MP-32 v. MP-67's

[wigget]

Has anyone had the opportunity to hit both of these irons? I've demoed the 32's and they're absolutely great clubs. Was just wondering what the main performance difference is b/w the two. Thanks...

[YoungTom]

The 67's seemed to have a lower ball flight for me, and a much more blade like appearance at address. I never really thought of the MP-32's as a true blade. They felt like much more of a players cavity. Higher ball flight, and relatively wider sole.

The 67's have less offset (although your eye may not be able to tell), and the soles of the two are also very different, the 67's far more prone to digging than the 32's.

One big thing I really like about the 67's is the PW is a far better shape, it's one of the first Mizuno blades to have a good looking PW. Others have looked very odd to my eye for some reason.

[Young04]

  wigget said:

Has anyone had the opportunity to hit both of these irons? I've demoed the 32's and they're absolutely great clubs. Was just wondering what the main performance difference is b/w the two. Thanks...

you're a lower handicap than i am, but i'll put in my observations for what it's worth. i recently picked up a set of MP60's and love them (for my handicap, i'm a good iron player). in the process, i did hit the MP32 and 67 (and 33 as well), though i wasn't planning on purchasing it. i will second that the 67 is more of a blade than the 32, particularly in the long irons. trajectory was lower in the 67s. i did notice that the 32s were a tad less forgiving than the 60's. by the same token, i thought the 67s were a tad less forgiving than the 32's.

[wigget]

Thanks for the info guys...