Jump to content
Phil McGleno

Kuchar Pays Caddie $5k, Is Shamed, Pays $50k

244 posts / 17314 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

He would be hailed as one hell of a guy and Kuchar would be out $50k which in the world of Kuchar is literally peanuts. Everyone keeps minimizing the caddie’s role (he had a google translator he said he helped keep Kuchar calm) ... but none of us know what he did for Kuchar as a caddie it’s all speculation. A man who’s won $46M on the tour can spend 50k to make another human incredibly happy and help his family who at least played some role in his 1.2M pay out.

This type of logic is BS in my opinion. 

He's made 46 million over 15 seasons. Then you got to consider that he probably ends up losing a big chunk of it to taxes. Let's say he loses 40% of it to taxes. He's probably keeping 1.5 to 2.0 million a year in winnings.

Quote

Athletes file taxes not only in their home state but also in every state—and some cities—in which they play. Not every state uses the same calculation to determine what portion of an athlete's income to tax, and some use different calculations based on the sport

By looking at the PGA Tour Top 10 Finishes, Kuchar plays in about 20-23 events a year. So, after taxes he makes about 80-85K a tournament. At 3K a caddie, he's giving up 3-5% of his average winnings to the Caddie.

If you tell someone they can have 3-5% profit sharing, that is a pretty decent number. I would like 3-5% profit sharing of Apple stock. ;)

Basically you are asking that he gives up 60-65% of his after tax winnings per tournament to the caddie!

Let's say he gives away 50K per tournament, that would be giving away 1.1 million dollars over the course of one season.

Guess what, if he gives out 50K then all he gets asked about is, "What about the next guy?"

Yea, this is a big misconception on what Kuchar is actually paying someone. People just see big total numbers and don't break it down. It gets a bit better for Kuchar if you consider the other expenses of playing on the PGA Tour that I did not account for. That 3-5% can easily jump to 6-10% if he's a bit luxurious in his accommodations while traveling to these 20-24 events.

Let's take into account that this guy is being paid 136 dollars an hour to carry a bag (assuming a 5.5 hour round)

 

Edited by saevel25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

12 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

This type of logic is BS in my opinion. 

You’re going to argue that $50k is damage or a strain for Kuchar to pay? Look, Kuchar wasn’t wrong. I don’t think he deserves to be ridiculed as he carried out what he claims to have been the deal. But don’t tell me Kuchar can’t afford to throw a poor local 50k who caddied for him after winning $1.2M before taxes. There’s no argument to that. Period. Giving this caddie 50k is 100% unnecessary but don’t tell me the reason he didn’t was based on financial hardship. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hey Guys,

I don't want to be throwing fuel on this fire. But the amount Kuchar, or anyone really has made over their career should be inconsequential. 

When you enter ANY contract (have your roof repaired... I just did that, buy a car, lawn care service, what ever...) You do not enter that contract based on your lifetime earnings. Example, the kid that mows my lawn charges $125.00 per acre, I have 0.40 acres, therefore I pay him $50.00 to mow my lawn. Our negotiation of price never came down to my lifetime earnings. 

I'm not saying Kuchar was fair, I'm not saying he wasn't fair, I'm not saying he was cheap, I'm not saying he wasn't cheap.

All I'm saying is LIFETIME EARNINGS should play ZERO part in the discussion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

But don’t tell me Kuchar can’t afford to throw a poor local 50k who caddied for him after winning $1.2M before taxes. There’s no argument to that. Period. Giving this caddie 50k is 100% unnecessary but don’t tell me the reason he didn’t was based on financial hardship. 

So you are saying that Kuchar needs to give up 62% of his weekly average pay to his caddie? That is what you are advocating if you want Kuchar to give this guy 50K.

Because, the premise is, Kuchar should out of the kindness of his own heart, give the caddie 50K for 24 hours of work. Give the man 2,000 dollars an hour to carry a bag. Fine, that means his regular caddie should be paid more, right? His regular caddie does substantially more work than this guy would. He should be paid more. It also means that he should pay every local caddie that much. Because, the question asked of Kuchar would be, Why not that guy as well?

If that is the case, then Kuchar must pay over 50K per event for his caddies. Averaging 80-85K an event, he would be giving a substantial amount. That is why your logic does not work.It is a financial burden because of the outcome due to the spiral of guilt people will throw on Kuchar. Kuchar did a good thing by giving this man a good percentage of his average event winnings as payment. 

So no, these golfers do not need to subject themselves to the guilt trip that bleeding heart advocates try to impose on them.

