Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5391 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted


Originally Posted by johninspain

To cut a long story short I ended up after a few hours of messing around with an average of 295m carry ball speed of 153mph and launch angle of 12 and spin of 3200 rpm.

Originally Posted by johninspain

I would ask you to elaborate on your answer.  According to the PGA there are over 446 players this year with an average drive distance of over 320 yds carry and that is just players in comps where it is recorded it doesnt take into account club pros, teaching pros, amatures or good club players.   And that is just  a

The only objective numbers here are the ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate.      Taking your ball speed of 153mph would suggest a clubhead speed of around 102-105mph, with 102mph being the theoretical minimum clubhead speed you could swing at and achieve a ball speed of 153 (this would be a 1.5 smash factor).     This club head speed would put you in the low end of Tour players.

Many studies have been done to relate clubhead speed and driver distance, and these studies would put the overall driver distance for such a club head speed at around 260-270 yards (carry + roll).     An example is shown in the data below from a 2006 USGA-sponsored study titled  " EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CLUBHEAD SPEED ON DRIVER LAUNCH CONDITIONS AND THE EFFECTS ON DRIVE DISTANCE FOR BALLS USED BY THE PGA TOUR ".    The different curves are for balls with different coefficients of restitution (a.k.a. different ball types).

Club Speed Driver Distance.JPG


The above are for Tour-typical conditions, i.e. optimized launch angle and spin and carry/roll characteristics typical on Tour.     As seen in this data, at your club head speed you are realistically around 265 yards or 242 meters.     Also, as you can see in this data, the longest hitters on Tour need to be achieving club head speeds of over 125mph to get the distances that you're claiming.

As proven in repeated scientific experiments, it is just not theoretically possible to achieve the type of distance the launch monitor is claiming for you given the objective data.     This is a common issue with launch monitors used in golf store fittings - the objective numbers may be correct (speed, spin, angle) but the subjective calculations to estimate distance are often tweaked to better enable selling new clubs.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

no probs guys, to clear it up ill put some picks up or a vid next time im at the fitting bay on trackman !!!!!!  I did get my calculation slightly wrong, its average of 285 meaters whitch is 311 yds


Posted


Originally Posted by Clambake

The only objective numbers here are the ball speed, launch angle, and spin rate.      Taking your ball speed of 153mph would suggest a clubhead speed of around 102-105mph, with 102mph being the theoretical minimum clubhead speed you could swing at and achieve a ball speed of 153 (this would be a 1.5 smash factor).     This club head speed would put you in the low end of Tour players.

Many studies have been done to relate clubhead speed and driver distance, and these studies would put the overall driver distance for such a club head speed at around 260-270 yards (carry + roll).     An example is shown in the data below from a 2006 USGA-sponsored study titled  "EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF CLUBHEAD SPEED ON DRIVER LAUNCH CONDITIONS AND THE EFFECTS ON DRIVE DISTANCE FOR BALLS USED BY THE PGA TOUR".    The different curves are for balls with different coefficients of restitution (a.k.a. different ball types).

The above are for Tour-typical conditions, i.e. optimized launch angle and spin and carry/roll characteristics typical on Tour.     As seen in this data, at your club head speed you are realistically around 265 yards or 242 meters.     Also, as you can see in this data, the longest hitters on Tour need to be achieving club head speeds of over 125mph to get the distances that you're claiming.

As proven in repeated scientific experiments, it is just not theoretically possible to achieve the type of distance the launch monitor is claiming for you given the objective data.     This is a common issue with launch monitors used in golf store fittings - the objective numbers may be correct (speed, spin, angle) but the subjective calculations to estimate distance are often tweaked to better enable selling new clubs.


Thanks for the info and to be fair i did go to the range last night and found some degree of discrepency with the track man figures.


Note: This thread is 5391 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.