Jump to content

verse214

Established Member
  • Content Count

    233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Sandbagger

About verse214

  • Rank
    Golfaholic
  • Birthday 11/30/1982

Your Golf Game

  • Handicap Index
    14.6
  • Handedness
    Righty
  1. So after reading all of your responses it's become apparent that the way you're using the word "freak" is as a simple substitute for the word "talent". So yes of course, all pro athletes have talent - And if the only reason why "freaks" had to practice was because they had to compete "with other freaks" - "normal" people like us would immediately recognize a "freak" when we saw one even if they didn't practice. Sorry, but i think your just confusing the word "freak" with "hard work and a little talent". And hard work and a little talent/luck is what makes people successful in ALL walks of l
  2. If they are truly "freaks" then they would not have to practice nearly as much as they do and wouldn't have had to play for the years that they did; of course there will be one offs who can perform at the highest level after several years of play. Plus if they were truly "freaks" each and every single one of them would be able to tell from the moment they picked up a golf club whether they can make it on the PGA Tour. In fact, golf is the ONLY sport where at the collegiate level you still have NO idea whether you will be able to play at the PGA Tour level. There is NOTHING freakish about this
  3. I think the above statement sumarizes what creates the 'misconception' about stack and tilt. The fact that there's a name for it makes people think that it's one formulated regiment of teaching that is the same for everyone and that creates a problem, especially in the eyes of teaching professionals, since everyone's swing and body type are different. I don't know the ins and outs of S&T;, but on the recent "Big 4" video with Harmon, Haney, McLean, and Leadbetter, the interviewer tried to get their opinion on S&T; and their conclusions was that each player has different problems in their sw
  4. Pros are not 'gods', nor are they 'freaks' - they are atheletes. If you have atheletic ability and have played in your youth-young adult years and have put in 10,000 hours of practice, you can become a top competing pro - maybe not pga tour pro, but a really friggin good golfer. To become that PGA tour pro, you just have to be able to make those shots under pressure and at that point it's all mental game. There is NOTHING freak like about these PGA tour pros. The majority of the people on this board have other things to tend to in life that prevent them from treating golf as their prima
  5. Els is not really a great example... people look at his swing and think that he's swinging so smoothly and that's why he's crushing it. sadly, the reason why he crushes it is because he's a beast... the guy is like 6'3" and 210 lbs and in shape.. he's not really a "model" pro that many of us should imitate... unless you're that big too. On the other hand, if you take a golf pro who is more of an average height - like Anthony Kim.. he's 5'11" (which is average height) and you see how explosive he has to be to be able to hit it long enough to keep up with the rest of the field... Comparing th
  6. I don't think it makes a difference whether the toe is straight up or on a parallel plane to your spine angle at that point in the back swing. There are players who may have the club a little more "shut" (or more parallel or even past parallel to the spine angle) and there are players who have it closer to toe up on the backswing. I think what is important is the final position at the top of the swing. The position at the top determines how much you have to use your body to rotate vs. your arms, etc. to get the club "square" at impact. Besides, I also think that someone who has a flatter
  7. With a SS of 120mph, optimal launch is 13* and optimal spin is 2400.. both of these should increase as SS increase. With an SS of 111 you should be dropping the launch angle to about 12.5-13 and lowering spin another 2-300 rpm's - most likely this isn't in the equipment but can be found in your set up. With your numbers that good I would focus on making solid contact while swinging at 111mph in order to get the smash factor up to about 1.48-1.49. Nice numbers tho!!! BTW: how do you like the FT TA? do you mind me asking what the actual loft is on the one you have and how do you like i
  8. People usually do have the reverse bounces on their wedges compared to what you have. What you can do is buy a stronger lofted wedge like a 52 in as low of a bounce as possible and then bend the loft to a 54... this will lower the bounce as well... get it?
  9. I don't believe that these were "samples". They were made available to Callaway staff members for purchase in 2009. Also, it's quite likely he did receive the club as a tip. The majority of all clubs sold on ebay are either taken from tour vans or received from caddies or players who don't need/use the clubs. It's also pretty easy to tell what's fake and what isn't. Just make sure you use credit card when buying on ebay so you can always charge back in case of fakes. I actually went back to that guy asking if he'd take something lower than his reserve to pick that club up.. it's going t
  10. Scratch will customize for you but not for anywhere near 100. For 100 u get their 8620 cast wedge and only get to pick grind, shaft, and loft. If you're willing to pay 350 for a wedge then they'll do some customization....
  11. I wouldn't say that Vokey's dominate the rest of the field. Technology has come a long way and the field has really leveled out, especially with wedges; I would say all of the major OEMs are about the same quality and it just comes down to preference and grinds...
  12. The FT-9 TA or TH (for tour hosel) is only 430cc's - it has REALLY low spin and it's not something that non-pro's should really be hitting; it would be difficult to get into the air with lower swing speeds. As stated above you could definitely get one on ebay - the reason why they're not selling like hot cakes anymore at $1000 is because Callaway is coming out with the FT Tour in March which will be the exact same thing as the FT-9 TH/TA except some weight will be moved around to increase the spin a little so that low handicap players will have an easier time getting the ball up in the air.
  13. Why don't you post a quick video of your swing. Most of the time, it's the swing and not the equipment. A few degrees of lie difference will not ruin your game no matter how you look at it and if you didn't notice it before, there's no reason to freak out about it now. Also, the individual who made the comment about Miz's: Mizuno irons are generally flatter than standard, not more upright. You usually have to bend 1* upright to meet the "standard" for american OEMs.
  14. If he's toe down at impact and if the fitter says he is 4* too flat ... it means he needs to go upright not flat
  15. Just a quick question: Are you SURE that you were fit correctly? How tall are you... a 4* change in lie is pretty drastic and it's possible that it's more of a needed swing change rather than an equipment change. Unless you're 6'3 or taller, I wouldn't take that fitting seriously. What kind of shot trajectory do you have now with your pings? Is Lie the only thing he recommended you customize, length maybe?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...