Thanks for the reply, Pharaoh.
I don't want to belabor a point, but what does it mean that it was "based" on Byron Nelson's swing? Did Byron Nelson swing in a perfect circle and was he on the exact same plane everytime? Of course not, this is a machine not a person. Even if it did look like a person, it would not swing like one. If I wanted to build a machine to hit golf balls the same every time I would not even look at a human swing because of the inherent inconsistancies. No matter how you, Wilson, or the originator want to romanticize it the machine has nothing to do with any one person's swing.
My point in this blog is to point out the inanities in this type of golf "instruction"nothing more.
I am curious, thought, you claim to be a "0.0" handicap (I guess that is the same as "0"), why would anyone with your level of ability, if you are telling the truth, be involved with trying to learn swing mechanics from someone who ostensibly can't play any better than you?
If you're that good, why not hire a coach, or just practice your short game?