Jump to content

Southern by Choice

Member
  • Content Count

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

31 Plays from the Tips

About Southern by Choice

  • Rank
    Member

Personal Information

  • Your Location
    Coastal South Carolina

Your Golf Game

  • Handicap Index
    24.1
  • Handedness
    Righty

Recent Profile Visitors

678 profile views
  1. I’m President of a Women's Golf League and am planning our upcoming League Championship. I want to keep things fair while avoiding a 5-hour round. CAN WE SET A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STROKES PER HOLE AND STILL BE FAIR TO ALL PLAYERS? —There will be both NET and GROSS winners. —We currently set max strokes/hole at net double bogey for regular League play. —Our members can play to a maximum 38 course handicap. We have a handful of players with HI's in the 'teens; most are mid-to-high 20s, some are in the 30s, but there’s clearly a wide range of abilities. —The lower handicappers think net bogey max favors the HIGH handicappers, since they can pick up and record a score of 9 on a par 5...when they might actually have needed more strokes to actually hole out. I think it is painful and slow to have to hole everything out when a player is struggling with their 12th or 13th stroke...and it happens, of course. While this is a competitive league, we are also supposed to enjoy ourselves—something unlikely to happen after a 5-hour round in 95-degree weather. I believe the better players will win the gross rounds, and that picking up after net double bogey will not appreciably affect results for net winners. What say you?
  2. I’ve just reread some of the posts in this thread. It reminded me of an article I read when I first started playing six years ago, "HOW TO BREAK 100." One particular tip has stuck with me because it was funny and very accurate. "AIM FOR THE MIDDLE OF THE GREEN. YOU'RE NOT THAT GOOD!" So true! 🥴
  3. Mauricio, you are probably much better informed than I since you act as a RATER. (I tried taking the online course to become certified as a Course Rater but I couldn’t stick with it. Congratulations to you!) Our new tees are being added as part of the USGA and LPGA's "Play It Forward" initiative, instituted to be more in keeping with the drive yardage and swing speed of the "typical" female golfer. Pretty exciting stuff! It will give more opportunities for pars and birdies for women, senior women, junior players and new golfers. I’m looking forward to trying them out on occasion!
  4. I was looking up information about a temporary rating for a new set of tees that my club is adding. While doing so, I came across this info that seems to answer your situation, under Modification of Courses, Temporary Changes: "For differences under 100 yards (100 metres), no adjustment is necessary and scores can be submitted as usual" usga.org, Appendix G The PCC (Playing Conditions Calculation) you mention might pick up the changes, too.
  5. As a woman who came to golf late in life, I tried to speed up the learning curve by taking lessons—lots of them. I’ve probably taken a lesson or attended a workshop by eight different local pros. My husband corrected me; some girlfriends advised me. And then there is all the UNSOLICITED advice that men feel qualified to give to any female golfer! Regardless of the source, I had WAY too many thoughts in my head every time I stood over the ball. If there were four things I should be thinking about, I’d remember two—and it was never the same two! My club's new PGA pro TIM ASHLEY is from Arkansas, and he’s the best teacher I’ve ever had. Why? Before we started, I asked him to please watch four or five swings before he made any comments, since I don’t always do the same things twice in a row! And then I asked that he choose no more than TWO things I needed to correct, since I was unlikely to process/remember more than that. First up? I was standing too far from the ball. He showed me a simple way to get to the proper stance, regardless of the club. That was it. Immediate results! I worked on that for a couple weeks, then came back for Lesson #2, and tackled one or two issues, since I’d already "grooved" proper stance/ball distance and now had room in my cluttered brain to learn something new. I've dropped SEVEN strokes from my HI over five months, one step at a time. Not all lessons provided new information, of course, but the way it was presented resonated, and I changed things methodically, a bit at a time. I still forget something or slip into an old habit, but the catch-phrase or "feel" memory brings it back. SO HAPPY AND EXCITED TO BE PLAYING BETTER AND IMPROVING MY GAME!
  6. I read this quote aloud to my husband. He said, "Sounds like a nice guy. (Did I spell everything correctly?" Forty-four years, and he still makes me laugh! Not exactly a golf post, I know, but it was on my mind...
