Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Net Double Bogey for Handicap and League Competition?


Note: This thread is 1680 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

For years and years our league has used double-par as the maximum score to be entered on any one hole. It was used both for the competitive score as well as in the handicap calculation for our weekly net stroke play competition. The old “Equitable Stroke Control” figure was never used. Last year we changed to a maximum Net Double Bogey for the handicap calculation but we still used double-par as the max number for the gross score. For next season we’re thinking of changing to using NDB for both, but should we? Some are thinking we should still use double par for the weekly competition as NDB maybe gives an unfair advantage to the higher handicappers. That's what we're not certain about.

The average handicap in our league is 18 (they range from 5-34) and there are usually one or two blow-up holes that occur each week, mostly by one of the higher handicappers, although there are a couple of difficult Par-3’s over water that could, and have, snagged everyone at one time or another. Regardless, although we're not sure, we’re guessing the overall impact of changing would be minimal because some of those net double bogey holes would end up at double par anyway.  

Just curious, what do other leagues do? 

Edited by xrayvizhen

Driver, 3W & 4 Hybrid: 2023 :titleist: TSR3 
Irons: 2026 image.png.2e064f052ff54f728490dd3c58bf56c1.pngPro-M15
Wedges: 2012 :callaway: XTour 56& 2021 Jaws 60o

Putter: :odyssey: White Hot #7 (Mallet)/:tmade: Juno (Blade) plus 7 or 8 others in a barrel in my basement

 

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted

Use NDB. The rounds that use even NDB rarely count toward a handicap, so people who say "oh, but taking only an 8 on that par five is two strokes lower than taking a double-par 10" are both mathematically correct and real-world relatively insignificant.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with @iacas that the high numbers being lopped off rarely make much of a difference in anyone's handicap.

Do you have the players record net double bogey or do they record their actual score and the committee applies the limitation? I find many players struggle with recognizing which holes are their stroke holes (or 2 stroke holes) and then working out what net double bogey would be. We are a senior league, not a league of mathematicians.  😉  We have our players limit themselves to a maximum of "9" on any hole and let the tournament management software calculate the ESC/Net DB for posting.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 hours ago, bkuehn1952 said:

I agree with @iacas that the high numbers being lopped off rarely make much of a difference in anyone's handicap.

Do you have the players record net double bogey or do they record their actual score and the committee applies the limitation? I find many players struggle with recognizing which holes are their stroke holes (or 2 stroke holes) and then working out what net double bogey would be. We are a senior league, not a league of mathematicians.  😉  We have our players limit themselves to a maximum of "9" on any hole and let the tournament management software calculate the ESC/Net DB for posting.

It's not the handicaps we're concerned about....we know that's going to be accurate. It's the weekly and overall year-end competition we're concerned about. We're thinking average scores will be artificially lower than they actually should be.

Players just turn in their gross scores and the software does all the calculating after someone (meaning me) plugs in everyone's gross scores hole by hole. There's no way 99% of these guys would be able to figure out which holes they get strokes on and how many. Since I'm considered the numbers guru, I'm the one elected to figure this stuff out and will ultimately be the one who makes the decision (and get the bitching afterwards). I'm leaning towards agreeing with @iacas though. 

 

Driver, 3W & 4 Hybrid: 2023 :titleist: TSR3 
Irons: 2026 image.png.2e064f052ff54f728490dd3c58bf56c1.pngPro-M15
Wedges: 2012 :callaway: XTour 56& 2021 Jaws 60o

Putter: :odyssey: White Hot #7 (Mallet)/:tmade: Juno (Blade) plus 7 or 8 others in a barrel in my basement

 

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted
3 hours ago, xrayvizhen said:

We're thinking average scores will be artificially lower than they actually should be.

Again, it'll be rare, and far more often affect only those who are going to finish in the bottom half anyway.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 12/1/2021 at 7:29 PM, bkuehn1952 said:

I find many players struggle with recognizing which holes are their stroke holes (or 2 stroke holes) and then working out what net double bogey would be. We are a senior league, not a league of mathematicians.  😉  We have our players limit themselves to a maximum of "9" on any hole and let the tournament management software calculate the ESC/Net DB for posting.

