Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5532 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just stumbled across these pieces of technology, searched the site and nothing mentioned them so here they are!

http://www.lasergolfgame.com/

http://www.electricspin.com/

Both are compatable with TW 2008 for PC which means you can play on some of the great courses like Augusta, and practice your game at the same time.

The launchpad one is obviously more realistic with using your own clubs if you have the living room space that is.

Anybody tried these? Recommended? What do you think about price etc.

Posted
Hi binga7,

I have had the Launchpad Tour for a couple of years and whilst initially frustrating to use, having persevered, I have found that there are numerous things that can be done to improve its performance (e.g settings/hardware setup etc..). It is probably best described as an entry level simulator. Accuracy will not be 100% and it cannot differentiate between a push/slice or a pull/hook as it only measures a combined club path/angle at impact which translates to a yardage right or left - this always shows as a hook or a slice even if it was a pull or a push. I found that the turf did not last very long and the supplied tethered ball eventually split. Both of these items can be replaced in the form of a 'reload' kit but you would probably be replacing these quite frequently depending on use. I prefer to hit balls into a net rather than use the tethered ball and have found that replacing the top level of green turf (not lower, impact rubber) with a simple rubber car mat (cut to shape/holes cut for the sensors [using impact rubber layer as template]) and gluing it onto the impact rubber works much better and far more durable.

The next level up is probably the Optishot which seems very popular but is almost double the price of the Launchpad but may offer more accuracy. Again going up a level, is a P3pro which again doubles in price over the Optishot. This trend seems to continue with each step up almost doubling the price until you reach the full blown 50000+ simulators.

It really depends on what you want from the simulator. In my opinion, no simulator, however expensive will ever be able to replicate actually playing a real round of golf (downhill/uphill lies, thick rough, bunkers etc..) so I prefer to think of them as driving range simulators where you can practice shots off a mat at home. Bear in mind that many of the more expensive sims do need to be used indoors under specific lighting conditions so you will need the indoor space. At least with the LaunchPad, it can be used outdoors.

Hope this helps.

Posted
Thanks for the reply. I have since read a couple reveiws on the launchpad product and like you said, there are some bad and good reviews. I was mainly attracted to it because of the Tiger Woods PC game compatability, hoping to d/l Augusta and play on the hallowed turf. I was however skeptical of how it measures half swings and chips shots.

At this point I am not looking at a full on simulator, as I can pretty much play golf all year round where i live, not to mention space is limited, and i cant afford it.

I seem to prefer to practice outdoors for realistic results, so if i just want a bit of fun would it be better to just buy the wii version of Tiger Woods?

EDIT: So the more expensive simulators can show the push-hook, and pull slice?

Posted
So the more expensive simulators can show the push-hook, and pull slice?

Definitely.

If you have an extra $50,000 laying around http://www.fullswinggolf.com/ is easily the best out there. It's almost scary accurate.

Waiting out the 2 feet of snow that just dropped on the course....


Posted
In a nutshell, the lower end simulators use technology (e.g infra red sensors) to measure the club only (Path, speed, angle). This is then translated into a simulated ball flight (based on the club you have told the system you are hitting) and shows this on the screen. In theory, as the Launchpad hardware measures all these factors it should be able to show push-slice and pull-hook. I have raised it with the manufacturers so may be they will release a firmware/software update in future. The more sensors, the better the accuracy.
The high end simulators use things like laser/radar technology as well as IR to measure both the ball flight (launch angle/spin rate etc..) and club to give almost inch-perfect accuracy. Like CassinoNorth says, it would be nice to have $50,000 to afford the best :)

For fun purposes, yes the wii would be a good option, but not with your own clubs. The Launchpad is a good entry-level option to use your own clubs, just don't set your expectations too high.

Posted
I see. I knew it was too good to be true lol!

So how much for something like what Bridgestone golf uses on their ball fittings. When i went to an expo they had a camera setup near the ball, and they claim its very accurate, which i doubt cos the guys told me i was hitting a low straight ball, with their low spin J38 Driver. Normally i have some sort of fade/slice with my Burner Driver.

Posted
I see. I knew it was too good to be true lol!

I don't trust Bridgestone's ball fitting as far as I could throw it.

Is it any wonder why I was fit for a Bridgestone ball?

Waiting out the 2 feet of snow that just dropped on the course....


Note: This thread is 5532 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • For someone with a very consistent swing speed and ball strike, upgrades may improve performance. For everyday golfers, probably not. I'm a rather odd player. I usually get best performance from basic pro or tour heads, but with lighter stock shaft from the model's standard driver set up. (Yes, current EXS is an exception.) When I get a full driver fitting, I usually try a couple of modest upgrade  (not super magic) shafts. Most of the time upgrade gives a couple of extra yards, or 10 yards less. Remember this about stock shafts: They are matched to a particular driver model to fit the type of player likely to adopt that model. Also, most OEMs offer a variety of stock shafts in their drivers. Test for which one works best. And, the final decider...  
    • Uh, seeing you're having trouble with hit-and-miss performance from inherited clubs... Get Fitted! IF the 910H pair don't work, swap them out. Also, only two degrees separation in loft is not much. You might consider a 4W (much more reliable than a 3W) plus hybrid. This would give more distance separation than two Hs. For hybrid, get one you can hit... Maybe a more benevolent 4H. Quite often I try to brand match my bridge clubs (FWs and Hs), and my irons and wedges... but not always. Whatever works!
    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.