Jump to content

cutshot878

Established Member
  • Posts

    110
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About cutshot878

Personal Information

  • Your Location
    Spring Hill, FL

Your Golf Game

  • Index: 6
  • Plays: Righty

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

cutshot878's Achievements

Established Member

Established Member (3/9)

  • 1st Topic
  • 72nd Topic Rare
  • 1st Reaction Given
  • 1st Reaction Received
  • 1st Post

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. cutshot878

    cutshot878

  2. 350 yard drives. 200 yard 9 iron shots. The modern game. Love it or hate it. Perhaps restrict the loft on the driver to 15 degrees. A 3 wood can only go so far, maybe 320 max. Time to reign the ridiculousness in a little bit. Or not.
  3. There could be some truth to this statement. My uncle, who didn't learn the game as a child, and who never became an obsessive golfer, often tells me that he's looking at the ball at address. Focusing on the exact dimple or portion of the ball that he wants to strike. Maybe he got this tip from Nicklaus' Golf My Way or from another golfer. He seems to think that hitting the ball is all about impact (which of course it is ultimately) and if he just strikes the clubface on the right part of the ball then he will hit a straight, solid shot. For me it's more about making a good swing. The ball doesn't exist. I just make a swing. If I look at anything I look at the clubface. Once I feel like I'm lined up to the target correctly, I'm not one of those players who constantly looks toward the target, constantly turning my neck and head toward the target. I don't need to. I'm thinking about good shots that I've hit on this hole in the past. I'm trying to reproduce that shot that I have a very vivid picture of in my mind. Also, while looking down at my clubface I usually have 1 or 2 swing thoughts: Usually a backswing thought and a downswing thought. I used to go to The Players Championship every year. What I got most from watching the pros was that they looked like they were just making a practice swing when they swung at the ball. Like the ball wasn't there, it was merely along the arc of their swing. I only ever saw them swing hard when they were on the tee on a Par 5 or long Par 4. I think this influenced me to ignore the ball. If I make a good swing the ball will be struck.
  4. Yes, I know, I'm posting to a very old thread. Couldn't find anything current on this topic. I can relate to the "hitting" feels vs the "swinging" feels. As a child, I played baseball before I played golf. As a right handed player, everything was done "actively" with the right arm and hand while the lower body and left arm and hand "felt" passively involved. I could throw a curve ball before I first held a golf club in my hands (at the age of 11) and tried to hit something that was much smaller than a baseball and was on the ground. So for most of my junior years as a golfer I "felt" like I was making a baseball swing at the ball. My right hand and arm were "active" in takeaway, backswing and downswing. I had no concept or "feel" of using the left side and definitely never tried to "actively" pivot and clear my left hip while keeping my arms and hands passive and "along for the ride." I managed to shoot even par a couple of times (during tournament play) as a high school golfer and could break 80 at least once per week. But I didn't "feel" like a good golfer because I was inconsistent. And I had no intellectual understanding of basic golf fundamentals and I didn't understand why I hit duck hooks off the tee 30% of the time and overcooked a lot of my shots in general. I didn't know that I could weaken my grip or make other modifications to set up that could modify my ball flight in emergency situations like water hazards or O.B. to the left or right. I had only one shot: a draw that more often than not turned into a big hook. I had never tried to "swing" a golf club with the left arm "feel" during the backswing and then a transition and downswing "feel" like I was using an active lower body hip-clearing pivot (with passive feeling arms and hands) to shallow out the club and get the club on plane (in the slot) before impact. Later in life, in my late 30's and early 40's, when I had more time to work on my game, I experimented with "swinging" and more "active" left-sided feels. Keeping the right side passive felt weird and took a lot of practice (3 years) to ingrain, but eventually I could break 80 with this method as well and could hit a reliable fade or push fade when needed. I finally had a shot I could hit off the tee on those dogleg rights and I could "cut the