I actually got my 6 iron a couple of weeks ago, and I must say it is a very, very nice club. I´ve been playing steel shafted X-18s for over 2 years and with the new burner I noticed a significant improve on accuracy and feel (don´t care for distance, since for me it´s all about choosing the right club, no matter if it´s a 5 or a 6).
The club looks really cool too, I got a regular graphite shaft, which is, of course, a lot lighter than my x-18´s iron 6.
I think there are some posters on this forum trying to mislead people on the quality of the burner irons set, which I personally think are great, and actually are a strong candidate for my next set purchase...probably around august. I can´t understand how somebody can say that technology is not an improving factor in the game, if that was true we´d still be playing those ugly little-headed wooden drivers, and those really heavy irons.
Also, I don´t see why I should be playing my clubs until they get rusty and useless, that´s a pretty cheap thinking. If you like a set which make you feel more confident on your game, even if you play them as as good as your 1.9XX Ping Eye irons, and you have the money, why not going for them?. For me it´s like cars, you don´t run the same car for 20 years even if it runs perfectly well, if you have the chance to go for a nicer and newer one, why not doing it?. I know is not the arrow, it´s the indian, but I´m sure that golf companies I&D; departments are not losing their time on inventing more efficient technologies.
Just my 2 cents...