This thread will hit 400 pages (not posts, pages) soon. It asked one "either/or" question. I predict the posts will dramatically slow down as Tiger gets more wins. The only thing keeping it going are the 18/14, then 18/15 guys. It's pretty silly that these guys are so number dependent that even probably 18/17 (and if Tiger were to have no other wins but majors during that time to get to 17, he'd be at 83 total wins). And with 17 Majors, 83 wins, and they'd still only be about number of majors.
And overnight they'll disappear if it becomes 18/18. Then somehow one player who wasn't the GOAT at 3pm that 18th major Sunday, is 3 hours later unquestionably the GOAT at 6pm? The player is the same. The question isn't "Who won more majors?". The question is who is the greatest -- and that is in essence a question that considers ALL factors -- who they played against, whether the player they were playing against choked it away the last few holes (Isao Aoki 1980 US Open), quality of their other wins, amateur careers -- the best assessment is to take everything into account.
It's the drones who parrot 18/15 like stats and can't think with a bit more nuance (about golf and everything else in life) that make this world a worse place.