Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I currently am using Titleist 962's and been wanting an upgrade to newer irons. I have been looking into the Titleist 695mb and the Mizuno mp-67. My question is are these newer clubs as forgiving as the 962's? I hit my 962's well and I am steadily improving since getting back into golf.

I guess my concern is I don't necessarily need an extremely forgiving club but do not want to limit myself and make the game harder if I'm not constantly practicing.

If neither of these are forgiving clubs, and suggestions? TIA

Posted
Neither of those are going to be easy to hit, considering the sticks your coming from. I know from experience that the 695mb's are amongst the most unforgiving irons i have ever hit. You really have to have a grooved swing to game those. I would go with the 695cbs or if you want blades, perhaps a mixed set like the 735cm or ZB forged.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
Neither of those are going to be easy to hit, considering the sticks your coming from. I know from experience that the 695mb's are amongst the most unforgiving irons i have ever hit. You really have to have a grooved swing to game those. I would go with the 695cbs or if you want blades, perhaps a mixed set like the 735cm or ZB forged.

I did exactly that last December. Played 962's for 10 years and switched to 695cb's. I love the 695's. Forgiveness is on par with the 962's, which is to say, for a cavity backed club, not much. I gained about a half club due to a little stronger lofts, great forged looks and feel and very workable. I couldn't be happier.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
i too played the 962's for several years (9 straight years) and loved them. i honestly dont think there is any need to change irons if you are hitting them good. i personally think the 962's are just as good as anything else on the market these days. one of my all-time favorite irons for sure

Posted
i too played the 962's for several years (9 straight years) and loved them. i honestly dont think there is any need to change irons if you are hitting them good. i personally think the 962's are just as good as anything else on the market these days. one of my all-time favorite irons for sure

There are people who swear they're among the best irons Titleist ever made. I wouldn't necessarily argue against that!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
i too played the 962's for several years (9 straight years) and loved them. i honestly dont think there is any need to change irons if you are hitting them good. i personally think the 962's are just as good as anything else on the market these days. one of my all-time favorite irons for sure

Interesting....I was just assuming that considering the 962's were 10-15 yrs old that newer irons would provide newer technology. Figured newer irons hit longer and are more forgiving across the board. Am I wrong in that assumption?


Posted
Interesting....I was just assuming that considering the 962's were 10-15 yrs old that newer irons would provide newer technology. Figured newer irons hit longer and are more forgiving across the board. Am I wrong in that assumption?

personally, i dont think there is a lot of difference between the 962's and a similar (players cavity) iron from today. i really dont think you'd see or feel that much difference. i know some people will feel differently, but i dont. im playing with irons that came out 6 years ago and have no intentions of upgrading to something newer because i hit these fine and i know how to use them. i also would have no problem putting the 962's back in my bag. that is one of the best designs ever made imo


Posted
There are newer clubs which are more forgiving, but they are not in the same class as the 962's. I played 962's for about 10 years and would consider those "players irons." Some of the newer MP's from Mizuno are more forgiving than the 962's, but not by much. If you can hit the 962's solid though, I would not worry about finding more forgiving clubs. Go hit some new things at the range, but if you find its not broke, don't fix it!

EGS

910 D3 9.5* Aldila RIP S 70 g
Burner 3 wood 15 * S
Bruner Hybrid 19* S MP-60 S300 4-PW CG 14 52*/10* TP Z 56*/12* TP Z 60*/6* Studio Select Laguna 1.5


Posted
I went from Titleist 962's (6 years) to Ping S58's and recently, to Tour Preferred.

I would think that some sort of cavity back would suit what you're used to. I went from handicap 24 to 6 with the 962's and wanted a more playable club but still with a cavity.

Go try some cavity/semi cavity irons out. Don't look at what the club is or who the manufacturer is. I'd never have considered either of my replacements but hitting them proved it's bad to have preconceptions!

WEAPONS:
Taylormade R9 10.5 L Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 15 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade R9 19 NU YS+6 stiff 65g
Taylormade Tour Preferred 4-PW KBS Tour X-Stiff Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 51Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 55Cleveland CG12 RTG+ DSG 59Yes! Tracy II putterTitleist...


Posted
Bingo for you!

I've been very happy with the 695MB, I think that they are a great set of irons. I don't know how one gauges "forgiveness" so I can't really comment there other than to say that I don't find mishits that punishing, no more than any other forged muscleback anyway.

Yonex Ezone Type 380 | Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro | Miura 1957 Irons | Yururi Wedges | Scotty Cameron Super Rat | TaylorMade Penta


Note: This thread is 6020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • 6 rules changes the PGA Tour is enacting in 2026 (and what triggered them) The PGA Tour shared several rules changes with its players on Tuesday. Here's what you need to know about why the rules have been modified.    
    • JPX ONE Driver - Mizuno Golf Official Website Discover the JPX ONE Driver - /jpxone/jpxone-driver-hero-mobile.webp /jpxone/jpxone-logo-white-lg.svg The World’s first NANOALLOY™ DRIVER... Mizuno is introducing new technology with their JPX One fairway woods and drivers. The new tech for golf but used tech for Mizuno since it is found in their baseball side of the business, is Nanoalloy. Nanoalloy is a microscopic polymer layer put on the face of their titanium driver. What this layer does is change the elasticity of the driver face and increases ball speed over a larger area of the clubface. Adding a bit more elasticity with this layer, they are conserving the golf balls energy from the impact.  Due to USGA rules, this technology falls under their coating regulations. Which add a correction factor to the ball speed testing done for conforming golf clubs. This rule was introduced when Taylormade went to their carbon clubface. Which I didn't know existed.  I am sure that center strikes are at the USGA limits like all other drivers. This has my interest. I am always, "window shopping", for new golf equipment 😉  
    • Wordle 1,663 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,663 3/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,663 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨 🟩🟩⬛🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.