Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6274 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
No, I'm not trying to convince anybody that a firehose and an RPG are an even fight. I wouldn't insult anyones intelligence like that. My point was just that a firehose has historically been an excellent tool for preventing would-be pirates from physically getting on board your vessel without escalating the situation by attempting to kill them. For the people on the ship that is the best possible outcome.

Speaking as someone who has been all over the world on cargo vessels I can say that I would accept the inherent risk of taking a ship through a dangerous place as part of the job I chose to take. If that means there's an astronomically slim chance that I'd be taken hostage and killed in a worst case scenario, so be it. I probably take worse chances than that driving on the freeways in LA. What I would not accept would be a shipping company expecting me to endanger myself to a much greater degree by arming me and automatically turning the rare confrontation into a full on gun fight. And there is nothing simple about transferring people on or off a vessel at sea. If we were to try what you suggest I would wager that more lives would be lost in the process than pirates would be responsible for normally.

There are plenty of things that happen every day all over the world that are contrary to what the US and every other civilized country believes in, but just throwing a bunch of localized money and firepower at a global problem usually isn't a solution on its own. So while I wholly support taking action against piracy, it just has to be realistic action with realistic expectations for results. Nobody on earth has the power to completely stop piracy, never have and never will.

Posted

If anything needs to be done, the proper solution would be to use military support, not to arm individuals.

You guys know that you can already get an escort anyway? A few of other nations have been cashing in:
For added peace of mind there is the option of hiring a private warship to watch over your vessel. "A full military escort by the Yemen navy through the Gulf of Aden currently costs $50,000 for three days," says Mr Davis. His company rents patrol boats off the Yemen navy and passes the cost onto merchant ship owners who are prepared to pay for the service. "If you are hijacked you are going to have a bill of not less $5m... So that is a pretty small price to pay for guaranteed security," he adds.

Source

Posted
No, I'm not trying to convince anybody that a firehose and an RPG are an even fight. I wouldn't insult anyones intelligence like that. My point was just that a firehose has historically been an excellent tool for preventing would-be pirates from physically getting on board your vessel without escalating the situation by attempting to kill them. For the people on the ship that is the best possible outcome.

Navy and Marine vets that I work with say it's done safely every day....I was in the Army, and have no experience with water transfers, so I'll take their word for it. as for completely stopping piracy, from what I read, it's only happening in one part of the globe, to the extent where ships are at risk EVERY DAY!!!! we CAN eliminate it with enough force, but the backlash from the PC followers would be outrageous.


Posted
No, I'm not trying to convince anybody that a firehose and an RPG are an even fight. I wouldn't insult anyones intelligence like that. My point was just that a firehose has historically been an excellent tool for preventing would-be pirates from physically getting on board your vessel

Would the situation not be escalated by this point? i mean they are attempting to board your ship.. correct me if im wrong but this would be no different then someone breaking into your house. I am sure that the workers on these ships are already shooting water at them, but we can all see how far thats gotten them..

As for the issue of getting men on and off of a ship, i asked a marine buddy of mine, you can fast rope of a helo onto a ship no problem, but sence these vessels are not desighned for something like a helo landing on them, that route would be harder (but not impossible) to accomplish. He said that getting them off through small boats before they exit international waters would not be hard. Hell if the pirates can do it, i would assume a trained detail could do it. What i dont understand is this, the pirates carry guns, no one seems to be doing any thing great to stop them, but when the law abiding people on board these ships try to carry weapons to protect themselves it is a crime. The wrong people are being punished.

|Callaway FT-9 Tour Neutral 9.5 Diamana BlueBoard| TaylorMade TourLaunch 14.5 Matrix Ozik F7M2 X| Adams Idea Pro 20 Matrix Ozik Altus X| Mizuno MP-32 4-PW TTDG S300|Titleist Vokey 50| Tour Issue Titleist Black Ni Vokey SM 54|Callaway X Forged 62 || Kirk Currie Brazos| Callaway Tour IX/...


Posted
Would the situation not be escalated by this point? i mean they are attempting to board your ship.. correct me if im wrong but this would be no different then someone breaking into your house.

I look at it more like being a teller confronted by violent group of bank robbers. I am much more willing to risk my life to protect my home and family from an intruder than I am to risk it protecting a ship/bank and a bunch of insurance company money. The majority of these situations do not end in bloodshed at all, so I would feel no need to force the issue. And honestly if ten heavily armed Somali pirates broke into my house I don't know how much of a fight I'd put up even if I was armed. If they were there to harm people I would only be able to stop a few of them before they killed me, and if they were just there to rob or kidnap me cooperating from the outset would be my best bet to survive.

I can see how people would disagree on this but it makes sense to me to play the odds and not give them that extra reason to try to hurt me. Especially since a ship does actually have a decent chance of preventing them from ever getting on board without firing a shot.
but sence these vessels are not desighned for something like a helo landing on them, that route would be harder (but not impossible) to accomplish.

That's the problem, the average merchant vessel is not designed to regularly handle any sort of helo operations. Maybe I overestimate the severity of danger, but there are enough things that can go wrong with all the variables of the ship, weather, and sea that repeatedly doing something like this would almost have to end in disaster once in a while.

Not only that but the ocean is just very big, and the the logistics and cost involved with constantly moving people on and off even a fraction of the thousands of ships that pass by Somalia alone would be mind boggling. Seriously, who would pay for that?
What i dont understand is this, the pirates carry guns, no one seems to be doing any thing great to stop them

I think the friendly Naval forces of the world are doing a pretty decent job responding wherever they can. If you're an American ship that puts out a distress call and someone like the Indian Navy hears it, they'll come help you if they can. But like I said before, the ocean is huge and it's impossible to be everywhere at once.

as for completely stopping piracy, from what I read, it's only happening in one part of the globe

I don't know where you read that, but they were quite wrong. It happens all over the world, but the coasts of Africa and SE Asia are the hotbeds. The Malacca Strait near Indonesia and Malasia used to be the worst part of the world until the Gulf of Aden took over their spot. Basically anywhere there is rampant poverty and a little opportunity, there will be piracy.

The page below has some pretty good information on it. If you read through the incidents in the live report it's pretty simple to see how widespread the problem is, and how many of the attacks were thwarted without the use of deadly arms. http://www.icc-ccs.org/index.php?opt...map&Itemid;=219 Again, I know there's plenty of room for disagreement on this issue and appreciate the discussion here. It's a tough nut to crack for sure.

Posted
I look at it more like being a teller confronted by violent group of bank robbers. I am much more willing to risk my life to protect my home and family from an intruder than I am to risk it protecting a ship/bank and a bunch of insurance company money. The majority of these situations do not end in bloodshed at all, so I would feel no need to force the issue. And honestly if ten heavily armed Somali pirates broke into my house I don't know how much of a fight I'd put up even if I was armed. If they were there to harm people I would only be able to stop a few of them before they killed me, and if they were just there to rob or kidnap me cooperating from the outset would be my best bet to survive.

I visited the link you provided, and see that it truely is happening elsewhere... but Good Golly Miss Molly, overwhelmingly it's in one certain area.....


Posted
but Good Golly Miss Molly, overwhelmingly it's in one certain area.....

There's a piece that might help explain how this all came about

here , apparently the pirates are not the only ones that have been taking advantage of the current state of lawlessness in Somalia. Though I almost can't believe the whole nuclear/industrial waste dumping allegations. Almost. If all this stuff is true I think it makes it at least understandable how people could be driven to the point they're at currently.

Note: This thread is 6274 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.