Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6456 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Are you a swinger or a hitter?

    • I'm a swinger (left hand driving, right hand passive)
      17
    • I'm a hitter (right hand driving, left hand semi-passive)
      17
    • I don't know
      13


Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm wondering who on this board is a swinger and who on this board is a hitter.

I'm going through my teacher which teaches from The Golfing Machine by Homer Kelly and basically there seems to be two types of players.

The swinger that drives with the butt/bottom of the flat left wrist out in front of the ball and downwards while leaving the right hand passive during their swing.

The hitter that forces down and outwards with the right hand where the hands meets the wrist while keeping the left wrist flat.


Both seem to work well and I'm currently a swinger that is struggling with lag timing at times and considering going with the hitters approach.

I'm a very tall, very strong armed guy and I think the hitter approach tends to steer me in that direction rather than the swingers approach which lends itself better to more flexible players.


I was wondering what the majority of players on this board or between the two and how they feel about the two techniques.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
I voted swinger,but don't conciously engage any hand action at all.I swing on plane like Jim Hardy teaches,but turn aggressively at the start of my swing with a hip turn,and then that momentum is the trigger for me to freewheel the rest of the way.

My arms and hands really I try to leave as dead as possible.As most people have remarked about my swing,that it doesn't look fast,but I seem to still get enough distance.

"Repetition is the chariot of genius"

Driver: BENROSS VX PROTO 10.5
Woods: BENROSS QUAD SPEED FAIRWAY 15"
Hybrids:BENROSS 3G 17" BENROSSV5 Escape 20"
Irons: :wilson: DEEP RED Fluid Feel  4-SW
Putter: BENROSS PURE RED
Balls: :wilsonstaff:  Ti DNA


Posted
dont really agree with the op swing theory so neither - i am a hitter i hit it with everything! Sharp accelaration just before impact.

I would say a swinger has a smoother acceleration.

That has always been how i distinguish between swingers and hitters.

Posted
I'm a swinger using the master key instruction, but my right hand is not passive. I just don't think about it.

I know my right hand is not passive, because if I take it off the club, I cannot make much of a swing.

Posted
My left thumb controls everything.

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...


Posted
I'm a swinger using the master key instruction, but my right hand is not passive. I just don't think about it.

Well typically if you have an active right hand as a swinger then you wind up with club head throw away which adds loft to clubs, reduces swing speed, reduces club head lag, and leads to a lot of sweeping of the ball.

But it acts as a guide no matter what just having it there so swinging one handed poorly isn't really surprising is it?

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Well typically if you have an active right hand as a swinger then you wind up with club head throw away which adds loft to clubs, reduces swing speed, reduces club head lag, and leads to a lot of sweeping of the ball.

I think we are just not on the same page about the meaning of the words active and passive.


Posted
I'm wondering who on this board is a swinger and who on this board is a hitter.

I am a swinger and I teach ALL of my students to be the same. For over 30 years, I have been a golf instructor, and the golf swings that I tell my students to emulate are Freddie Couples, Fred Funk, the late Payne Stewart, Slammin' Sammy Snead, Steve Elkington, etc. They all have or had smooth swings, with good tempo, rhythm, balance, and timing.

People ask me how well that emphasis works. Here are the results in my own case: I am 60 years old and play 3 times a month, and still score to a 4 handicap. My distance is the same as when I was 20. How is this possible? I practice in the backyard nearly every day, and seldom hit plastic balls. What I do is swing 100 times emphasizing rhythm, and doing the "1,2, 3 count" that Sam Snead used to think when he swung. Also, I practice, practice, and practice my short game. RESULTS: I almost never miss a fairway, and average hitting 12 to 14 greens in regulation. Being a swinger makes you a consistent striker of the balll PROVIDED that you have good fundamentals and PRACTICE faithfully.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


Posted
I am a swinger and I teach ALL of my students to be the same. For over 30 years, I have been a golf instructor, and the golf swings that I tell my students to emulate are Freddie Couples, Fred Funk, the late Payne Stewart, Slammin' Sammy Snead, Steve Elkington, etc. They all have or had smooth swings, with good tempo, rhythm, balance, and timing.

I'm torn right now Pez.

I feel that as a swinger I have a bit more fluid, limber, and get a tad more feel on shots. But lately practicing hitting I feel that I am already becoming more consistent. I hit 300+ balls per day and I don't have to take a winter break here in South Louisiana so I could do either one but I'm finding swinging to take far more precision than hitting. The timing just has to be 100% there to be a swinger but as a hitter its a lot simpler and the results are very similar. Plus its practically impossible to lag your club improperly. I've picked up about 10 yards per club going from swinging to hitting.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Swinger.

I'm a bit tall (6'3-1/2" in shoes) but not strong armed. I rely on a large swing arc and a big shoulder turn (among other things) to get my distance. I do try to make sure I'm swinging through the ball with the back of my left hand and a firm left wrist. I think this helps me with accuracy.

Bringing the right hand into the picture results in mad hooks.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
Well, a man named Ben Hogan always said to hit the ball hard "with both hands." I've always kinda followed that.

I guess that makes me a hitter. I find it very difficult to make left arm only or right arm only swings. I never really understood that drill. If both hands are one unit, why try to control the club with half of that unit?

Driver: 909 D3 10.5 degree Aldila Voodoo S Shaft
3 Wood: MP 001
Irons: MP-67 3-PW
Wedges: 52, 56, 60
Putter: Karsten B60


Posted
Bringing the right hand into the picture results in mad hooks.

That depends on how the right hand is used.

Next time you are at the range try using the joint of the right wrist where the bottom of the palm meets the wrist and see how it goes. A: At address relax the right elbow and arm as much as possible. B: Apply pressure on the mentioned point of your hand at address. C: Begin your backswing and maintain that pressure throughout. D: In your downswing maintain that pressure and straighten your right arm outwards and downwards through impact (effectively releasing that pressure and using the right arm like a piston). I've been experimenting with it and I find that it gives me much better lag throughout, more distance, and more control on some shots. However, until you get the feel of it you will feel alot more tense throughout your swing and won't have that fluidity until you manage to localize the pressure. But now that I'm starting to figure that out I'm finding my swing is much slower and smoother overall (though I feel slightly more rigid) despite the fact that I'm gaining distance.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
Well, a man named Ben Hogan always said to hit the ball hard "with both hands." I've always kinda followed that.

I think that the premise is both hands are working together for a common goal, not both hands are doing the same thing.

If both hands were doing the same thing then you would want both wrists cocked, not one flat and one cocked or vice versa.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
I think that the premise is both hands are working together for a common goal, not both hands are doing the same thing.

Actually, they both cock. While the left wrist is flat, it is clearly cocked up. You may be confusing cupping with cocking.


Posted
The right arm drives in any swing, its more of when and where the power is turned on as opposed to all or nothing. As someone above stated, they thought their right hand/arm passive until they realized they could not swing the same without it. To me swingers hit hard with the right after impact and hitters engage the right prior to impact.

Posted
Actually, they both cock. While the left wrist is flat, it is clearly cocked up. You may be confusing cupping with cocking.

The left wrist never cocks.

It rolls and travels upwards when the club head rotates during the takeaway. But it does not cock. In fact you should be able to literally stop virtually anywhere in your swing and without moving your wrists in the slightest return to a proper address of the ball.

Certified G.O.L.F. Machine Addict


Posted
That depends on how the right hand is used.

Are you trying to mess up my swing

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Note: This thread is 6456 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.