Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My iron fitting showed I need 1-1.5 degrees upright and I should be set. That's getting done next week.

My driver was not so cut and dried. I have a Taylormade Burner 9.5 degree with the 50 gram stiff-flex Fujikura shaft. I hit on the launch monitor and got the following averages:

Swing speed: 104 MPH
Ball speed: 147 MPH
Launch angle: 18.2 degrees
Ball spin: 3,702 RPM
Carry: 247 yards
Total: 269 yards
PTR: 141

His observations were as follows: my spin rate and launch angle are too high. He said I should be down around 13 degrees or so and my spin rate should be more around 3,000 RPM. He attributed it to the shaft in my driver. So, he gave me a Ping G10 that was 9 degrees with a supposedly mid-high kickpoint Grafalloy Pro Launch Red (this was supposed to be more for a shaft comparison). My averages there were this:

Swing speed: 105 MPH
Ball speed: 150 MPH
Launch angle: 18.5
Ball spin: 3,740
Carry: 254 yards
Total: 276 yards
PTR: 143

He was a little bit stumped. He still thinks I need a mid-high or high kickpoint shaft, but the numbers between the two shafts basically were the same. He thought my Burner was a low kickpoint and causing my high launch.

He seems to think I'm leaving a fair amount of distance on the table with these launch conditions. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Any specific shaft I should look at?

Thanks.

  • Administrator
Posted
Swing speed: 104 MPH

I'm suspicious of the numbers. At 105 MPH, carrying the ball 250is about the most you can reasonably expect, maybe 260 if you flat nail one. You weren't nailing them: 18.5° and 3700 spin. Your smash factor isn't quite up there either: 1.43. Ideally you'd like that a bit closer to 1.5.

So anyway, I wouldn't look at the yardages their machines are givin' ya. I think they're bunk. However, if you can trust the other numbers - the launch angle and spin - then yeah, you definitely want to try to get to 13 or so and 3000. If the two drivers didn't work for you, I'd start to look at your technique next. It seems like you might have been hitting down on the ball a little - that'd cut your smash factor a little and add more spin. But it doesn't explain the high launch. So who knows - maybe the machine is all goofed up, and you can't trust any of the numbers. Someone with more experience at actually using fitting machines could probably help you better than I could here. Everardo?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just a couple of questions. Why did he not give you a higher kickpoint shaft? Also, what balls were you using? The ones you play with?

FWIW, my fitting numbers were similar. The recommendation was made to go to a lower torque shaft, higher kickpoint and a little heavier, 75 grams. Was that the only shaft he gave you? Was there a limited availability?

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
As far as the reliability of the numbers, those yardages are what I can hit on the course. I would definitely never claim to be part of the 300 club, but I know I can hit the 260-270 total that is being listed. I've done it on the course several times.

I was using the exact ball I play with (Titleist NXT Extreme) on the monitor. As far as shaft availability, that was the only one he had me try. I'm not sure about other shafts/clubs being available.

  • Administrator
Posted
As far as the reliability of the numbers, those yardages are what I can hit on the course. I would definitely never claim to be part of the 300 club, but I know I can hit the 260-270 total that is being listed. I've done it on the course several times.

Then I'm not sure I'd trust the launch and spin numbers, or maybe the swing speed is off.

At 105 MPH, with near-perfect launch conditions, the furthest you could really expect to carry the ball consistently is 250-260. Something's suspect.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Here's a chart that I use for reference often. The numbers do look a bit tweaked, I'm wondering if the calibration is just a touch off but it's also hard to know without seeing your swing. The launch is too high so I'd try another shaft with a higher kickpoint or even a heavier shaft but it still it going to rely on your swing.

Is there another shop or fitter in the area that you can double check these numbers against?
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have a lesson scheduled for this week to have my driver swing looked at. I'll see what progress is made there and re-evaluate. I'm sure there are other places, but I'll have to hunt them down. The only other place that I know of for sure would be Golf Smith, but are they going to be any better?

Posted
i reckon the numbers look fine, he is only claiming 247 yards Carry not 260 plus

smash factor of 1.43 or 1.44 is a lot better than most people would have you believe!

k

Posted
did you see where you are hitting the ball on the club face?
are they close to the top of the edge?
if they are, that might explain the angle and rpm.
i have the similar problem with my swing. a little bit over the top.
that's why i'm launching every driver 18, 19 degree with tons of rpm.

Launcher 460 10.5° <BB Solution 130 R>
Wishon 949MC 16.5° <SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 R>
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23° <UST SR2 R>
MX-23 5-PW <KBS Tour R>
Vokey 250.08, SM54.10, SM58.08 <DG Wedge> Callie 33.75"TLT Series 4MOI matched


Posted
I tend to hit around the middle of the face on the vertical axis. My inconsistency comes from heel to toe.

Note: This thread is 6419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.