Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'spoilers'.
Found 1 result
So, the wife and I just watched episode 1. I've read a bit about it, and basically… I don't think I'm going to go along with the story they're going to try to tell. You have a guy with an IQ of 70. Who lit a cat on fire. Who may or may not have screwed his wife on his front lawn. Who ran a woman off the road and threatened her with a gun. Who stole (stupid stuff) from a store. You have a victim who IDed him. You have a sketch artist who says he did not see the picture. You have a guy convicted by a jury of his peers, and an AG who found no wrong-doing in the incorrect original conviction. From what I've read this whole thing is setting me up to make the case that he didn't kill the woman coming up here in the next episode or something, too, but I'm still leaning heavily toward "he probably did." I'm not inclined to take the almost one-sided story quite so readily as they seem to want me to take it. I'm not going to spend a lot of time reading conspiracy theories, but from what I've seen in glances, people are falling in line with that way of thinking: the "they done screwed him AGAIN" line of thinking.