corner." My left sided swing was very loopy. Very Jim Furyk, Ryan Moore. Lots of people said "nice shot" during this phase of my golfing development but nobody ever said "nice swing." Having hit a dead end in my game recently and feeling pretty lost (never quite being able to feel like I'm swinging with my left side while keeping my right side passive) I've returned to the "feels" of my junior golf days. I feel like I'm trying to hit (active use of right arm, wrist and hand) a baseball that's on the ground again. Much flatter swing. No loop. Less angular variation between backswing and downswing. I bend over a little more at address. The backswing feels flatter. And on the downswing I don't just "feel" like I'm firing the lower body and allowing the arms and hands to get a free ride. I "feel" like I'm "hitting" the ball with my right hand. Like I wish I had 3 right hands. I focus on preventing my head from moving past the ball. I "feel" like my lower body is static. Of course, it is anything but. "Swing left" or "hit left" is a dominant feel. So far so good. Not crazy about the more bent over posture but happy to be able to use a slightly stronger left hand grip than I was using with the more "left sided" feel swing. I guess everybody's "swing feels" and "swing thoughts" are unique. Like fingerprints.
  5. Pretty funky at the top but I love his finish. I could honestly watch this swing all day. When you cross the line at the top, does it mean that you have to have a lot more lateral lower body movement (on the downswing) to avoid coming over the top? Is that what's happening here and allowing him to find the slot like a PGA Tour pro? If he just rotated without lateral he'd be over-the-top? Why doesn't he look as Hip Bumpy as say Tom Lehman? He rotates more?
  6. I've been attempting to make a swing in which my backswing is less upright and steep and a closer match to my downswing so that I don't have to be as athletic (as Fred Couples, Bubba, Furyk, and Ryan Moore who have large angular differences (loopiness) between backswing and through swing and have great rhythm and timing). Is it true that flaring my right foot at address will not help me in this regard and will lead to too much of a weight shift onto the right foot at the completion of the backswing? This is one of the recommendations in Jim Hardy's somewhat antiquated (10 years old?) book. He recommends only flaring the lead foot in the "one-plane swing" as he calls it. The flat swing requires more upper torso movement while the lower body stays more static? To flare the rear foot or not to flare the rear foot? That is the question. I guess it depends on what you're using as your dominant engine to power the swing? And other characteristics?
  7. Just got his "The Plane Truth" book a few days ago. I guess it's kind of an older book. So far the book hasn't been as enlightening as I had hoped. Some interesting ideas. Especially the ones about how you should have a different type of grip, set up, spine angle. weight shift, foot flare, method of initiating the downswing, etc. depending on which type of swing you have. While I do agree that a more one-plane swing is theoretically more repeatable (less compensations to get the club from upright backswing to more shallow downswing, less loopiness) I do have some doubts. For starters, he says that you have to be more athletic and flexible to be a one-planer. But isn't that the whole point of the more one-plane swing? That you don't have to be so athletic and dependent upon timing? Isn't that why Matt Kuchar went to a more one-plane swing? So he wouldn't have to depend on his athleticism? Which declines with age. Also, Hardy says that with the one-plane swing the downswing is not initiated with the lower body, but rather with the upper torso. As a lifetime two-planer I can't really imagine what this would be like to initially keep my lower body static. Seems like I would just not have any power and would be attempting to hit from the top and come in too steep and OTT. But I guess it makes sense. You wouldn't need to use your hip rotation to shallow out the club if you're already very flat and shallow. I guess it would feel more like hitting a baseball to a two-planer? I'm guessing it would feel like you're hitting it more with your right hand? Making you wish you had 3 right hands? Looking forward to reading the book further.
  8. Fundamentally it makes sense. I flare both feet and I feel it allows me to swing like a younger man. More around my body.
