Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6486 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just took delivery on my new Snake Eyes 675XC irons with Aerotech i95 shafts from Golfsmith. Problem is the irons are 1/4" too short. GS will order new set for me or extend the irons 1/4". My question is if I let them do the extension, does it compromise the performance of the shaft/club at all?

My 2nd issue is that the brand-new iron heads all have very small "nicks" (about 1/8") in the topline and on the toe of the sole. In addition, they also have a dimple (about the size of a pinhead) in the heel. Am I being too picky by complining? Is this normal with brand new iron heads?

Thanks
Ken

Posted
adding a little length wont do anything to the performance of the club, adding on an inch will make a difference, especialy the driver, as far as all the nicks goes, if they are new, it should not be all nicked up....i would make sure you recieved a new set, does anyone know how long a "newbie" takes to be a member so i can post?

Whats in my bag

Irons 2-pw mp-32 s300

fairway wood big bertha fusion 3+ 13* aldila nvs 55-sDriver 440sz 7.5* gs-6 s-flexwedge 56* SI beryllium wedge 52* MP seriesball hx tourputter hummmm


Posted
1/4 short. may not even be that bad to play them. but to make it a quick turn around- have them extend them. the nicks on the clubs- bring to their attention when you send them back for the extensions.
see what happens- all you can do.

Posted
Thanks. I will request nothing less than $100 credit, otherwise I send them back and they try again. Golfsmith is very good in that regard.

Posted
i would ask them to get a new set since it's not your fault that they come in short.

Launcher 460 10.5° <BB Solution 130 R>
Wishon 949MC 16.5° <SK Fiber Tour Trac 80 R>
3DX DC Ironwood 20°, 23° <UST SR2 R>
MX-23 5-PW <KBS Tour R>
Vokey 250.08, SM54.10, SM58.08 <DG Wedge> Callie 33.75"TLT Series 4MOI matched


Posted
If it were me I would ask for a new set all together, you get a new set of clubs and you want them to be brand new and the right size and all. I wouldnt settle for that, if you wanted a set that didnt fit you and had nicks in it you could have gotten a used set on Ebay.

Definitely tell them to send you a new set, sized correctly.
Driver-Taylor Made R7 460cc 10.5* Fujikara REAX Stiff
Fairway Wood-Taylor Made R7 Draw 15* Fujikara REAX Stiff
Hybrid Taylor Made 19* Rescue Mid Steel Stiff
4-PW-Golfsmith G40 TT Lite XL Stiff
GW-Ben Hogan Riviera 8* Bounce 50*SW-Ben Hogan Riviera Medium Bounce 56*LW-Cleveland 60* 588 ChromePutter-Taylo...

Posted

I have a great deal of experience buying components from Golfsmith, but not finished clubs. Other than one cheaper head with a rattle in it, they have always been top notch for parts.

I bet that the irons were lie/loft adjusted to correct some tiny manufacturing errors or because of fitting requirements. The equipment used to help adjust the lie/loft angle can be rough on clubheads. In my experience, the Golfsmith staff are rather poor clubmakers too.

The clubs seeming 1/4'' too short is probably because they were not measured in the special, official way. Golf clubs can seem about 1/4'' too short if they are not measured correctly.

I am deeply sorry that Golfsmith served you so poorly. Once, I got them to do something for me (instead of doing it myself) and they royally screwed it up. I got very upset. It was not a good experience for me. Golfsmith is really just an excellent supplier of club parts, not a place to actually get those parts assembled into clubs. They should link the customer to proper clubmakers and personal fitters if they do not have any themselves.


Posted

Oh, and to answer your questions, extending a shaft without special care can screw up the club's feel, swingweight balance, lie fitting (if you got that), shaft flex, durability, and possibly even the grip diameter. A 1/4'' extention is not that bad, but remember that the extender weights more than the same length of shaft and is stiffer. Also, the extender will have to be inserted a good ways into the shaft in addition to the length out of it. Even a 1/4'' extension could put the feel, swingweight and flex reasonably off.

I would complain to Golfsmith, but not strongly until you are sure that they made errors. Communication is key to find out what is really happening. The length thing could have been right to begin with, though the cosmetic flaws seem like an obvious mistake to me.

I really do not know for sure what is wrong other than that the clubheads do not look good. That is all of the information I can give that might help you. I hope things get straightened out for you.


Note: This thread is 6486 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.