This is why the handout mentality is a toxic one. It's a nice thing to do, but it begs the question, "Why not someone else". At some point it has to spot. Then at that point Kuchar is an asshole for not giving every caddie 50K. Might as well stop it at the first person, especially when the person is getting 136 dollars an hour to carry a bag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I'm not saying Kuchar was fair, I'm not saying he wasn't fair, I'm not saying he was cheap, I'm not saying he wasn't cheap.

All I'm saying is LIFETIME EARNINGS should play ZERO part in the discussion.  

I agree with this. But I am saying he wasn't fair if he agreed to give the caddie part of his winning check (not part of his after-tax, post expenses, average profit) and then gave him a tiny percentage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

o you are saying that Kuchar needs to give up 62% of his weekly average pay to his caddie? That is what you are advocating if you want Kuchar to give this guy 50K.

You’re way off the point I’m making. I’m talking about this one incident which is a very unique one. A local caddy from another country and Kuchar wins. 50k is nothing to Kuchar. We wouldn’t be having this conversation if he paid the caddie 50,40 or even 30k. Kuchars wealth has everything to do with this. 50k is pure peanuts to Kuchar...period. Stop arguing that. Kuchar will win more than that at his next tournament. For f**** sake I’m not saying he OWES the caddy that money ... it would’ve been a great gesture and would have zero affect financially to Kuchar. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, chspeed said:

But I am saying he wasn't fair if he agreed to give the caddie part of his winning check (not part of his after-tax, post expenses, average profit) and then gave him a tiny percentage.

Kuchar gave the caddie more money than they both originally agreed to.

You can argue that the amount the agreed to from the beginning might not have been fair for the caddie (I disagree) but there is absolutely nothing unfair about Kuchar paying the caddie the agreed upon amount, plus a little extra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, klineka said:

but there is absolutely nothing unfair about Kuchar paying the caddie the agreed upon amount, plus a little extra.

Completely agree. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Vinsk said:

50k is pure peanuts to Kuchar...period.

I am saying it is not.

How much money does Kuchar have in the bank right now? You have no clue. He could be the type of person who is living off of the winnings of tournament by tournament.

To him, 50K could be substantial. You are just claiming he has the resources because he happen to make that much over his career. That doesn't mean he has that much.

There are a lot of athletes that end up struggling the rest of their lives after they retire because they spent everything during their career.

You just see big numbers and say, "Oh he can afford that".

The guy got paid a substantial amount of money for 24 hours of work.

Fly me down to the next country Kuchar is going to play in. I'll take 3000 dollars to carry a bag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As far as I can tell, there was no actual number agreed for winning.  Just that there will be a "bonus".  Given the size of the winning, that bonus based on his winning comes off as MK being very cheap.  It's a huge PR nightmare.  I bet MK lost or will lose more than 50K in his endorsements going forward.

MK's attitude that $5K earning is a great week shows he is missing the point.  He comes off looking like Marie Antoinette.  That is just a callous and ignorant statement made by MK.  Basically he is justifying his action of being cheap.

Imagine what most people will say had someone like Tiger or Phil done this.  Of course from the stories I've read, Phil would never do something like that.  Although there are stories Tiger being cheap, but I don't know how accurate that is - this being the age of internet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

48 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

This type of logic is BS in my opinion. 

He's made 46 million over 15 seasons. Then you got to consider that he probably ends up losing a big chunk of it to taxes. Let's say he loses 40% of it to taxes. He's probably keeping 1.5 to 2.0 million a year in winnings.

By looking at the PGA Tour Top 10 Finishes, Kuchar plays in about 20-23 events a year. So, after taxes he makes about 80-85K a tournament. At 3K a caddie, he's giving up 3-5% of his average winnings to the Caddie.

If you tell someone they can have 3-5% profit sharing, that is a pretty decent number. I would like 3-5% profit sharing of Apple stock. ;)

Basically you are asking that he gives up 60-65% of his after tax winnings per tournament to the caddie!

Let's say he gives away 50K per tournament, that would be giving away 1.1 million dollars over the course of one season.

Guess what, if he gives out 50K then all he gets asked about is, "What about the next guy?"

Yea, this is a big misconception on what Kuchar is actually paying someone. People just see big total numbers and don't break it down. It gets a bit better for Kuchar if you consider the other expenses of playing on the PGA Tour that I did not account for. That 3-5% can easily jump to 6-10% if he's a bit luxurious in his accommodations while traveling to these 20-24 events.