  7. My husband bought me a Jamie Sadock shirt for Valentine's Day. I thoroughly enjoyed it until I saw what those suckers cost! It hurts my frugal soul to pay that much for a golf shirt. Do you know how many golf balls you could buy for $89??!?
  8. I love it! I have a similar pair and they’re one of my faves. (I am of the female persuasion, though; does that make a difference?) 😉
  9. I just wanted to squawk a little bit! Digging into the details of the WHS is a bit like looking at legislation that has passed: sometimes it’s surprising what’s in there! i know of the exceptions to the rules, and it’s good that they exist for people who have real health issues or temporary setbacks, like the one you mention. (I’m a member of my club's Handicap Committee, and I’m glad we haven’t had a member who needed these exemptions—yet.) Thanks for your response. It’s nice to chat about a game I love so much with someone with your knowledge and experience.
  10. Fair question, for sure. I just looked it up, and even I'M impressed! I shot eight scores in the 90's within a one-month period—after not having broken 100 for nearly a year. Now I’m doing what everyone else has to do: scramble to actually play to the new lower handicap! Thank you for the kind words of encouragement. I still think it’s strange that the system "believes" you while your scores drop (ESR), but doesn’t "believe" you when the scores go up (Soft Cap and Hard Cap). Does that make sense?
  11. There must be a lot of sand baggers out there that the WHS was trying to "catch," but I’m a struggling golfer who has been caught in a system that only seems to hurt me. My HI was up to 38 early this year. I took a series of lessons and had a few very good rounds. BOOM! Exceptional, Score Reduction applied to not just THESE rounds, but to all of the previous revision scores. In my case, an ESR of -3. My index dropped like a rock, down to 24. I was excited, but that didn’t really represent my ability... I continued to play and my scores bumped up and down as I tried to find my new normal. As scores went up, the SOFT CAP was applied, reducing my index's upward movement by 50%. And the HARD CAP is also in place, so if I get in the doldrums again, my handicap index can never go higher than +5 from my previous 12-month low! My good friend has been on a similar journey of rapid improvement followed by inconsistent scores. We are playing in a tournament together on Monday, and neither of us believes our current HI is realistically representative of our expected ability. Again I ask—are there that many cheaters out there, that so many restrictions were built into the WHS?
  12. Flying Ace: Our club will very occasionally turn a blind eye to fivesomes when things are VERY slow. I can’t image you following a group that size as a single unless you are often invited to play through. Do you specifically ask to play alone when you book? I’m perfectly happy to be paired up with someone else when I book a solo tee time; I just don’t want to go to the trouble to find playing partners myself!
  13. I’ve posted before about playing alone, and I, too enjoy it. I’m a high-handicapper, but I play quickly; five-hour rounds kill me, too! Members of my women's league (mostly indexes of low-20s to mid-30s) pride ourselves on being ready to play, walking quickly to the ball, searching for a minute—not 3—for lost balls, etc. "If it’s not immediately visible, it’s probably not playable. Take the penalty and move on!" So give the higher-handicappers a chance as playing partners: you might be pleasantly surprised! BTW, I can’t imagine that you’ve NEVER been asked to join another group. When I play with my husband or another couple of friends, we ALWAYS invite the singles to join us. Of course, some prefer to play alone, and that’s okay, too.
  14. Excellent steak house analogy, mcanadiens! Sometimes it’s not just about the "steak"—or the golf—but about the entire experience. I admit to being fascinated by how long this discussion has gone on with a group of guys...about what is basically a fashion issue! (I know, I know—that wasn’t the initial point of the thread, but that’s where it’s gone.) Very evolved. 😉
  15. "Besides, you should consider "golf clothes" a uniform. The same uniform you would wear in any other sport." I hadn’t thought about it this way, but it makes a lot of sense: dressing appropriately for golf IS like a uniform. No one would tell the coach of the football or baseball team that they didn’t want to wear the uniform. The only difference that comes immediately to mind is that those are team sports... And BTW, women golfers follow clothing standards, just as the men do.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...