Jump to content


Established Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

42 Moving Up the Leaderboard

About ColinL

  • Rank
    Well Established Member

Personal Information

  • Your Location

Your Golf Game

  • Handicap Index

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It's clear that the agenda behind this thread is too strong to make it worth the time trying to put up an argument to the contrary in the expectation it will be engaged with rather than bludgeoned. By the way you have misunderstood and misrepresented much of what I have said and so there's nothing more to be said.
  2. Yes, I think you may be missing something. There is more than one way of not knowing about penalty strokes you have incurred. There is ignorance of the rule (and that includes DJ's error) and there is knowing a rule but not realising that you have breached it eg by not noticing you touched sand with your backswing in a bunker, not noticing you accidentally moved your ball, not noticing that you had teed up in front of the markers. You cannot know what you have not seen. In such a situation it's right that the player cops the penalty for whatever it was, but not right that he should be furt
  3. A player of integrity who knows the rules but who breaches one without noticing has his attention drawn to it after he has put in his card. He immediately goes to the committee and reports that he has been advised that he had breached this rule but he had not noticed that he had . The penalty is added on to his score and he feels relieved that he did not inadvertently end up with a better score than he should have done. He has, in short, done the right thing, the honest thing. He has shown integrity. Is it just that he be penalised a further two strokes because other golfers migh
  4. I'm not seeing the advantage. If you breach a rule and know to take penalty you are 1 or 2 strokes worse off than if you hadn't breached it. If you breach a rule and don't know to take a penalty but it is later discovered and added to your score, you are the same 1 or 2 strokes worse off. The only two ways in which you can have an advantage is 1)if you breach a rule and no-one including yourself knows you have; and 2), if you are dishonest and knowingly don't take a penalty you know you have incurred. If I understand correctly, iacas wants the player who has the penalty for a later
  5. I just don't get the fuss about this particular rule. The game depends on the integrity of the player and the rules are based on the premise that players will proceed honestly. Why pick out one rule over all the others which can be bent, broken or manipulated by the dishonest?
  6. These are loaded questions designed to steer answers to a desired result. .
  7. Try it at my club and find out.
  8. My first paragraph was only intended to point out that it wouldn't normally be possible to stand in front of the player and simultaneously see the target and the player's stance. I missed the aspect of the question whereby if you are on the other side of the hole on the green you could see both target and player. Thanks for pointing that out. I see nothing that would prohibit the caddie standing there and guiding his player while he took his stance provided he moved away before his player made his stroke. Attending the flagstick is specifically excepted.
  9. The prohibition on standing behind the player while he takes his stance is to stop a caddie assisting in lining up his feet and body. That can only be done from behind. If the caddie stood in front and faced the player to line up his feet etc he wouldn't be able to see the target. If he faced the target he wouldn't be able to see his player. Off the green, anyone can stand on your line of play to point it out. The person must move away before the stroke is made, which means he can be there while the player takes his stance. [Rule 10.2b (1)] On the green, your caddie will be able to
  10. I had never heard the term "waste area" until meeting it on American forums. There weren't any on the links courses in Scotland I spent my early days of golfing on. Plenty of sand dunes though. 😀
  11. WIkipedia has got it wrong then. A bunker is just a bunker wherever it is situated and there is no such thing in the Rules as a "waste bunker".
  12. Thanks for the reference. I'm going to use this as part of a presentation to members on the new rules.
  13. I reckon if you were putting down a slope like that, the ball would bounce off the flagstick and continue to accelerate to a position a long, long way away. 😀
  14. Yes, it really has to be if the flagstick is at a considerable angle. I've certainly seen it happen that the flagstick has not been properly returned to its hole at the bottom of the cup and is leaning against the edge of the hole. That would mean a ball could be stopped against it without any of it even being over the hole never mind part of it being below the surface. Unusual though. But if in the end it is at all possible, the rule has to cover it. If you try the tap in with the flagstick in I don't suppose many people will say, "That's fine. It's covered in Rule 13.2." 😉
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...