Let's take into account that this guy is being paid 136 dollars an hour to carry a bag (assuming a 5.5 hour round)

This is poorly thought out. The tax situations of PGA Tour players are extremely complicated, and any percentage that taxes take out is a massive assumption. I don't even know how to begin to think of a number. Kuchar is going to be able to deduct a ton of stuff, including, what he pays his caddy.

The other problem is that you're ignoring sponsorship income. Kuchar has probably made more money with off course sponsorships than he has with on course winnings. He might get a bonus from his sponsors from winning.

A regular caddy, with a win, will get paid somewhere between 8-10% of the total winnings. That's not unprecedented at all. If his regular caddy had been on his bag, he would have had to pay that. Caddies don't get paid that much unless it's a win, either. I believe most get a flat salary and then a % of winnings that steps up based on the player's finish in an event. They don't get 10% per event.

The bottom line is that Kuchar has made enough money to easily be able to pay his caddy much more than the $5k he paid him. If he can't, I don't have any sympathy for him (I would be pretty shocked if he was living paycheck-to-paycheck, given that his career before golf was ... wait for it ... investment banker).

Whether he should have paid the caddy more than he did is a different question. But, come on, he's able to afford it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, Yukari said:

As far as I can tell, there was no actual number agreed for winning. 

The agreed upon amount for a top 10 was $4,000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, klineka said:

The agreed upon amount for a top 10 was $4,000

That was for top 10.  It is my understanding MK agreed to give a bonus for winning.  The amount of bonus for winning was not spelled out or not mentioned in any of the articles I've read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, klineka said:

Kuchar gave the caddie more money than they both originally agreed to.

You can argue that the amount the agreed to from the beginning might not have been fair for the caddie (I disagree) but there is absolutely nothing unfair about Kuchar paying the caddie the agreed upon amount, plus a little extra.

 

From Golf.com:

"Kuchar said he told Ortiz he would pay him $1,000 if he missed the cut, $2,000 if he made the cut, $3,000 if he had a top-20 and $4,000 if he had a top-10. “The extra $1,000 was, ‘Thank you — it was a great week.’ Those were the terms. He was in agreement with those terms. That’s where I struggle. I don’t know what happened. Someone must have said, ‘You need much more.’”

Yes, IMO - $5,000 for winning a tournament is cheap, no matter what the agreement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, Yukari said:

That was for top 10.  It is my understanding MK agreed to give a bonus for winning.  The amount of bonus for winning was not spelled out or not mentioned in any of the articles I've read.

See below in bold. At the beginning of the week the caddie agreed and knew that he could make up to $4,000.

Quote

“I was very clear and very upfront on Tuesday [of the tournament week]. And he said, ‘OK.’ He had the ability, with bonuses, to make up to $4,000.”

Kuchar said he told Ortiz he would pay him $1,000 if he missed the cut, $2,000 if he made the cut, $3,000 if he had a top-20 and $4,000 if he had a top-10. “The extra $1,000 was, ‘Thank you — it was a great week.’ Those were the terms. He was in agreement with those terms. That’s where I struggle. I don’t know what happened. Someone must have said, `You need much more.’”

 

1 minute ago, chspeed said:

Yes, IMO - $5,000 for winning a tournament is cheap, no matter what the agreement.

There's a difference between thinking that the amount that Kuchar paid the caddie is cheap vs. stating that what Kuchar did was unfair:

39 minutes ago, chspeed said:

But I am saying he wasn't fair if he agreed to give the caddie part of his winning check (not part of his after-tax, post expenses, average profit) and then gave him a tiny percentage.

Again, there's nothing unfair about Kuchar paying the caddie more than the amount they both agreed to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, klineka said:

See below in bold. At the beginning of the week the caddie agreed and knew that he could make up to $4,000.

 

There's a difference between thinking that the amount that Kuchar paid the caddie is cheap vs. stating that what Kuchar did was unfair:

Again, there's nothing unfair about Kuchar paying the caddie more than the amount they both agreed to.

That's where the story is unclear.  That's MK's version for his action.  You are quoting that as a fact to justify your position.

According to the caddie:

"Ortiz said that Kuchar said at the start of the tournament that he would be paid $3,000 for the week, plus an unspecified percentage of his winnings."

matt-kuchar-caddie-golf.jpg

David Ortiz, aka El Tucan, said the final payment offer from Kuchar’s camp was unacceptable. “I’m a little bit pissed, a little bit confused,” he said.

You have two different stories by two parties involved. 

IF the caddies version is anywhere near the truth or if the truth is somewhere in between, MK still comes off as cheap.

