Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4932 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So my swing tempo for my irons are pretty much on point.

But the driver, ... I have the same tempo on the back swing, however I have a very fast transition from the top for speed.

I was told that the tempo on the down swing has to be the same as the back swing?

So I'm thinking... I like my backswing tempo, but if I have the same tempo on the downswing, specially

I'm playing a Diamana Whiteboard shaft... wouldn't that totally kill my swing speed?

I'm a bit confused about the relations of tempo and power / Swing speed.


Posted
Obviously the speed of the downswing is going to be considerably faster than the speed of the backswing. I can't remember where I read it, and I certainly can't say it's true, but: - Someone conducted a study of pro golfers and came to the conclusion, using video, that the 'perfect' ratio of DS-BS was (I think) 3:1. Using frames of video, an example would be that if a golfer took 12 frames to complete their backswing, they would - once their downswing began - make contact with the ball in 4 frames. The article went further to say that there were virtually no exceptions. Using Tiger as an example, the article gave examples of when Tiger was driving it poorly and how this ratio was off by a frame or two. Before someone jumps in and flames me, the above is how my memory serves me. I'm not holding the ratio to be true, as it was the author's study, not mine. The 12/4 may have been much different. I just picked a 3:1 as an example.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes


Posted

I actually read that too, called tour transitioning.

I was watching my i7 swing the other day and it was so smooth and it looks slow, but in reality, I was swinging really hard

and hit the ball 190yds+

So to me it doesn't make sense that on video my swing with i7 can look that smooth and slow, yet I was swinging very fast.

With the driver.... it wasn't smooth at all, the transition was very violent and totally different than my iron swing.

So yes, I'm lost


Note: This thread is 4932 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.