The U.S. Open is notorious for its idea of par as a standard. The courses that host the tournament are usually set up to be quite penal. “Par is a good score” you’ll hear pros say, and this year’s event at Oakmont Country Club outside of Pittsburgh, PA is looking no different.
The typical U.S. Open course has pinched fairways, long holes, super-fast, super-firm undulating greens, and the nastiest, thickest, juiciest rough you’ll ever want to see.
And yet the U.S. Open typically plays to about even par, and is actually trending lower. Let’s have a look.
The Trend
Over time, the occasional flukes (like Tiger Woods’ 2000 performance at Pebble Beach) are averaged out by the, well, average. If we plot all U.S. Open scores from 1945 to 2006 with a trend line, we notice one fairly important thing: the average score in relation to par is going down:
Wow. I’ll bet that’s not what you were expecting, was it? Here’s the hard data:
Year Score To Par ---- ----- ------ 2006 285 +5 2005 280 E 2004 276 -4 2003 272 -8 2002 277 -3 2001 276 -4 2000 272 -12 1999 279 -1 1998 280 E 1997 276 -4 1996 278 -2 1995 280 E 1994 279 -5 1993 272 -8 1992 285 -3 1991 282 -6 1990 280 -8 1989 278 -2 1988 278 -6 1987 277 -3 1986 279 -1 1985 279 -1 1984 276 -4 1983 280 -4 1982 282 -6 1981 273 -7 1980 272 -8 1979 284 E 1978 285 +1 1977 278 -2 1976 287 +3 1975 277 -3 1974 287 +7 1973 279 -5 1972 290 +2 1971 280 E 1970 281 -7 1969 281 +1 1968 275 -5 1967 275 -5 1966 278 -2 1965 282 +2 1964 278 -2 1963 293 +9 1962 283 -1 1961 281 +1 1960 280 -4 1959 282 +2 1958 283 +3 1957 282 +2 1956 281 +1 1955 287 +7 1954 284 +4 1953 283 -5 1952 281 +1 1951 287 +7 1950 287 +7 1949 286 +2 1948 276 -8 1947 282 -2 1946 284 -4
The trend line predicts a final score at this year’s U.S. Open of -4.5. Sports bettors take note: that should be your true over/under number from a statistical analysis. Of course, sports betting doesn’t work that way, and the last time I checked, the over/under was about +3.
The trend line, it should be noted, is just that: a line. If the USGA has changed their policy, say, since 2000, it would be far too early to notice a shift. After all, there are 55 years of scores on one side of 2000 and only six points on the other side. Tiger’s 15-shot victory at Pebble Beach may serve to flatten the trend line over time, but it likely won’t have much effect while Tiger is still playing the game.
The Play
Also obtained from all of these numbers was the average score for a U.S. Open win since 1946. Looking at the graph above, I would have never guessed the average: -1.6. Rounding up (or is it down?), we can say two under par is the average winning score for a U.S. Open since 1945. If the USGA’s intent is to play a golf tournament at about even par, they’ve done a pretty good job.
I also took a look at the winning score mode. The mode – the most common number in a data set – is not always the best statistic, but sometimes it can be revealing. The most common, popular, or prevalent score in winning a U.S. Open since 1945 is four under par (-4), or one under par per round over four rounds of golf.
The Conclusion
I like the idea of playing courses with the hardest conditions possible for the major championships. It really separates the boys from the men. For all of us amateurs, par is what we strive for, and it’s nice to see the pros do the same once in awhile. It’s nice to see the pros struggle from the rough when they miss the fairway like we do. It’s a nice change of pace to see all the scores very close to par.
Since 1945, the average score has been -1.6. Since 2000, it’s actually been a bit lower: -2.3. Will Oakmont serve, as Winged Foot did last year, in pushing the average a teeny bit higher, or will it relent and yield a sub-par total? We’ll have to wait and see.
As an Introduction
Thank you for read this week’s The Numbers Game. My name is Harry Solomon, and I am a new staff member here at The Sand Trap. I’m taking the reigns from Dave Koster, which is a scary endeavor. Even with my size 13s, I have big shoes to fill.
I encourage you to get in touch with me if you have ideas you’d like to see explored in future editions of TNG. Or, as always, post a comment below. I’d love to hear from you.
This article was written by guest author Harry Solomon, an active member of our forum.
That’s interesting stuff. I would never have guessed that last year was the first since 1978 for an over-par winner.
The course rating at Oakmont is 78.3, which I would think is higher than most US Opens, but I haven’t checked. I’d guess the USGA would be happy with a score anywhere from par to +5 or +6. I just hope they haven’t made it too difficult, with the guys struggling to have a decent round.
Great article, Harry. Have you thought of grouping the numbers for specific courses and seeing what the trend is there?
It’s difficult to compare apples to apples even this way, since they redesign the courses for the opens, but it could be revealing. I’ve done some similar looking at Masters scoring, which is a better study given that the course was relatively unchanged for several years.
nice article, go VJ!
No I haven’t looked at that yet. I’m going to take a quick look to see if it would be possible. Usually for any group of data under 8 data points its not very reliable and with Oakmont having it the most at 8 this year, I do not think it will yield any good results.
You got it dead on right regarding a +5 and +6 US Open finish. Oakmont is the closest Golf Course in America to Saint Andrews. Everyone would have prefer that Tiger Woods would join Ben Hogan, Jack Nicklaus and Johnny Miller, but that is the breaks.
In 2016, the US Open returns to Oakmont, Tiger will have another chance to play and win on the Toughest Course in America, bar none! 😛