Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5989 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I bought a sleeve of the new Taylormade TP red LDP balls out of curiosity and wasn't overly impressed. I've played quite a few rounds this year and the majority of my rounds have been with either a prov1/prov1x or a srixon z-urs/z-urc and I like those balls far more then the taylormades. The tp red flew just as far as the prov1/z-urs but didn't spin as much off the short irons or check up as much on pitch shots and didn't feel as buttery off the putter. I felt after 2 full rounds that the taylormade ball performed just slightly better then the top flite gamer, but not nearly as well as other premium balls. Anyone else ever try these out and have any opinions on the ball? Good or bad?

Posted
I've only played the TP black but I quite like them and would say they are comparable to any other premium ball.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
why does everyone need pro v1x or whatever else is out there i use recycled golf ballsnand still beat people using titlest or taylormade balls
DriverMonster Hi-Bore XLS/w Mintsubishi Diamana Fit-On M Gold Stiff 55g
Woods906F4 3 Wood/w Aldila VS Proto Fairway Stiff 80g
Hybrid3dx red 20 and 23 degree
Irons3dx red 5-pw
Wedgesharmonized sand wedge 56 degree loft and harmonize lob wedge 60 degree loftPutterWhite Hot XG SabertoothBallNoddle or ...

Posted
I found the TP Red LDP to be noticeably softer than the TP Black LDP, very similar to the 2007 ProV1 in terms of feel, providing excellent feedback as I prefer a softer ball. Having said that, I've been playing the TP Black and although it is firmer than the Red, it's got a bit more bite around the greens. They (both Black & Red) feel like substantial, heavier balls. The fact that tour pros trust them for their livelihood is a testament to their quality. However, I feel that with my level ball striking, I'm likely not getting the most performance out of the ball. The TP Black feels like it really like to be thwacked.

With regards to premium balls, I've also played the 2009 B330-S, the 2009 Tx4 Pro and the 2007 ProV1.

The Bridgestone is softer than the TP Black, but doesn't have quite the greenside spin as the Black. Many say it comparable to the 2007 ProV1, but I find it slightly firmer with less greenside spin. It is however, firmer than the red with more greenside spin.

The Tx4 Pro feels like a lighter ball, very clicky off the putter and wedges. Feels like it has a firm cover/mantle yet thin cover, but great greenside spin. I recall a few low driven wedges that checked up quite nicely. It is a unique ball in it's own way.

The 2007 ProV1 is my reference ball in terms of greenside performance. I loved the feel, the weight, the way it sounded off the putter. However, off the driver, I found it spun a bit too much. This is my experience. I have not tried any of the newer 2009 Titleist offerings. Perhaps someone here can elaborate.
You don't know what pressure is until you've played for five dollars a hole with only two in your pocket - Lee Trevino

MP-600 @ 10.5°
Insight BUL 3-wood @ 15°
Insight BUL 5-wood @ 18° IDEA a2 4i Hybrid @ 23° MX-25 5-PW MP-R Series 52° > 50°/05° MP-R Series 54°/10° MP-R...

Posted
I like the TP Red a lot. (*please see sig -- I feel I'm being objective but who knows)

I used to play the Burner TP.... and it's top notch in every category except greenside spin for me. I finally ran through most of the supply and decided I've started playing well enough (ie rate of losing balls has severely decreased) to justify a premium ball. But mostly it's because I play a high spin reliant short game.

I realized it was time to change when I hit my normal pitch with a random Z-URC I happened to find. The thing stuck so fast it was like I hit into super glue.

So I went through my bag of tons of misc premium balls of different brands/lines etc (for sale now if anyone is interested!) took it to the green and tried to see which stayed put the best on short pitches. Then how they putted.

Basically, everything was compared against the pro v1 and v1x. I like those two... but they cost me too much and despite being awesome in the practice green... I've never played well with em during a round (in all aspects). Only the TP Red and Srixon z-urc/s came close. Ended up going with TaylorMade because of price and because I'm partial to TaylorMade (hence: mental bonus!).

But the ball is amazing on the course. It sticks very well on all my iron shots. I can actually back up wedges every now and then. I have changed a few swing things.... but the ball is getting lots of credit.... It comes off really hot off the driver though. I can't tell if its a good thing or bad thing.... but I'm ending up much further ahead than I should be IMO. (Also... it's Austin, TX.... not a lot of rain.)

First actual round (9 holes) I played seriously with it I scored my best since starting golf.

Driver: Tour Burner 9.5° Stock Stiff
Wood: Tour Burner TS 13° Stock Stiff
Hybrid: Tour Burner T2 18° Stock Stiff
Irons: Tour Preferred 3-PW Rifle Project X 6.0
Wedges: 54.10|58.08 Z TP Rifle Spinner 5.5 Putter: VP Mills VP2 Ball: TP/Red.LDP Bag: Warbird Hot Stand Bag 2.0Started playing...


Posted
I found the TP Red LDP to be noticeably softer than the TP Black LDP, very similar to the 2007 ProV1 in terms of feel, providing excellent feedback as I prefer a softer ball. Having said that, I've been playing the TP Black and although it is firmer than the Red, it's got a bit more bite around the greens.

Exactly the way I would compare the two, however I have been playing the Red. On approaches to the green the Black tend to hop, skip and stop, where the Red will hop, skip and roll. IMHO, the Black are longer off the tee, but the Red are softer when putting.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Note: This thread is 5989 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.