed by the legs this story has. I'm sure MK would love the story to disappear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, iacas said:

My wife thinks it’s fair.

Let me ask you this: what do you think he contributed? Remember he can’t speak English even poorly.

And yet he won. Guess it goes to show the Tour caddies are way overpaid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Boy, he should have taken the additional $15k when offered....that offer is not coming back around....I clearly fall on the side of Kuchar here.

On a side note, I had the opportunity through a friend of a friend to help with the review a contract for a professional athlete that was negotiating without an agent -- the deal was that I was paid hourly and (of course) did not receive nor expect that I was entitled to any agent's commission in connection with the deal.  

And I just loved this line from Kuchar's interview...."It's not coming out of Steinberg's pocket"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mattkuchar.jpg

Matt Kuchar said he is “disappointed” and “sad” that his $5,000 payment of his Mexican caddie, David “El Tucan” Ortiz, after winning $1.3 million last November in the Mayakoba Golf Classic, has led to such hurt feelings...

Oof. This is a bad PR look. Some really bad lines in there, which aren't going to endear him to anybody:

Quote

Kuchar said he did not really understand why the pay dispute has turned into such an emotional issue. Told that a $5,000 caddie payment on a $1.3 million payday seemed frugal, he nodded, but indicated he had a different view.

“For a guy who makes $200 a day, a $5,000 week is a really big week,” he said.

The article also makes it clear that the extra $15k was after the original rumor started, and was an effort at damage control. I feel like this controversy will probably cost him more than $50,000 going forward, and the smart move may have been to just pay that.

Edited by DeadMan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I really don't understand why a guy who did nothing but schlep around a bag for a week should expect more of a lottery ticket than he got.  And I don't think he really did until people started whispering in his ear.  50 working days pay for a week of work would, in any other context, be considered quite generous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Somebody should have stepped up (sponsors) and paid this caddie just to save Matt's reputation.

No the caddie doesn't deserve more money but sometimes hush money is well spent.

 Hindsight ....Pay the caddie and milk the story for all the positive media attention you can get. 

In the future everything is wrote out in a contract with caddies.

Matt would have had to pay his reg caddie 130,000.00

Instead it would have been 50,000.00 for the sub caddie. (extortion fee) 

Hes still 80,000.00 better with the sub caddie instead of his reg caddie and maintains his great guy image.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, turtleback said:

I really don't understand why a guy who did nothing but schlep around a bag for a week should expect more of a lottery ticket than he got.  And I don't think he really did until people started whispering in his ear.  50 working days pay for a week of work would, in any other context, be considered quite generous.

I certainly see this point. But just entertain this thought; What would the outcome of this been had Kuchar, the multi-millionaire won the tournament and given the caddie $50k and said Gracias mi amigo. He would be a very popular guy in those parts. He would be hailed as one hell of a guy and Kuchar would be out $50k which in the world of Kuchar is literally peanuts. Everyone keeps minimizing the caddie’s role (he had a google translator he said he helped keep Kuchar calm) ... but none of us know what he did for Kuchar as a caddie it’s all speculation. A man who’s won $46M on the tour can spend 50k to make another human incredibly happy and help his family who at least played some role in his 1.2M pay out. It’s not like he needs to think, ‘great...now every time I travel and use a local caddie I’ll have to shell out 50k when I win.’ This was a unique occurrence and I don’t think Kuchar chunking 50k would have any negative affect. IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote

“I kind of think someone got in his ear,” Kuchar said. “I was very clear and very upfront on Tuesday [of the tournament week]. And he said, ‘OK.’ He had the ability, with bonuses, to make up to $4,000.”

Kuchar said he told Ortiz he would pay him $1,000 if he missed the cut, $2,000 if he made the cut, $3,000 if he had a top-20 and $4,000 if he had a top-10. “The extra $1,000 was, ‘Thank you — it was a great week.’ Those were the terms. He was in agreement with those terms. That’s where I struggle. I don’t know what happened. Someone must have said, `You need much more.’”

https://www.golf.com/news/2019/02/14/matt-kuchar-caddie-pay-controversy/

mattkuchar.jpg

Matt Kuchar said he is “disappointed” and “sad” that his $5,000 payment of his Mexican caddie, David “El Tucan” Ortiz, after winning $1.3 million last November in the Mayakoba Golf Classic, has led to such hurt feelings...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

33 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

I certainly see this point. But just entertain this thought; What would the outcome of this been had Kuchar, the multi-millionaire won the tournament and given the caddie $50k and said Gracias mi amigo. He would be a very popular guy in those parts. He would be hailed as one hell of a guy and Kuchar would be out $50k which in the world of Kuchar is literally peanuts. Everyone keeps minimizing the caddie’s role (he had a google translator he said he helped keep Kuchar calm) ... but none of us know what he did for Kuchar as a caddie it’s all speculation. A man who’s won $46M on the tour can spend 50k to make another human incredibly happy and help his family who at least played some role in his 1.2M pay out. It’s not like he needs to think, ‘great...now every time I travel and use a local caddie I’ll have to shell out 50k when I win.’ This was a unique occurrence and I don’t think Kuchar chunking 50k would have any negative affect. IMO.

