Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4561 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I obtained a set of Taylormade R11 irons in February of 2013.  I ended up with the regular flex shafts although my swing speed with my driver is close to 100mph, the KBS shafts felt great and I was hitting the ball very well with the regular flex steel shafts.

I've been improving quite a bit (in March I was a 15.5hc and now down to 10.4).  My ball striking has improved a lot and I am able to hit more GIR than before.  I've noticed over the last several rounds and especially when I am at the range though that especially with my 6 iron - PW that that ball draws much more than before and at times it becomes a hook.  My 4 iron and 5 iron were clubs that I used to hit a fade with but now they are straight or a slight draw.  I have no issue with that but am starting to have issues with 7 iron through PW (sometimes 6 iron too) drawing too much and becoming a hook.  Earlier in the year I was hitting a slight draw only.

In talking to a good friend of mine that has been playing golf for a lot longer than me (I've only been playing for 13 months and 14 days), he believes that as my swing speed increases that the amount of offset in my irons along with maybe I need to go to stiff shafts in the irons is causing the heavy draw/hook with 7 iron - PW and is also the reason that my long irons are now even drawing a bit whereas before they would not.

I'm not sure that I need both stiff shafts and less offset in the irons, maybe just one or the other?  The R11 irons are considered game improvement irons.  I'm going to go to GG and will bring my irons with me as well as maybe trying some other irons that they have for sale.  What should I be looking for as far as numbers go on their machine?  Obviously I am going to be looking at the ball flight comparison between my current irons and the ones that I try.

I really like my irons that I have now and my ball striking is better than it has ever been.  Occasionally I will get fast through the ball but this does not happen often and it's just been a progression towards the bigger draw as I've gotten better.  Has anyone else been through this before where they improve to a point that they need to possible change shafts/clubs?  What did you do and what did you look for?

Here are the specs for my irons currently:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Changing your shafts can cost a couple hundred dollars, so if you really like your irons you can change the shafts or you can just go get custom fit for a new set. But if you change your shafts I would suggest either Project X 6.0 for that swing speed or DG S400. But you definitely need different shafts, with a 100 mph swing speed and regular shafts your going to hit the ball too high, to far left, and not have consistent ball flight.

I personally swing about 105 and I swing X-100s and it was really a benefit to go up to X-stiff, it gave me more control and consistency and a better ball flight. But I would suggest going to a professional club fitter for more advice.


Posted
Originally Posted by Crabtree1997

Changing your shafts can cost a couple hundred dollars, so if you really like your irons you can change the shafts or you can just go get custom fit for a new set. But if you change your shafts I would suggest either Project X 6.0 for that swing speed or DG S400. But you definitely need different shafts, with a 100 mph swing speed and regular shafts your going to hit the ball too high, to far left, and not have consistent ball flight.

I personally swing about 105 and I swing X-100s and it was really a benefit to go up to X-stiff, it gave me more control and consistency and a better ball flight. But I would suggest going to a professional club fitter for more advice.


I went to GG.  I ended up getting the Bridgestone J40 CB irons.  They have much less offset and while the shaft is still "regular" it is heavier than the KBS shafts I currently have.  I really enjoyed hitting them and I tried lots of different brands too.  The J40's that I ordered are coming with the Nippon NS Pro 1050 GH shafts.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4561 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.