Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Dreams Die Hard...these guys are good!


Note: This thread is 4795 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

What do the following players have in common?

T20 expand Colin Biles Columbus, OH -11 F -5 66 72 72 67 277
T20 expand Daniel Stone St. Petersburg, FL -11 F -2 71 67 69 70 277
T20 expand Santiago Rivas Windermere, FL -11 F -1 70 68 68 71 277
T20 expand Brad Schneider Valrico, FL -11 F -1 69 68 69 71 277

T21

expand Matthew Hoffenberg Simi Valley, CA -4 F -5 71 76 70 67 284
T21 expand Andrew Gunson Irvine, CA -4 F +1 72 73 66 73 284

T22 expand Joseph Wheeler Bethany, OK -3 F E 73 69 71 72 285
T22 expand Mitch Hendon Arlington, TX -3 F -1 74 73 67 71 285
T22 expand Cameron Edens Phoenix, AZ -3 F +1 68 77 67 73 285
T22 expand Xinjun Zhang China -3 F +1 72 72 68 73 285

T25 expand Ryan Fox New Zealand -3 F -1 71 72 71 71 285
T25 expand Scott Gordon Fair Oaks, CA -3 F -1 71 72 71 71 285
T25 expand Matt Marshall Marana, AZ -3 F * -5 74 70 74 67 285
T25 expand Dustin White Pueblo West, CO -3 F E 70 71 72 72 285
T25 expand Steve Ziegler Westminster, CO -3 F +2 67 75 69 74 285
T25 expand Kyle Kallan Peoria, AZ -3 F +2 71 70 70 74

285

T19 expand Josh Habig San Diego, CA -2 F -1 68 70 71 69 278
T19 expand David Denham Athens, GA -2 F +3 68 69 68 73 278
T19 expand Andrew Roque Monterey Park, CA -2 F +3 65 75 65 73 278
T19 expand Nick Mason Denver, CO -2 F +4 71 67 66 74 278
T19 expand Brent Witcher Atlanta, GA -2 F +5 69 67 67 75 278

T21 expand Cam Burke Canada -4 F -4 70 71 72 67 280
T21 expand Gordon Strother St. Simons Island, GA -4 F -2 69 72 70 69 280
T21 expand Clint Jensen Jupiter, FL -4 F -1 68 70 72 70 280
T21 expand Mackenzie Hughes Canada -4 F E 69 69 71 71 280

They all played under par golf for 72 holes and failed to advance past Stage 1 of Q School by a single shot!

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Posted

That's true, scoring is tough at Q-school.

But, as a general rule, shooting 2-under par (and sometimes just 70) every round will get you thru every stage at Q-school.

This, historically has held true with one exception, where Harrison Frazier won final stage after shooting 59 in one round.  That year everyone took it WAY DEEP.

Over the past 2-3 years, Q-school has seen even lower scores, sometimes needing 1-69 for every 2-70's to make it through.

Comparatively, these are the scores you need to keep your card as well.

Liam Friedman
PGA Assistant Golf Professional
Trying to make the TOUR
Contestant on Big Break: Greenbrier


Note: This thread is 4795 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.