• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.

Jerry in DC

Member
  • Content count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Sandbagger

About Jerry in DC

  • Rank
    Newbie

Personal Information

  • Your Location
    Northern VA

Your Golf Game

  • Handicap Index
    23
  • Handedness
    Lefty

Recent Profile Visitors

248 profile views
  1. Blaming Strategy? Or Execution?

    There's an element of chicken/egg here, but what I'm curious about is - how bad does someone's execution (skill) have to be before we start calling it a strategy error? For example: if you know that for a 22 HI player that his slices/mishits/whatever will reduce distance by 20 yards on x% of approach shots, how big does x have to be before you club up by 1 or 2 clubs? I know you can do the math if you have enough data (which I don't have), but to generalize - could we say that a 22 handicap should go +1 club than his "stock distance"? This "seems" true to me, but I don't really know. Or the general LWS approach of advancing the ball as far as possible (I know it's more complicated) - how bad does expected execution have to be before a short iron lay up from 240 becomes the "right" strategic play? Maybe the data says that the 18 handicap is almost as likely to hit a terrible shot with a 9i as he is with a 3w and the risk / reward works out. That doesn't "seem" right to me just from seeing / playing a lot of bad golf, but I could be wrong...
  2. Practice wedges and short irons

    First let me say I'm all-in on LSW, long game over short game, full swing practice, etc. That's what I do. That's what I think people should do. I spend a fair amount of time at the range and like to look around and see what people are doing. I see a lot of really bad swings being made by people with drivers in hand. I don't know if those people are actively trying to get better or if they're just knocking some balls around. I do think they'd at least prefer to get better. I strongly suspect that those people would be far better served with a mid/short iron in their hands rather than a driver. Making swing improvements is difficult enough - trying to do it with a driver seems like an unnecessary challenge.
  3. Stubbornness on Short Game vs Long Game

    In addition to what others have said, there's something in sports coverage where people like to credit the non-obvious factors that don't appear to be related to natural talent. People who can smash drives and stick long approaches seems like natural talent. Grinding around the green is "grit" and "tenacity". Think about the words used to describe Z Johnson vs. D Johnson. "Gritty, bulldog mentality" vs. "so talented, physical gifts". People tend to praise the former more than the latter for whatever reason. Usually in sports a team / player wins because they're just better. More talented, more athletic, better players. But people almost never say that. Even Golden State, the most talented team ever assembled, you still hear about their "team mentality" and "lack of ego". Really they just have 4 top-25 players, which is nearly impossible in team sports, so they smash everyone. For whatever reason, writers tend to make sports into a referendum on character/personality vs. a test of talent/performance. Somehow people persist in thinking this is the "smart" take even though it's completely disproven with reams of data.
  4. I have to say that I'm very surprised by the number of positive reviews on this book, particularly by members of this site. First I'll say that I'm sure Harvey was a great guy and probably a really good instructor. But this book? There is nothing to it. It's got tons of outdated conventional wisdom that goes against most of the principles of TST/LSW. The modern writers (Erik, Broadie, etc) actually have real data on these things whereas folks in Harvey's day relied on feels and guesswork for things like course strategy, relative importance of the short game, and even swing mechanics. That's fine - Harvey was doing the best he could with the tools at his disposal, but we have better data, better tools, and frankly better books now. For 10 bucks and the hour it took me to scan through it, the book didn't cause me much harm. Some of the anecdotes and homespun style can be amusing. His tales of golf from 30's were interesting to me, as that's not a topic that gets a lot of coverage. But as a golf improvement book? I think it's almost a complete waste. "Take dead aim." Sure, but that's more of a bumper sticker than a book.
  5. My Swing (nevets88)

    Hi - I had some free time today and I read through a bunch of this thread to get some inspiration for my own improvement and to see what people are working on. I just wanted to say that you've made a ton of progress and your swing looks really good. It seems like you can be hard on yourself at times, which definitely has helped you improve, but I think you should also balance it out by appreciating your progress and enjoying how you can swing the club now. It's very impressive.
  6. Stubborn Steepness

    Thanks for the encouraging words. I definitely noticed things not functioning properly when I focus on something new, particularly when I'm limiting the practice to one section of the swing. Common examples for me while working on this move are 1) not shifting my weight properly (likely leading to chunks) and 2) for some reason leaning toward the ball (possibly causing the shanks). I will get this one figured out - then the thing I'm really curious about is how easily this new move will integrate into the full swing. [Hopefully easily, but I'm not counting on it...]
  7. Stubborn Steepness

    Great thread here - this is something that a lot of high cappers, myself included, likely have issues with. I've written down about 10 things to try next time I go to the range. I used to have the retracted trail elbow on the backswing that Erik demonstrated in the 5SK video. My eVolver instructor made that a priority for me last year, and I think I worked it out reasonably well. Since then I've been working to shallow out my swing and it's tough - my body just doesn't want to do these things... Based on this thread, I've realized that I think I'm keeping my lead arm too close to my body in the downswing (going straight down, as that dude in the twitter video said). I think for slicers, we want to keep everything away from the ball to stop coming OTT, but it can be the wrong thing to do sometimes. I had huge issues in my backswing because of this before I started lessons. I also really relate to the guys who have said that making contact from the proper A6 position is tough. I'm pretty coordinated, but it feels like an entirely new way of swinging. I'll shank a bunch of balls just starting from A6, which seems absurd to me. Just have to keep working though. Hopefully it's warm enough to hit the range tomorrow.