Jump to content
IGNORED

Sweeper vs. Divot?


Eeryck
Note: This thread is 5715 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

In many posts many folks will recommend taking a divot with their irons. It seems that if I take my normal swing with my normal set-up and consistant contact I have a tendancy to consistantly sweep the ball off the turf.

Now I don't really have a problem with this as it is working for me at the moment and allowing me to play down the course and allowing me to focus my practice on putting and chipping where I am losing a lot of strokes.

I have just taken some video and realized that my right arm is taking over at impact and pushing my left hand/wrist is very pronated at impact which I am sure is contributing to my complete lack of divot. Since I have to make a correction of the position of my left wrist at impact (supination) should there also be some focus on taking a divot?

In short does a divot with an iron indicate a more repeatable swing technique? or are some golfers just naturally sweepers?

In my Grom bag:

Driver........... Burner 9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood......... Burner 15* S-Flex
5-Wood......... Ovation 18* S-FlexIrons............. Pro Combos 3,5-PW Rifle 6.0Wedges......... CG12 52.10, 56.14, 60.10Putter............ 33" VP1 Milled PutterBall................ e6+ or B330-SRangefinder.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This depends on a couple of things.

Are you a sweeper because you have a shallow attack angle or are you a sweeper because your swing is bottoming out before getting to the ball or never actually bottoms out?

Most people who don't take a divot tend to try and help the ball up and are probably hitting the ball thin because they are making contact with the ball as the club is on it's way up instead of on the way down.

Take some practice swings and pay attention to where the grass divot starts. That is where your swing is bottoming out, now put the ball at the very back part of where the divot starts, not in the middle and then try and hit the ball. See how that feels for you, there is nothing wrong with have a sweeper swing as long as it is because you have a shallow attack angle and not because you are contacting the ball at the wrong part of your swing or are lifting, trying to help the ball up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


On my practice swings my club first touches the grass at approximately the point where the ball is touching the ground. Sometimes a small bit behind the ball and sometimes a bit ahead but not more than about 1/2 inch either way.

In my Grom bag:

Driver........... Burner 9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood......... Burner 15* S-Flex
5-Wood......... Ovation 18* S-FlexIrons............. Pro Combos 3,5-PW Rifle 6.0Wedges......... CG12 52.10, 56.14, 60.10Putter............ 33" VP1 Milled PutterBall................ e6+ or B330-SRangefinder.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
This depends on a couple of things.

It does, and some players - Tom Watson and myself included (not that I'm in any way comparing myself or my swing to Tom) - are sweepers. Sweeping doesn't necessarily mean "swing flaw" or "fix it!"

But in general, yeah, taking a divot with the mid and short irons is generally the way to go for most players. I don't (and Tom doesn't) sweep my short irons. Mid-irons it depends, as sometimes I will and sometimes I won't.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5715 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
    • Of course there's not a simple or knowable answer here. But the whole Caitlin Clark phenomenon is a nice example IMO. Suddenly there was wall to wall media coverage and national attention and... the women's tournament got similar ratings to the men's and much higher ratings than the men in the final four. With every indication that there will be some portion of the uptick that remains going forward. And there's the whole element that Sue Bird brought up. That basketball needed a pretty enough white superstar guard. One who looks like the "cute little white girls" that describes most of the soccer USWNT that's been able to achieve much higher popularity than any version of women's basketball, which is dominated by black players and none of any race who could be described as little... I do think women's sports are in a good place to start taking off more though. It's really only in the coming 5-10 years that the majority of girls will start to come of age with post Title IX grandmothers (as in their grandmothers were allowed to be serious athletes). I don't follow men's or women's basketball much, but in golf for sure the women's tour has gotten much deeper over the past 20 years and only looks to keep going in that direction. I've heard the same about women's basketball. And the patriarchal attitudes that socialized girls out of sports and everyone out of women's sports fandom aren't gone but have def diminished.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...