  9. Probably going to go out next week and watch Web.com 2nd Stage Q-School at Southern Hills Plantation in Brooksville, Florida. I went two years ago and I enjoyed it and learned more in this quiet setting (watching the pros) than in some of the PGA Tour stops I've been to. Watching these guys quietly going about their business without all the hoopla and crowds. They'll be playing it down on dormant bermuda fairways. Very tight lies. Not sure if the rye grass has come up yet on the greens.
  10. I guess nobody has a shag bag anymore? All the mini tour (Florida Space Coast Tour) players I used to watch practicing in the early 1980's had their own leather shag bags. You could find them at the back of the driving range on any given Sunday afternoon hitting shot after shot until dark. I don't think they thought they were "wasting time."
  11. I guess the title of this thread is not accurate. It should read, "Advantages/Disadvantages of the Sam Snead/Nicklaus Head/Chin Swivel at set up/address. (Before the takeaway and backswing)
  12. 1. Does this movement cause you to take the club back more inside? (for me, that's a good thing when I'm trying to draw the ball, as my swing tends to be too "out-to-in" like Ryan Moore or Jim Furyk.) 2. Because your head/chin already swivels to the right when you've completed your backswing, is this step even necessary? 3. If you're trying to hit a fade and have made set up changes (playing the ball more forward, aiming left, and in some cases even slightly opening the face) does swiveling your head/chin to the right before you begin the takeaway make it harder to "fade" the ball? 4. Will a player who utilizes a "right forearm takeaway" feel instead of a "one-piece takeaway" feel benefit from this classic Sam Snead/Jack Nicklaus move of tilting the chin/head to the right at set up? 5. Although tilting your head/chin to the right at address seems to make it easier to keep the head "behind" the ball prior to impact, does it inhibit in any way your pivoting, left hip clearing movement to power the swing?
  13. "These marquee players are especially good."
  14. I Let me try to clarify: We have a lot of pine trees that line the fairways here in Florida (pretty much everywhere in the South). Fairways cut out of very thick pine woods---think Augusta or TPC Stadium Course. The push draw off the tee doesn't always draw (even for players on these developmental tours like E-Golf and Web.com) and then you're left with the push in the right rough. When you're drive is on the right side of the fairway with overhanging tree limbs blocking your "stock 5 yard draw" approach you kind of have to cut it. I recently attended a 2nd stage Q-school event and I found the shots they hit to have quite a bit of movement....mostly left. I saw a lot of draws with 20 yards of movement. There was about a 15mph-20mph wind out there and it was actually a pretty open course. You must be talking about completely windless conditions. For the ball to move only 5 yards on a 200 yard iron shot, I'd say that's dead calm wind conditions, or maybe downwind, unless you're holding your push draw against a left to right breeze which I suppose could account for a shot that's virtually straight. Obviously wedges are going to go pretty straight. I'm thinking of shots in the 175-300 yard range. 5 yards of movement on a 300 yard drive is common on the web.com tour? Really? Is this at the indoor golf course in Dubai? Bubba Watson works the ball a lot. So does Ricky Fowler. I guess they're the super elite 5% who are so good that they don't have to just hit their stock shot (comfort zone) every time.
  15. Thanks for answering my questions, Mike. It would be interesting to see if Matt could play a fairly tight course like Harbor Town (lots of overhanging tree limbs and tree lined fairways) by just hitting his stock 5 yard push draw (really just a straight shot) all day long. Maybe on these desert courses the player isn't as obstructed (on approach shots from the first cut or rough) by overhanging tree limbs and there's no incentive to work the ball? Also, it's interesting to hear that even if there was a water hazard on Matt's left, he would still hit his stock draw, rather than try to take it out of play by hitting a fade. Was Matt playing cast irons like Pings---that might have (marginally) assisted him in hitting it so straight? Or was he using forged muscle back or cut muscle back irons? Were there any equipment characteristics that were allowing him to hit it so straight? Extra stiff iron shafts? X-100's? What would you estimate his driver swing speed to be? 115mph? Thanks, again. Yes, and I totally agree with your premise: "Ballstriking" and GIR are what these guys do better than the mere mortal golfers who wish they could play like them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...