Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5226 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anybody else thing that the OEMs overcompensate for shaft droop with graphite shafts and make the drivers and fairway woods too upright?  I do.  If you're old enough to have played with real wooden woods, you know that solid persimmon or laminated maple drivers used to come standard with a 43 or 43½" shaft, and even with the shorter shaft, the standard lie angle was 55°.  Now driver shafts are at least 45" long, and instead of having flatter lies, or even just keeping the lies the same for graphite shaft droop, they actually make the lie angles much stronger.

I wish titanium came with the same options as real wood.   You used to be able to custom order woods and actually specify the lie angles, face angles, and loft you wanted, and sometimes even the amount of bulge and roll.  You sure can't do that with metal, no matter how many trick hosels they give you.  In fact, for those few who would still play real wood, Louisville Golf still does take those custom orders.   I just don't imagine that it's a very big demographic.

Taylormade RocketBallz.....13° tour spoon;  Ping G15.....17° fairway wood;  Callaway RAZR X Blk.....24° fairway wood;

Epon AF-901....19° driving iron;  Wishon 870Ti....5-8 irons (1° weak), 9-iron (2° weak); Nakashima SuperSpin.....52, 58, 64° wedges;

Lovett Tour Standard.....sand iron; Louisville HB.....putter.


Posted


Originally Posted by Aging Boomer

Does anybody else thing that the OEMs overcompensate for shaft droop with graphite shafts and make the drivers and fairway woods too upright?



Yes and no.  For one, shot misdirection from the lie angle is proportional to the loft of the club.  With drivers having the flatest (in terms of loft) the affect is really minimal.  Today's drivers are now being built anywhere from 45" to 46.5" as "standard", and with the lighter shafts that are installed into 200g (+/) heads there is going to be a little more droop than a steel shaft at 42" - 43".  I think the other reason would be the natural slice tendency that the majority of amateurs players have, and having a driver more upright is one more little thing the OEM's can do to try to help correct for it.

I think the argument could be made either way.... it's either more upright to compensate for today's longer, lighter shafts; or it's more upright to help the average Joe who's miss is to the right.

I play my driver (W/58° lie) at 43.5", so it really isn't an annoyance since at that length it isn't pointing sky.

Originally Posted by Aging Boomer

I wish titanium came with the same options as real wood.   You used to be able to custom order woods and actually specify the lie angles, face angles, and loft you wanted, and sometimes even the amount of bulge and roll.  You sure can't do that with metal, no matter how many trick hosels they give you.  In fact, for those few who would still play real wood, Louisville Golf still does take those custom orders.   I just don't imagine that it's a very big demographic.

You can specify any head to be hand picked from almost any component manufacturer that is worth a turd.  In the custom built world, the builder would use face angle as a compensation for lie.


Posted

Missing to the right is a problem when it's a dead push, but when it's an unintentional slice, it's merely the product of a very unathletic swing.  If one continually casts the club over the top, one is making no effort whatever to correct it.  It's not rocket science, honest.  Controlling a natural hook is much harder.

Another problem is that OEMs act as if everybody with a slower swing speed is a slicer.  If a driver has high loft, it also has a closed face and an upright lie angle.  Apparently, there's no such thing as somebody with a good swing who's merely lost swing speed to age or reduced flexibility.

Fortunately, there are a few manufacturers who'll custom grind irons and wedges.   Drivers and fairways woods are harder.  I'm getting by with some Henry-Griffitts custom clubs, but even they don't compare to my Louisville custom wooden woods as far an accurate fit goes.   Right now, nobody is making, and apparently except for me, nobody is even asking for, metalwoods with loft, lie, and face angle specs similar to the old wooden clubs.  The original TaylorMade metalwood line from the early 1980s had such specs, but just about nothing since.  It's not going to change, but it would be nice if just one manufacturer went after that niche market. I should consider reshafting and regripping those thirty year oldTaylorMade fairway woods.  The drivers are just too small.

Taylormade RocketBallz.....13° tour spoon;  Ping G15.....17° fairway wood;  Callaway RAZR X Blk.....24° fairway wood;

Epon AF-901....19° driving iron;  Wishon 870Ti....5-8 irons (1° weak), 9-iron (2° weak); Nakashima SuperSpin.....52, 58, 64° wedges;

Lovett Tour Standard.....sand iron; Louisville HB.....putter.


Posted


Originally Posted by Aging Boomer

Missing to the right is a problem when it's a dead push, but when it's an unintentional slice, it's merely the product of a very unathletic swing.  If one continually casts the club over the top, one is making no effort whatever to correct it.  It's not rocket science, honest.  Controlling a natural hook is much harder.



I am meaning a slice, which the large majority of amateurs do.  And it is almost always a product of a swing fault.  But the OEM's know that most people will try to buy a better game than learn one.

Originally Posted by Aging Boomer

Another problem is that OEMs act as if everybody with a slower swing speed is a slicer.  If a driver has high loft, it also has a closed face and an upright lie angle.  Apparently, there's no such thing as somebody with a good swing who's merely lost swing speed to age or reduced flexibility.

OEM's are more concerned with profit than they are the small % of better players,  All one has to do is look at the stuff that's being thrown in our faces every 6 months.

You probably aren't going to find the club you want from TM, Callaway, etc.  Heck even the one hand-made truly custom metal head I could find was over $600, and the flattest lie they would make was 58°!


Posted

At impact, the club shaft had bowed downward and shortens slightly. This occurs with steel or graphite shafts. This is one reason some pros advise players to rock the club slightly on its heel at address - the bowing will being it back to square to ground at impact.

Quote:

I am meaning a slice, which the large majority of amateurs do.  And it is almost always a product of a swing fault.  But the OEM's know that most people will try to buy a better game than learn one.

Two things which amateurs do to miss right:

* An over-the-top swing motion, which produces a slice or - on some days - a low pull.

* Bad alignment. Rather than aligning the feet parallel to the line of flight (railroad tracks), some amateurs line up their feet toward the target. This guarantees a miss right (for right-handers).

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5226 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.