Jump to content

angel

Member
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About angel

Your Golf Game

  • Index: ninguno

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

angel's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/9)

  • 1st Post

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks, Iacas, for your post. Just point that i didn't say reacting but over-acting. Anyway, i say all this seeing the subject from a great distance. In that sense, i can't see any s&t; instructor leting a student get his weight too far forward. I don't know what is "behind the scene", and how the "hierarchies" (as you said, and language is never neutral) govern their enterprise, but what i see is some clever people sharing good information. Maybe at the highest levels of that hierarchy they are not that open minded, but overall picture looks like people that want to learn and change ideas, just like you.
  2. You're right, cipher, i'm not saying you shouldn't show that fine results of your inquiry, just that i don't see them as a great change in the system, and for my taste isn't so fair to present the s&t; camp as not being open-minded.
  3. Hi, guys. Just how i see all this things. I think you are somehow overacting. Yes you're right and they're wrong in all that stuff. They could be over-emphasicing the importance of having the weight forward. But, in S&T;, just like in 5SK, there isn't just an isolated principle, they are relative to others, in a system. And, acording to S&T;, you want your weight forward, but you also want your head still. There are S&T; spectrums everywhere (see the book) where they show a player with too much weight on the left and with his head falling to the target. Obviously, you can see a big "no" under that player. So it is not: "stack and tilt is wrong" but "stack and tilt had some wrong data that a player on his own could missunderstand". Just like any mid handicap could get wrong any system working on his own. In the end, i see same principles with some variations. And again, i think you're overacting trying to find your own place, and forcing a public break between the two camps.
  4. Anyway, also known as, "killing the father".
  5. Thanks for the reply. And talking about cp vs cf, it´s Moradish stuff, just a description based on centripetal or centrifugal forces. You could check a great descrition by Iacas here (among other great information), http://thesandtrap.com/t/44307/hitting-up-or-down-with-the-driver-in-an-inline-pattern . But, basically, and by now, you could think on your movement in the release, that has really gone from "out and to the target" to "around your body". Theoretically, this tipe of motion should leave a lower ball flight, and there came my question. Thanks again.
  6. Hi, Liam. First of all, that´s a great swing, no doubt about this. Just wanted to ask a couple of questions. Have you noticed a loss of height or distance switching to a more "inline" or even "cp" release protocol? Is it purposely that you set up with your right knee more extended that left? I really need to do the same to feel comfortable in my set up, don´t know why. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...