Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6539 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys. You sick of me yet???

I mentioned in another thread that I purchased a new 2008 X fairway 3 wood, stock stiff shaft, at Golfsmith the other day. Well today I went back to Golfsmith to see the numbers on the launch monitor. Check this out.

I hit about 10 balls with the club (off of a tee flush with the ground). My max was about 210, but most shots averaged about 200 yards. Also, the launch angle was pretty low (in the 10 degree range). Swing speed was in the high 80s. Okay, time to try out the reg flex. First shot -- bam, 220 carry and 227 with roll out. Second shot, pow, 218 carry and 225 with roll out. Third shot, fourth shot, fifth shot, more of the same. Also, the launch angle jumped up to around 14-15 degrees.

I cannot emphasize the importance of hitting new drivers/woods you're considering on the launch monitor.

I'm going back tomorrow tomorrow to hit the reg flex in the Hyper X driver. I purchased the Big Bertha 460 (10 degree stiff flex), but I'm thinking there's something about the shaft in the X line (in reg flex) that might work for me. I'll post up the results tomorrow.

e


Posted

The monitors I have used at stores are dishonest. They act significantly different with the same clubs and ball (I bring my own). They tell me that a 7.5* loft driver is a great deal better for me than a 12* loft driver. I have used an 8* and a 12* in real conditions. The 8* would not leave the ground most of the time. I have seen driver hits back up after hitting the ground. All of the in-store monitors I have ever seen are off mats. Even the best mats do not punish bad contact with the ground as accurately as real turf. The store staff can "fine tune" the systems for certain reasons including fraud. Almost every truely amazing shot I have ever got was one on a monitor.


Posted
The monitors I have used at stores are dishonest. They act significantly different with the same clubs and ball (I bring my own). They tell me that a 7.5* loft driver is a great deal better for me than a 12* loft driver. I have used an 8* and a 12* in real conditions. The 8* would not leave the ground most of the time. I have seen driver hits back up after hitting the ground.

I agree, but only to an extent. I mean, sure, the store is in the business of selling clubs, so it wants the numbers to be as favorable as possible, but I would also think that they want happy customers as well.

Also, even if the launch monitor is inaccurate, wouldn't it be inaccurate for all the clubs you try? In other words, even if it's "tweaked" to make it seem as if you're hitting it better than you actually are, it should still provide a meaningful basis for comparison.

Posted
In most cases, increasing the spin rates on the launch monitors will make the more expensive pro version clubs and/or shafts (pro shafts are a good bit better, but not THAT much anymore) give more distance than the normal versions. Additionally, the pro version heads will probably display a more reasonable horizontal-plane trajectory than should be for their common fade bias.

Backspin can reduce sidespin though gyroscopic means because it is the stronger of the two forces. Slices or hooks (curving ball flights) are produced because of too much inappropraitely applied sidespin. Increasing backspin will reduce slices and hooks.

Backspin is characteristically a reducer of distance in drives. The pro version clubs will typically score better because they are designed with very low spin for very high swingspeeds. Still, all of the clubs will perform horrible at this stage of modification. To offset the short distances among all of the clubs, the initial speed of the ball is boosted on the monitor, bringing the average back to normal. The special pro versions should still give better distances after that final "correction."

This kind of mod to the software defaults in the monitor will almost universally make the more expensive upgrades score better than their normal versions in distance. A large amount of clubs now have a pro/tour version and a standard version shaft, head, or both.

I was pointed out this by a launch monitor operator. He fired a sales employee for doing something like this to make a sale.

Note: This thread is 6539 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,668 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦🟦🟦 🟧⬛⬛🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • First going to spain for a long weekend in March probably going to play La Quinta, Los Arqueros and Fina Cortesin, and first week in May will compete in the Crawsnest Tassie at Carnoustie golf links, that will be a full week of golf golf golf and more golf. Did play it last year for the first time and it is awesome.
    • Scrubs is coming back to ABC. February 25.
    • Day 47: simulator day! Played St. Andrew’s and shot a +1. Not bad, especially with having to putt at this simulator set up. Had about 5 minutes at the end to work on some feels as well. 
    • I think you're saying it's preposterous to think that the areas on this club are anything like what's shown here: 30mm toward the toe or heel loses only 5% distance? Highly, highly doubtful. So a guy who hits the ball there and normally hits the ball about 250… will hit it instead about 238. By missing the sweet spot by about 1.2 inches? Highly, highly doubtful. Heck, the high heel barely gets into the red, and orange is only "up to" 10%! @M2R, I've never heard of "Ask Golf Nut" but I'm dubious of his claims in the video and really, really dubious of what's on his site: "Why AskGolfNut Is the Most Trusted Data-Driven Golf Resource". Hmmmmmm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.