Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6436 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have been playing Callaway X-14s in steel shaft since they came out.
I'm looking to buy a new set and have it narrowed down to two.
1st...Callaway X-20 with stiff graphite shafts.
2nd...Taylor Made R-7 with stiff graphite shafts.
Does anyone have any experience with either ??
Let me hear the good, bad or ugly !!

Thanks in advance !

Posted
I have been playing Callaway X-14s in steel shaft since they came out.

I've hit both at a range, and I find them very similar. I was using stiff steel shafts, though. I liked the Taylor Made Burner XD's, too. The R7's are being discontinued.

Golfunit

In the Bag:

Driver: FT-5 10° Speeder 652 Stiff4-Wood: Taylor Made V-Steel Regular 14.5ºHybrids: Taylor Made Mid 19º and 22ºIrons 4-W MP-60 DG S300Wedges: MP-T 51°06 and 56°10Putter: Red-X


Posted
I found the r7 with stiff graphite shaft a bit "wobbly" and light in the backswing, if that makes any sense to you. Certainly noticed a big difference from steel. If you look away from any special type of shaft, I found both to be very similar when hitting and comparing them.

Posted
I do understand. Of the two I am leaning towards the X-20 because the shaft has a better feel at impact for me.

What about the Ping G-10s ??
How do they compare with the Callaway ?

Posted
I do understand. Of the two I am leaning towards the X-20 because the shaft has a better feel at impact for me.

If you liked X-20, you many want to try X 20 tour as well.

When I tested many irons last year, I almost buy X-20 and happened to test and liked X-20 tour better, maybe it was a shaft (Project X flighted) that I like better than TT uniflex. Club is somewhat forgiving to be in tour's category, but working good for my purpose.

Driver: Big Bertha 460, (9° Steel) | Wood: X Fairway 3W (15° Steel) | Hybrid: X 3H (21° Steel) |
Irons: 4-PW, MP-52 (TT DG S300) | Wedges: X-Forged Chrome 52°/13, 56°/15, 60°/10 (TT DG S300) |
Putter: Ping Karsten Anser


Posted
The Ping G-10's are very good clubs and so are the Callaway x-20 (and x-20 tours). So you can't really go wrong. Just go with whichever you feel more comfortable with. I think The Callway's would probably be a slightly better option but both are worth their money.

Posted
What about the Ping G-10s ??

If you haven't already, you really ought to take a demo set of the Pings out for a round. I still have my old X-14s, but when I tried the Ping G-2 the year they came out, I was hooked. I'll occasionally pull out the X-14s for a round, but I always go back to the Pings.


Posted
I just got the x-20s and I've played 5 rounds with them. I LOVE them!!!

I used to be a 4 handicap, but I'm returning to golf after 10 years away. I'm now around a 9 or 10. I got the Titleist 735s last year, but they were too hard to hit well consistently. I played the x-20s while on vacation as rental clubs and I love them.

I have a pretty high swing speed so I have 6.5 stiff steel shafts. My 9 iron carry distance is about 143 yards.

The sweet spot is so large on this club, I don't find that I often hit the 'jumper' shot that is 10+ yards longers when you really get it on the screws.... rather when you really toe or heel one, you can't feel it as much, but your ball flight is much better then a gross mishead with a perimeter weighted club.

Posted
I do understand. Of the two I am leaning towards the X-20 because the shaft has a better feel at impact for me.

Your decision should definitely be based on how they feel and look to you. Personally I tested the x-20's, x-20 tour, g10's, i10's, r7, and r7tp. As a person new to the game, I wanted clubs that I could grow into for a couple of years. The x-20's topline looked way too thick for my taste, g10's wide sole made it a more super game improvement iron than a game improvement iron. I ended up with the r7's as they fit my aesthetic taste as well as some forgiveness and shot shaping ability. Have not regretted my decision at all.

All in all, you can't go wrong with the x20, r7, or g10.. they are all decent irons with forgiveness.

Driver: G10 9* Matrix Ozik XCON6
Woods: i15 15.5*S UST Mamiya Axivcore Tour Red
Hybrids: i15 23*S UST Mamiya Axivcore Tour Red; i15 23* UST Mamiya Axivcore Tour Red
Irons: S57 5-PW DG S300
Wedges: Vintage Tour 52*; :eidolon: 56* & 60*Putter: Studio Select Newport 2


Note: This thread is 6436 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.