In our league, handicaps range from 5 to 40. We tried NDB but was a mess. People didn't know, and as it could change from week to week, people got it wrong.  Double par on par 3's didn't seem like enough, so was voted to just keep gross scores for league purposes.  Our league uses a combo of points for match play and stroke play.  We see 13's carded now and then.

Mike

Driver: TM Sim2 9* Ventus Black, M5 9* Kuro Kage
Fwy: TM SLDR 3W, 5W;    Hybrid: TM M1 4 Hybrid
Irons: TM Tour Preferred MC 2014
Wedges: TM Tour Preferred, 52 @ 51*, 56
Putter: Ping Scottsdale TR Anser 2 or Odyssey Rossie

It isn't the hours that you put in at practice that count. It's the way you spend those minutes. -- tony lema

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Not to belabor the point even further but I asked a local teaching pro I know. Instead of answering directly, he suggested emailing the USGA or the N.J. State Golf Association. He said either would respond quickly. So, I emailed both, and they both responded the very next day and agreed. To quote the USGA, "Since this is a net format of play, we would not recommend using a net value like net double bogey as a maximum hole score for the purposes of the competition. We would recommend setting a fixed gross maximum hole score value for the purposes of the competition, such as double-par, 10 strokes, etc., so it is consistent for all golfers where they can discontinue play."

I'm now inclined to go with that, mainly because we won't have to do anything different than we did last year nor will we have to "alert the troops" which always raises a stink.

 

 

Edited by xrayvizhen

Driver, 3W & 4 Hybrid: 2023 :titleist: TSR3 
Irons: 2026 image.png.2e064f052ff54f728490dd3c58bf56c1.pngPro-M15
Wedges: 2012 :callaway: XTour 56& 2021 Jaws 60o

Putter: :odyssey: White Hot #7 (Mallet)/:tmade: Juno (Blade) plus 7 or 8 others in a barrel in my basement

 

 

 


Note: This thread is 1680 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The wind might be different above 60 feet, but peak height for many golfers is 80-90 feet, so it's spending a good chunk of its time being affected by the wind below 60 feet. But, yes, judging the wind is one of the toughest things. We've had a very windy spring, but it's been a bit more normal lately.
    • So, I was watching some YouTube golf. Ryan Ruffels mentioned that the Australian National Golf Team brought in the sailing team to teach them how to read wind. They said that anything above 60-FT in-the-air basically fallows the wind currents. So, picking up any grass and throwing it in the air is basically pointless since most all golf shots are going to be above 90-FT in the air. He did make the comment that if you do play on courses where trees are routinely above 60-FT, then the swirling wind matters. That is why, like on the 12th hole at Augusta, it's a pain. The trees down there influence that shot. If your shots are getting near the top of the trees, or above the trees, look up the direction of the wind. If you want to get a better gauge of the wind. Go to the national weather service. If you type in the zip code for the location of the course, at the bottom of the page there is a clickable image for a graph of the weather, Hourly Weather Forecast.  The graph will have surface wind (33-FT above ground), but it will tell you the direction the wind is coming from (i.e. out of the north). If you want to be really technical about it. Going from 33-FT to 100-Ft in height, you are increasing wind speed by about 25% as well. 
    • If you are the golfer who wants to go out on the weekend. Enjoy a few beers with some friends, hacking it around the course. Don't have intention of practicing to get better. Then go buy the cheapest golf balls. Don't waste money when you are not putting in the effort.  The opposite is true. If you plan on getting trying to get better, playing more, practicing more, or if you are a halfway decent to very good golfer who is in the wrong golf ball. Getting into the right golf ball for your game is beneficial. You are putting in time, money, effort into your game. Why devalue that effort or hurt your game by playing a crappy golf ball. 
    • Golf balls are not all the same, no. You're right about that. Finding a good golf ball for your game is important to play your best.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.