Edited by Yukari

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

But the amount Kuchar, or anyone really has made over their career should be inconsequential. 

This. 

I can't believe how blown up this whole thing is.  My first thought when I saw this thread a while back was "who cares?" Honestly is none of my business how much one makes or doesn't make, doesn't matter if he won or MC'd.  They had a contract, Kuchar fulfilled it's terms.  The caddy just wants more than what he signed on for, which makes sense, but it should not make Kuchar look bad at all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

55 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

How much money does Kuchar have in the bank right now? You have no clue. He could be the type of person who is living off of the winnings of tournament by tournament.

You know that’s very unlikely. His net worth in 2015 was $25 million. It’s not an unknown mystery as to what famous people’s worth is. Sure it may be off some...but come on...you’re being a little silly with that comment. 50k is peanuts to Kuchar and I’m done discussing that point. He owes the guy nothing more and he didn’t deserve the bad press he got. A little ribbing maybe, but that’s all. The caddy was a dope to decline $15k imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Okay, I know you are getting a whole pile of advice here. I'll throw one more thing at you. Consider doing the "5 minute per day practice challenge" on this forum.  For many people 5 minutes of practice daily can be as effective or possibly more effective than 1-1/2 hour practice sessions once a week.  I tried to do the 5 minutes a day practice challenge a while back, but I kept missing my weekend updates. It may be time for me to try again. 
    • I said 4-6, which is round dependent for sure. If my timing is on I can strike a lot of very solid feeling shots, but the clubs I use could be masking those off center hits with the forgiveness built into them. I can also mishit pretty horribly those same rounds. If I'm having a really bad round I'd probably struggle to hit 1-3, but I don't know that I go a full round without hitting at least one flush shot. Of course, I could be completely delusional too.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF Really my second full individual round(a stroke play event), or 4th if you count scrambles, on the year.  I am actually hitting my driver and irons decently as far as path and face is concerned and for distance as well.  My driver play is going especially well considering the lack of play.  I am definitely struggling a bit with low point but not as much as I thought I would. Had some great shots out of bunkers as well. I can't seem to figure out my wedge distances as is fairly obvious from this round.  My new Glide 2.0 wedges are confusing me a bit on some controlled distance shots.  I kind of miss my Edel wedges for that.  My touch around the greens is just not in form right now as would be expected.  I had some three putts out there but these greens are some of the toughest multi tiered greens I have played on.  We played with a scratch guy out there who shot a 77.  If i catch one thin or toe it a bit the hand also is in a fair amount of pain yet.  I look forward to the continued healing in the hand as far as that goes.   If i can avoid injuring myself this winter I hope to play a lot more next season.  Hopefully I can get out to Erin Hills and Sand Valley.  If anyone would be interested in playing theses courses next year with me, let me know. I am a bit on the fence over if I should work on the swing and try and get rid of the Furyk/Moore like loop or if I should just own it as it seems to be giving me the best face/path relationship I have maybe ever had.  At the end of the day if I can shoot in the low 80's from time to time next season I think it should be a lot of fun to play again.  
    • I’m typically around 4-6 if not even a bit higher. My issues come when I miss I miss big and start bringing big and crooked numbers into play
    • I don't know that that is accurate, and it definitely depends on the state.  In Colorado and California, for example, medical marijuana is exactly the same as the recreational strains available in dispensaries.  The difference is the level of taxation.  I did find one article that stated that 14 states limit THC potency, but after researching state-by-state wasn't able to pin that down.  I don't disagree that it's possible, but will argue the efficacy of doing so.  But to your point - Florida is considering legislation to limit the potency to 10% THC because levels above that "can induce psychosis in some users" (anyone seen Reefer Madness? 😄) A fools errand - the pot our parents smoked was around 7%, with the high-end "sinsemilla" coming in at around 9.5%.  It still gets you high.  Admittedly, the strains produced these days are much stronger, with 18-20% being considered high potency, and 30% being the upper limit for flower.  Extracts from marijuana plants, like hash oil, generally come in between 50 - 80%. To tie it all back together so I'm less off topic - regardless of the THC level, marijuana impairs a person mentally more so today than it did 20 years ago.  Golf is proven to have a significant mental component, aligned closely with the physical aspects of the game.  Thus weed absolutely has a negative impact on ones golf performance - though it might make a shitty round more fun.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AmirReza
      AmirReza
      (32 years old)
    2. BushwoodCC
      BushwoodCC
      (53 years old)
    3. cozelos
      cozelos
      (34 years old)
    4. RollingStoppie
      RollingStoppie
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...