Neuman's article is rather interesting. As someone who started golf by playing on short executive and par 3 courses, I certainly agree that these types of courses are not only fun but also help to bring new golfers into the game.
What I find a bit odd is his assertion that we actually need more of them, especially in light of the fact that par 3s are closing at a higher rate than standard courses. If they were in such demand, I really don't think they would be closing up shop.
Here in my little corner of the Midwest, the general "problem" seems to be that there are too many golf courses competing for too few golfers' dollars. When you can often get discounted greens fees at one of the top courses in the state for $25 with cart for 18 holes on a weekday, it is hardly surprising that little par 3s can't hang with the big boys. The fact that some of you were paying under $10 for 9 holes speaks to this fact. There is simply no way to make money by charging those prices.
Certainly this enviable situation for many golfers in the Midwest sounds rather wacky to those of you living in areas like New England, where I am originally from. Perhaps there is demand for more short courses in other parts of the country but if the recent crisis has revealed anything, it is that golf is a sport that suffers when the economy hits the skids.