Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Article on:The six worst decisions players have made at the U.S. Open


Note: This thread is 3826 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

From golfdigest.com

http://www.golfdigest.com/blogs/the-loop/2015/06/the-six-worst-decisions-player.html

Even the greats make bad decisions.

By Mike Johnson

As the pros get ready to take on Chambers Bay in the 115th U.S. Open, there is a fair chance that by week's end someone is going to be fitted for a pair of goat horns after making a poor decision that potentially costs them the championship. To be clear, poor decisions are not to be confused with poor shots. Sometimes a bad shot is just a bad shot (see Stewart Cink's botched putt at Southern Hills in 2001). Other times, however, the decision-making process is lacking, leading to disaster. Here are six U.S. Open brainlocks that stand out.

Sam Snead, 1939 U.S. Open

Needing only a par to win the 1939 U.S. Open at Philadelphia (Pa.) C.C., Sam Snead stood on the tee of the par-5 18th believing he need a birdie to win. Going for a big drive, he hooked his tee shot into the left rough. A safe play short of the green would have done the trick, but Snead still thinking he needed to make 4, hauled his 2-wood out of the bag and went for the green. The ball landed in a bunker some 100 yards short of the green and plugged, leading to a triple-bogey 8 and one of the great collapses in golf history.

Lloyd Mangrum, 1950 U.S. Open

In a playoff for the 1950 U.S. Open title at Merion (Pa.) G.C., George Fazio, Lloyd Mangrum and Ben Hogan fought it out for the trophy. Fazio was never a factor, but Mangrum was only one behind Hogan as they played the 16th. On the green, Mangrum was addressing a short par putt when he spotted a bug on his ball. Incredibly, Mangrum picked up the ball and blew off the bug, thus incurring a two-stroke penalty and handing Hogan a three-stroke lead. Hogan eventually won by four and his 1-iron shot on the last hole Sunday went down in history as one of the great clutch shots of all time. But who knows what might have transpired if Mangrum had gone on to win instead of Hogan?

Ben Hogan, 1960 U.S. Open

While the 1960 U.S. Open at Cherry Hills (Colo.) C.C. will always be remembered for Arnold Palmer's historic driving of the first green and subsequent 65 in the final round, Ben Hogan's error in judgment on the 71st hole greatly aided Palmer's cause. Tied with Palmer playing the par-5 17th, Hogan was just short of the moat-surrounded green in two. The final day consisted of 36 holes of play back then and Hogan had hit all 34 greens in regulation up to that point. Gunning at the front pin position, Hogan's wedge shot hit the green and then spun back off the green and into the water, ending his chances. Afterwards, the 48-year-old Hogan knew he had blundered. "When will I ever learn not to go for the pin there?" he said.

Arnold Palmer, 1966 U.S. Open

Leading by seven shots entering the final nine holes, Arnold Palmer forgot the golfer's credo of "staying in the moment" and got ahead of himself. Seeking to tie or break Ben Hogan's Open scoring mark of 276, Palmer continued to play aggressively. Slowly the lead evaporated. Still, Palmer was six up with six to play and five up with four to play. Firing at the flag on the par-3 15th, Palmer found sand and a bogey. He would bogey 16 and 17 as well and end in a playoff with Billy Casper, who would win the title the next day and make Palmer the author of biggest collapse in Open history.

Tom Kite, 1989 U.S. Open

Leading the U.S. Open at Rochester, N.Y.'s Oak Hill C.C. by three strokes, Tom Kite unwisely reached for his driver on the 406-yard fifth hole during Sunday's final round. The hole, named ``Double Trouble,'' for a stream that comes into play on both the tee shot and the approach, saw most players use a fairway wood or long iron to avoid the water lurking on the right. But Kite felt confident and went with the big stick. It turned out to be a disastrous choice. His tee shot found the water and by the time he holed out (after missing an 18-inch putt for a 6), Kite had carded a triple-bogey 7, lost his lead and eventually finished five shots back of Curtis Strange.

Phil Mickelson, 2006 U.S. Open

Striving for his first U.S. Open and third consecutive major championship, Phil Mickelson appeared to finally have the golf gods on his side after a remarkable recovery shot on the 17th hole allowed him to come to the 18th tee with a one-shot lead. However instead of opting for a fairway wood off the tee to get the ball in play, Mickelson, who had been wild off the tee all week, chose driver and sliced it so wildly that his ball bounced off a hospitality tent. Even though a bogey would still tie Geoff Ogilvy, Mickelson's course management went on hiatus as he again went the aggressive route, trying to carve a 3-iron through the trees. Lefty eventually made a double bogey, lost by one and afterward uttered the now oft-repeated line,  "I am such an idiot."

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Phil Mickelson, 2006 U.S. Open

Striving for his first U.S. Open and third consecutive major championship, Phil Mickelson appeared to finally have the golf gods on his side after a remarkable recovery shot on the 17th hole allowed him to come to the 18th tee with a one-shot lead. However instead of opting for a fairway wood off the tee to get the ball in play, Mickelson, who had been wild off the tee all week, chose driver and sliced it so wildly that his ball bounced off a hospitality tent. Even though a bogey would still tie Geoff Ogilvy, Mickelson's course management went on hiatus as he again went the aggressive route, trying to carve a 3-iron through the trees. Lefty eventually made a double bogey, lost by one and afterward uttered the now oft-repeated line,  "I am such an idiot."

I'd say if he took that same swing with the 3-wood he would have sliced just as far left ;) Actually he probably got a good break bouncing off the tent and ending up in trampled down grass. If he hit 3-wood he'd probably end up the thick rough and have to hack out down the fairway.

What is a better position though, back bunker or 100 yards short in the fairway? That's tough to say. That bunker shot was clearly not one of Phil's best.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3826 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.