Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6251 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well I am hoping for new clubs soon. I was looking at ping i10s and s57. callaway x forged. I looked at the cg2's because of their price on TGW. I was pointed to the cg reds and asked about the cg2's and the guy had no idea. didn't play golf long just worked there. I was just wondering how similer/different are the cg2's and the cg red irons sets. I have gotten decent with the pro selects and it's time to upgrade.
thanks guys

Bag: Ogio
Driver: Cleveland HiBore XLS 9.5 gold stiff
3W: Pro Select 15*
Irons: Pro Select 3-PW
Wedge:Adams Tom Watson set GW, SW, LWPutter: Cleveland VP 1balls: E6+ or Srixonshoes: Adidas powerband"Stop looking at my ears and play!"Home course. Antler Creek; tees; Black 77.5/150, Gold...


Posted
i never did like the muted feel of the reds, felt very spongy or rubbery if i recall, not much feedback.

I would definetly take the cg2 over them, much more feedback and workability, that set will last you a while.

Or check out the MP 60's, sweet set of sticks that can be found kinda cheaper used.

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...


Posted
I have an i10 set and could not be happier. (i5s are much different than i10s.) I have also hit the cg reds a bit. I liked the shaft better (Dynamic Gold) because of its weighting but i hit the i10s better. As far as Mizunos, I tried my friend's MP-60s (I think...his were complete blade no cavity) and the feel was amazing...very very soft just not as forgiving as I would like.

All of the sets that you mentioned (except for the MP-57 and CG2s) I have hit and enjoyed. It all comes down to your own personal preference and need for forgiveness.

In my Ogio Ozone Bag:
TM Superquad 9.5* UST Proforce 77g Stiff
15* Sonartec SS-2.5 (Pershing stiff)
19* TM Burner (stock stiff)
4-U - PING i10 White dot, +1.25 inches, ZZ65 stiff shafts55*/11* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)60*/12* Snake Eyes Form Forged (DGS300)Ping i10 1/2 MoonTitleist ProV1


Posted
I do have the CG2s and will post back on them shortly. I'm just engrosed with the Packers - Titans game at the moment. Sorry to post and run but I wanted to make sure I can find this thread later. I've had the CG2s in my bag for almost a year, so I'd be glad to answer anything specific you would like to know about them.

Posted
Here's my experience with the CG2s after playing them for 10 months. Forgive me if it goes too long.

These clubs look as good at address as they do in the bag. They definitely have a players profile with a thin (not the thinnest) top line. The offset is almost non existent in the bottom half of the set. Mine are shafted with DG R300s. The feedback with this combo is amazing. I have hit forged irons, both cavity back and blades, and to me these are as "soft" or softer than most of those. That is no dis whatsoever on the forged market. It is just praise for these irons. I don't know if it is the CMM material (which I thought was marketing BS) or the shaft/head combo. And I realize one man's soft is another man's "mushy".

As for performance, these are way more forgiving than they look. Mishits get you near the green unless you totally dog it. I don't hit fades, but on the rare times I try to play a draw/hook I have never had problems working the ball right to left. I do try to hit low or high on command which these clubs are quite capable of. If you are in between clubs simply delofting the shorter one will get you close to your target. And honestly, these clubs are like throwing darts when it comes to the accuracy of your left/right line.

They are not the most forgiving irons. They are more forgiving than they look. I would recommend anyone under an 18 that's considering these to try them. I get lots of flack from new playing partners such as "those are blades, or you have to be scratch to hit those". I've proved most of them wrong. These clubs won't help you much if you sway a lot and hit fat shots; the sole is too thin for that. And if your course has a lot of bad lies you may find the longer irons harder to hit out of those lies. My course conditions are terrible so I only carry the bottom half of the set.

In summary the CG2S are hefty, player's profile irons that are capable of working the ball any direction you like. But if straight shots are your preference, there is no problem setting up to the ball and lasering a shot on target. They will forgive slight mishits and punish fat shots. They have a beautiful, simple and graphics free look and a mid launch trajectory. Just my humble opinion. I can't say I'll never get rid of them. I can't say that of any club….except my putter.

Posted
well that answered my ? I was going to ask. thanks for the info. very informative.

Bag: Ogio
Driver: Cleveland HiBore XLS 9.5 gold stiff
3W: Pro Select 15*
Irons: Pro Select 3-PW
Wedge:Adams Tom Watson set GW, SW, LWPutter: Cleveland VP 1balls: E6+ or Srixonshoes: Adidas powerband"Stop looking at my ears and play!"Home course. Antler Creek; tees; Black 77.5/150, Gold...


Note: This thread is 6251 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
    • I think part of it is there hasn't been enough conclusive studies specific to golf regarding block studies. Maybe the full swing, you can't study it because it is too complicated and to some degree it will fall into variable or random.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.