If he pays this caddie 50k shouldn't he pay out that much to every local caddie he uses if he wins? Isn't it only fair?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Long-time lurker on the thread, but my thoughts have been:

Law of supply and demand. There were probably tons of guys who would've carried a PGA pro bag for a similar amount. The caddie hasn't made any case that he meaningfully contributed to the win by teaching Kuchar how the greens break, or maybe how certain shots play longer than they look due to prevailing winds, or whatever. What value did the guy bring that a bunch of others couldn't have?

A traveling caddie is 100% different. They invest themselves in the player's game, they commit to travel, and they likely do a ton more for their player due to the relationship than a local caddie. A standard (and higher) percentage of earnings is appropriate.

I don't really care if Kuchar made $1,000,000,000,000 or $100,000. It boils down to me to be: how many other guys could've and would've done the same task for the week? Probably tons. It's fair to pay people according to the value they bring- regardless of the purse that was won.

Kuchar can be charitable with his money in other ways to show what kind of a person he is. He likely has charitable causes that he contributes to. But don't measure how caring or uncaring he is based on this business relationship that is essentially driven by supply and demand.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Hi,  I'm a woman, 6' tall. It's all about swing speed, what feels good, and how well you can control it. Rogues are on sale right now and they're a good driver. I assume that's your reason for choosing them. The men's Callaway Rogue driver is 45.5". The women's is 44.5". But there really is no standard. It's all about what works best for you.  I play a Callaway Great Big Bertha Epic and cut the shaft to 44.5" for control. I use a "men's" R shaft because of my swing speed which is in the low mid-90s.  If yours is in the range of 80 - 95 you can use a Regular flex shaft. If it's in the 75 - 85 mph range you can use a men's light flex shaft (they don't call it senior anymore... lol because people don't want to feel old). Women's flex is for speeds below 75.  You'll find this out when you go on a launch monitor at the golf shop. You'll do this before you buy the club, right? Make sure you're fit for the club. Here's the deal, if the 45.5" is too long, you can always have the shaft "butt cut" 1". It will make the club feel lighter to swing but won't reduce the mass of the club head at all. You do not have to add lead tape to the club head and bring up the swing weight. But before you do that I'd wrap some electrical tape around the butt end of the grip about 1/8" thick with the bottom of that 1" down from the end of the grip. Then take it to the range, maybe play a practice round or two with it and see if you like that. If you liked it better longer, it's easy to remove the tape. 
    • This isn't poor etiquette. It's common sense. The only time this is an issue is if you strike when someone else finally decides to strike at that same moment after 30 practice swings. Then it's your fault for sure
    • Most golfers select a SW for the bunker conditions they face most often. Then, you can make adjustments for the odd course you play. If you normally have firm sand and play a course with soft sand, you can still get it out if you have good technique - you may not get it as close. It's about trade-offs. Not that many amateur players have a second SW with different bounce.
    • In high school I learned with the interlocking grip which was never comfortable for me.  Years later after reading Hogan I switched to the overlapping grip.  This took a year or two before I was comfortable, but still felt better for me. My hands are about the same size as "The Golden Bear's" which is average to small.   As I got older, I wasn't comfortable again so about 10-15 years ago I switched to the ten finger grip. Now in my mid-60's, this is very comfortable for me. Each change took a year or two before it felt natural.  Enjoy the progress of your adjustments.  There are other changes too as we get older, strengths, injuries, flexibility, aggressiveness, etc that require us to make modifications in how we play this great game. 
    • ??? A local high school coach who was once a 5 index golfer would say that. I hope that was some sort of typo or something.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Avanh
      Avanh
      (32 years old)
    2. DesertTime
      DesertTime
      (71 years old)
    3. Kersys
      Kersys
      (28 years old)
    4. takemoney
      takemoney
      (28 years old)
    5. trapdodger
      trapdodger
      (48 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...